Periodontal Bone Defects Will be Detected and Measured by 2 Techniques CBCT and Intraoral Digital Radiography to Compare the Accuracy of These Techniques Clinical Trial
Official title:
Cone Beam Computed Tomography Versus Intraoral Digital Radiography in Detection and Measurements of Simulated Periodontal Bone Defects Diagnostic Accuracy Study
The selection of a regenerative approach is primarily based on the configuration of the
intrabony defect and esthetic risk of treatment. Accurate diagnosis of periodontal bone
defects, such as vertical bone defects or furcation involvements, is a challenge for dental
clinicians. A deficiency in comprehensive diagnosis may result in: 1) compromised prognosis
of teeth; 2) changes in treatment plan; 3) unnecessary treatment; 4) longer treatment time;
and 5) unanticipated treatment costs.
Thus, it is very important to have access to accurate diagnostic tools that can aid
clinicians in cultivating an appropriate treatment choice. Periodontal assessments utilizing
both clinical and radiographic examinations allow for the establishment of an accurate
diagnosis as well as subsequent treatment choices.
Radiography plays an important role in periodontal diagnosis mainly because radiographs can
reveal the amount and type of damage caused to the alveolar bone.
Digital imaging technique has created challenging opportunities for dental radiographic
diagnosis. Digora was the first digital system for dental radiography based on a
photostimulable phosphor technology.
E9ickholz et al. at 1999 compared linear measurements of interproximal bone loss on digitized
radiographic images after application of different filters to the gold standard of
intrasurgical measurements they concluded that all radiographic assessments on the digitized
images came close to the intasurgical gold standard.
2D technologies do not allow for measurement of the bucco-lingual (B-L) width of the defect.
Only the vertical height and the mesio-distal (M-D) width of the defect can be measured with
2D images.
Use of 3D volumetric images and 2D images in artificial bone defects have shown that CBCT has
a sensitivity of 80% to 100% in detection and classification of bone defects, while intraoral
radiographs present a sensitivity of 63% to 67%.
When compared with periapical and panoramic images, the CBCT has also shown an absence of
distortion and overlapping, and the dimensions of the images that it presents were compatible
with the actual size of the individual.
A few studies have been published comparing CBCT with digital radiography for the detection
and measurements of periodontal bone defects.
| Status | Not yet recruiting |
| Enrollment | 15 |
| Est. completion date | November 10, 2020 |
| Est. primary completion date | November 10, 2019 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | N/A and older |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - • The selected dry jaws should be intact with no mechanical damage (chips, cracks, or fractures in the alveolar process). - The teeth will be naturally attached to human jaws. - The study samples will not identified by age or gender group. Exclusion Criteria: - • teeth with metallic restorations to avoid artifacts generation on CBCT scanning. - Teeth with anomalies and fractures. |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | |||
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Marwa Mohamed Ali |
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | CBCT and Intraoral Digital Radiography | Detection and measuring of artificially prepared periodontal bone defects. | 24 months |