Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03867045
Other study ID # Pro00086667
Secondary ID
Status Terminated
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date August 21, 2019
Est. completion date December 16, 2019

Study information

Verified date November 2020
Source Duke University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to develop an on-line electronic symptom management application that can ultimately be used to improve clinical outcomes in patients with mRCC treated with cabozantinib.


Description:

This is a single-site, prospective technology-based, clinical trial. Nine patients with mRCC initiating cabozantinib therapy who meet subject eligibility criteria will be enrolled in this study. Subjects will be given an iPOD touch with the symptom monitoring application installed, physical activity and blood pressure monitors. Each patient will be kept on study for the first 12 weeks of therapy with cabozantinib. Subjects on treatment for less than 12 weeks will not be replaced.The symptoms and other data (physical activity, blood pressure) recorded electronically by the patient will be compared to symptoms recorded in the medical record at interval clinic visits.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Terminated
Enrollment 1
Est. completion date December 16, 2019
Est. primary completion date December 16, 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: Patients > 18 years of age Patients planning to start treatment with cabozantinib therapy for renal cancer. Technology requirement: The patient will need to have home wireless internet access for use of the software and technology in this study. The patient will need to already have or be willing to set up a Duke MyChart account. Exclusion Criteria: Non-English Speaking. Any patient who is not able to comprehend and operate the technology at the discretion of the enrolling provider.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Usability of an electronic symptom management application
Usability of an electronic symptom management application in a pilot group of patients receiving cabozantinib for mRCC through data analytics and feedback from users

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina
United States Duke Raleigh Hospital Raleigh North Carolina

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Duke University Exelixis

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Number of comments from participants indicating ease of use of the application. Number of comments from participants indicating ease of use of the application. 12 weeks
Secondary Blood pressure (BP) readings measured daily by the BP monitoring device compared with those BP readings measured at interval clinic visits within the first 12 weeks to determine similar detection of symptoms. Blood pressure (BP) readings measured daily by the BP monitoring device compared with those BP readings measured at interval clinic visits within the first 12 weeks to determine similar detection of symptoms. 12 weeks
Secondary Movement recorded daily by the activity tracking device compared with ECOG assessment outcomes measured during interval clinic visits within the first 12 weeks to determine similar estimates of activity. Movement recorded daily by the activity tracking device compared with ECOG assessment outcomes measured during interval clinic visits within the first 12 weeks to determine similar estimates of activity. 12 weeks
Secondary Number and frequency of adverse symptoms reported in the symptom management application compared with clinical assessment of adverse events recorded at interval clinic visits within the first 12 weeks to determine similar report of adverse symptoms. Number and frequency of adverse symptoms reported in the symptom management application compared with clinical assessment of adverse events recorded at interval clinic visits within the first 12 weeks to determine similar report of adverse symptoms. 12 weeks