Radiofrequency Can be Used to Treat Splenic Trauma Because of Its Excellent Coagulation Hemostasis Clinical Trial
Official title:
Radiofrequency-assisted Splenic Preservation Versus Conventional Treatment of Blunt Splenic Injury: A Prospective Cohort Study.
| NCT number | NCT03890328 |
| Other study ID # | 81672857 |
| Secondary ID | |
| Status | Completed |
| Phase | N/A |
| First received | |
| Last updated | |
| Start date | March 1, 2009 |
| Est. completion date | June 1, 2014 |
| Verified date | March 2009 |
| Source | Southwest Hospital, China |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
Radiofrequency (RF) can be used to treat splenic trauma because of its excellent coagulation
hemostasis. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of RF-assisted spleen-preserving surgery
with that of conventional splenorrhaphy/splenectomy in the treatment of blunt splenic injury.
A total of 122 patients with splenic trauma admitted to two tertiary referral centers from
June 2011 to June 2014 were included in this prospective cohort study. The 67 patients at one
center were treated by radiofrequency-assisted spleen-preserving therapy (RF group), and the
55 patients admitted at the other center underwent conventional treatment (CT group).
Demographics and clinical characteristics of the two groups were comparable.
Compared to traditional splenorrhaphy and splenectomy, RF-assisted splenic hemostasis and
salvage was safe, effective and easy to use in the treatment of splenic injuries. In
particular for high-grade splenic injuries, these techniques preserved sufficient splenic
tissue without any increase in patients with surgical risk.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 122 |
| Est. completion date | June 1, 2014 |
| Est. primary completion date | June 1, 2014 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | N/A to 70 Years |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: 1. age below 70 2. blunt abdominal injury combined with indication of post-traumatic splenectomy according to the guidelines provided by the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract in 2005 3. patients transferred directly to the trauma center after injury who had not been treated by any specific spleen-directed therapy in the transferring hospital 4. AAST grade II splenic injury with hemodynamic instability or progressive bleeding requiring active intervention 5. AAST grade ?-?splenic injury, or splenic laceration involving less than 50% of the splenic parenchyma Exclusion Criteria: 1. penetrating abdominal injury 2. concomitant organ injury with an abbreviated injury scale (AIS) greater than 4 that threatened the life of the patient 3. excessive vascular injury to the splenic pedicle or substantial devitalized splenic tissues when it was expected in when less than 25% of the spleen could be preserved 4. patients who had failed NOM 5. patients with pathologic splenic rupture |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| China | Institute of hepatobiliary surgery,Southwest Hospital | Chongqing | Chongqing |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Southwest Hospital, China | West China Second University Hospital |
China,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Mean operative time, | Mean operative time of the RF group was compared with that of CT group. | intraoperative | |
| Primary | intraoperative bleeding | Intraoperative bleeding of the RF group was compared with that of CT group. | intraoperative |