Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity Clinical Trial
— SEALBULKOfficial title:
Influence of Surface Sealants on the Quality of Posterior Restorations With Bulk Fill Composites
Verified date | December 2023 |
Source | Universidade Federal Fluminense |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Treatment clinical trial, randomized, controled, parallel, double-blinded, with three groups, that aims to evaluate if there is some advantage in applying surface sealants (Biscover, Bisco, USA or Permaseal, Ultradent, USA) associated with a Bulk Fill Composite (Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill, Ivoclar Vivadent,Liechtenstein). Volunteers will be selected and recruited,following inclusion criteria and pre-established exclusion. All volunteers will be informed and sign a term of clarification and consent. 53 enrolled patients will receive 159 Class I or Class II dental restorations, made in three different ways, one from each experimental group (no sealant, or one of the evaluated surface sealants). Occlusal or Proximo-occlusal lesions will receive the selected treatments separated by groups. Group Bulk without surface sealant (BNS), Group Bulk and Biscover (BSB), and Group Bulk and Permaseal (BSP). Immediate post-operative tooth sensitivity will be evaluated after one week. Restorations will be evaluated every 6 months for pain assessment, shape, fractures, staining or recurrent caries, using scores. To determine in which group each tooth will be enrolled, the authors will randomize the teeth.
Status | Active, not recruiting |
Enrollment | 53 |
Est. completion date | September 30, 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | March 30, 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 75 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - All patients must have at only 20 teeth in function, must have at only 3 carious occlusal or proximo-occlusal lesions, or old restorations that need to be changed, in different teeth. Those lesions must be more than 2 mm deep, should have exposed dentin, and must have at only 50% of margins in enamel. Teeth should not present periodontal mobility. Exclusion Criteria: - Volunteers with periodontal disease; with gingival bleeding; use of anti-inflammatory drugs in the last 30 days. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Brazil | Universidade Federal Fluminense - School of Dentistry | Nova Friburgo | RIO DE Janeiro |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Universidade Federal Fluminense |
Brazil,
Abbas G, Fleming GJ, Harrington E, Shortall AC, Burke FJ. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with a packable composite cured in bulk or in increments. J Dent. 2003 Aug;31(6):437-44. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(02)00121-5. — View Citation
Bayraktar Y, Ercan E, Hamidi MM, Colak H. One-year clinical evaluation of different types of bulk-fill composites. J Investig Clin Dent. 2017 May;8(2). doi: 10.1111/jicd.12210. Epub 2016 Jan 22. — View Citation
Costa T, Rezende M, Sakamoto A, Bittencourt B, Dalzochio P, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Influence of Adhesive Type and Placement Technique on Postoperative Sensitivity in Posterior Composite Restorations. Oper Dent. 2017 Mar/Apr;42(2):143-154. doi: 10.2341/16-010-C. Epub 2016 Nov 28. — View Citation
Moorthy A, Hogg CH, Dowling AH, Grufferty BF, Benetti AR, Fleming GJ. Cuspal deflection and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with bulk-fill flowable resin-based composite base materials. J Dent. 2012 Jun;40(6):500-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.015. Epub 2012 Mar 3. — View Citation
Roggendorf MJ, Kramer N, Appelt A, Naumann M, Frankenberger R. Marginal quality of flowable 4-mm base vs. conventionally layered resin composite. J Dent. 2011 Oct;39(10):643-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.07.004. Epub 2011 Jul 27. — View Citation
van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Randomized 3-year clinical evaluation of Class I and II posterior resin restorations placed with a bulk-fill resin composite and a one-step self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent. 2015 Feb;17(1):81-8. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a33502. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Restoration Loss | It will be evaluated the increase in the number of losses of dental restorations in the period of five years, verified by periodic visual clinical examination (6/6 months) based on the statement of difference of at least 25% in the amount of remaining restorations in the different groups. | Five years | |
Secondary | Marginal Pigmentation | It will be evaluated the increase in the number of dental restorations with marginal pigmentation in the period of five years, verified by periodic clinical visual examination (6/6 months) based on the statement of difference of at least 25% in the amount of stained restorations in the different groups. | Five years | |
Secondary | Post-Operative Hypersensitivity | It will be evaluated the increase in the number of dental restorations with dentin hypersensitivity in the period of five years, verified by periodic clinical examination (6/6 months) based on the statement of difference of at least 25% in the amount of restorations with dentin hypersensitivity in the different groups. | Five years | |
Secondary | Secondary Caries | It will be evaluated the increase in the number of dental restorations with secondary caries in the period of five years, verified by periodic radiographic examination (6/6 months) based on the statement of difference of at least 25% in the amount of restorations with secondary caries in the different groups. | Five years |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03244124 -
Different Application Strategies When Using Futurabond Universal in Class V Cavities
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT04630587 -
Longevity of Dental Fillings Utilizing 3D Printing
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03657862 -
Outcomes of Restoring Untreated and SDF-treated Dentine Caries Lesions in Primary Teeth of Preschool Children
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03645551 -
Clinical Longevity of Ceramic Laminate Veneers
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04838483 -
Clinical Performance of Posterior Indirect Adhesive Restorations
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03933176 -
Absence of Liner Following the Selective Caries Removal (ALFSCaRe)
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03343184 -
Clinical Evaluation of Bulk Fill Composite Restorations Associated to Universal Adhesive System
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06392685 -
Composite Repair Using Silane Coupling Agent
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT03517124 -
Ceramic Tooth Restorations - a Comparison Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06456619 -
CAD-CAM or Adhesive Approaches for MIH Treatment
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05125900 -
Clinical Evaluation of Subgingival Open Sandwich Restorations
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03515265 -
Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced Composite Versus Microhybrid Composite Restorations
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03283280 -
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Versus Indirect Nanohybrid Resin Composite Onlay Restorations.
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02572570 -
Clinical Investigation of a New Bulk Fill Composite Resin in the Restoration of Posterior Teeth
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06164418 -
Comparative Evaluation of Class V Restorations
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04293770 -
Clinical Evaluation of Posterior Indirect Adhesive Restorations
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06183320 -
Can Flowable Bulk Fill Composites be Used in Proximal Area of Class II Restorations
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04306549 -
Twenty-Four-Month Clinical Comparison of Two Bulk-Fill and Microhybrid Composite Restorations
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05551130 -
Could Bulk Fill Glass Hybrid Restorative Materials Replace Composite Resins in Treating Permanent Teeth?
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02948686 -
Different Application Strategies When Using Ambar Universal in Class V Cavities
|
N/A |