Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03698799
Other study ID # 077/2561(EC4)
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date April 9, 2018
Est. completion date March 20, 2020

Study information

Verified date June 2020
Source Mahidol University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Lung Protective Ventilation strategy (LPV) with low tidal volume and adequate positive end-expiratory pressure is recommended for not only patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) but also those without ARDS too. From previous studies, adherence to LPV strategy reported is only 40% and data is limited in surgical patients. The investigators aim to describe ventilation management and find out the adherence rate to LPV strategy applied to surgical patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) and their associated outcomes.


Description:

Mechanical ventilation (MV) is one of the one organ support most frequently applied to patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). Despite considering as a life-saving intervention, MV may have detrimental effects, namely ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). A mechanical breath with positive airway pressure may overstretch alveoli, especially in the non-dependent part of the lungs, and subsequently result in barotrauma and volutrauma. While cyclic opening and closing of alveoli during mechanical breath due to alveolar collapse at the end of expiration can cause atelec-trauma or cyclic atelectasis. All of these can lead to the activation of respiratory and systemic inflammatory response, so-called bio-trauma. To minimize the effects of MV on VILI, the lung protective mechanical ventilation (LPV) strategy have been proposed and now generally accepted as a standard practice in mechanically ventilated patients. The LPV strategy basically consists of ventilation with the low tidal volume of 6-8 mL/kg of predicted body weight (PBW) with limited plateau pressure of less than 30 cm H2O plus applying sufficient amount of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to prevent atelectasis. The LPV strategy has been clearly demonstrated benefits in not only patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) but also those with normal lungs including lessened respiratory and systemic inflammatory response and injured lungs, decreased duration of MV and length of stay (LOS), improved organ failure, and decreased pulmonary and other complications as well as mortality. Nevertheless, the adherence rate to the LPV strategy reported in the literatures is only approximately 40% in mechanically ventilated patients. For surgical patients, approximately 65% of those admitted to ICU require MV support either following operation or during their stay in ICU. To date, there is limited data regarding MV management in surgical patients who required MV support perioperatively. In addition, the difference in perioperative MV practices and their associated clinical outcomes has been not well determined in this setting. The aim of this study is to explore the current practice of MV according to the LPV strategy applied to surgical patients admitted to surgical ICU (SICU) and their associated clinical outcome. The primary outcome of this study is to determine the adherence rate to the LPV strategy at the initiation of MV support in mechanically ventilated patients in SICU. The LPV strategy in this study is defined as ventilation with the tidal volume of <8 mL/kg of PBW plus applying PEEP of at least 5 cm of water. The secondary outcomes are factors associated with the adherence to the LPV strategy, incidences of pulmonary and other complications, LOS in SICU and in hospital, SICU and hospital discharge status, and status at 28 and 90 days following the initiation of MV support. Patients are divided into two groups, LPV and Non-LPV, according to their MV setting and clinical outcomes are statistically compared between groups.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 306
Est. completion date March 20, 2020
Est. primary completion date June 30, 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients whose age of 18 years old or more

- Patients admitted to two participating SICU

- Patients requiring MV support with the anticipated duration of 12 hours or more

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patients not requiring MV support during SICU stay

- Patients requiring MV support for less than 12 hours in SICU

- Patients requiring MV support for more than 24 hours prior to SICU admission

- Patients included in this study once and re-admitted to the SICU

- Patients requiring non-invasive MV support

- Moribund or terminal cases

- Patients who refuse to participate in the study

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Locations

Country Name City State
Thailand Siriraj Hospital Bangkoknoi Bangkok

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Mahidol University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Thailand, 

References & Publications (11)

Biehl M, Kashiouris MG, Gajic O. Ventilator-induced lung injury: minimizing its impact in patients with or at risk for ARDS. Respir Care. 2013 Jun;58(6):927-37. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02347. Review. — View Citation

Chen YF, Lim CK, Ruan SY, Jerng JS, Lin JW, Kuo PH, Wu HD, Yu CJ. Factors associated with adherence to low-tidal volume strategy for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome and their impacts on outcomes: an observational study and propen — View Citation

Kalhan R, Mikkelsen M, Dedhiya P, Christie J, Gaughan C, Lanken PN, Finkel B, Gallop R, Fuchs BD. Underuse of lung protective ventilation: analysis of potential factors to explain physician behavior. Crit Care Med. 2006 Feb;34(2):300-6. — View Citation

Neto AS, Simonis FD, Barbas CS, Biehl M, Determann RM, Elmer J, Friedman G, Gajic O, Goldstein JN, Linko R, Pinheiro de Oliveira R, Sundar S, Talmor D, Wolthuis EK, Gama de Abreu M, Pelosi P, Schultz MJ; PROtective Ventilation Network Investigators. Lung-Protective Ventilation With Low Tidal Volumes and the Occurrence of Pulmonary Complications in Patients Without Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Analysis. Crit Care Med. 2015 Oct;43(10):2155-63. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001189. Review. — View Citation

Petrucci N, De Feo C. Lung protective ventilation strategy for the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;(2):CD003844. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003844.pub4. Review. — View Citation

Santamaria JD, Tobin AE, Reid DA. Do we practise low tidal-volume ventilation in the intensive care unit? a 14-year audit. Crit Care Resusc. 2015 Jun;17(2):108-12. — View Citation

Serpa Neto A, Cardoso SO, Manetta JA, Pereira VG, Espósito DC, Pasqualucci Mde O, Damasceno MC, Schultz MJ. Association between use of lung-protective ventilation with lower tidal volumes and clinical outcomes among patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2012 Oct 24;308(16):1651-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.13730. — View Citation

Sutherasan Y, Vargas M, Pelosi P. Protective mechanical ventilation in the non-injured lung: review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2014 Mar 18;18(2):211. doi: 10.1186/cc13778. Review. — View Citation

Terragni P, Ranieri VM, Brazzi L. Novel approaches to minimize ventilator-induced lung injury. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2015 Feb;21(1):20-5. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000172. Review. — View Citation

Umoh NJ, Fan E, Mendez-Tellez PA, Sevransky JE, Dennison CR, Shanholtz C, Pronovost PJ, Needham DM. Patient and intensive care unit organizational factors associated with low tidal volume ventilation in acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2008 May;36(5):146 — View Citation

Wang C, Wang X, Chi C, Guo L, Guo L, Zhao N, Wang W, Pi X, Sun B, Lian A, Shi J, Li E. Lung ventilation strategies for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 9;6:22855. doi: 10.1038/srep22855. Review. — View Citation

* Note: There are 11 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Adherence rate to LPV strategy at the initiation of MV support The LPV strategy is defined as ventilation with tidal volume of <8 mL/kg of PBW plus applying PEEP of at least 5 cm H2O. During the first 24 hours following the initiation of MV support
Secondary Incidences of pulmonary and other complications Pulmonary complications include pneumonia, ARDS, atelectasis, restoration of MV support after liberation from MV, pleural effusion, cardiogenic pulmonary edema, pneumothorax and new pulmonary infiltration. Other complications include stroke, myocardial ischemia/infarction, arrhythmias, acute kidney injury, sepsis, new infection other than pneumonia, and re-admission to the SICU. During the first 7 consecutive days following the initiation of MV support
Secondary Length of stay in SICU and in hospital Total days of stay in SICU and in hospital following the initiation of MV support. Up to 90 days following the initiation of MV support
Secondary SICU and hospital discharge status, and status at 28 and 90 days Status whether alive or decease Up to 90 days following the initiation of MV support
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT03994419 - PErioperAtive CHildhood ObesitY
Active, not recruiting NCT01681238 - Goal-directed Therapy in High-risk Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT05613439 - The Fast-track Centre for Hip and Knee Replacement Database
Recruiting NCT03740438 - Modeling of the Hemoglobin Drop in the Uncomplicated Postoperative Course
Completed NCT03269760 - Multimodal Sleep Pathway for Shoulder Arthroplasty Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05594199 - Feasibility of a Virtual Smoking Cessation Program N/A
Completed NCT00538499 - Fentanyl With or Without Bupivacaine in Reducing Pain in Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Chest Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT01690338 - A Study of Residual Curarization Incidence in China Phase 4
Recruiting NCT01110798 - J-Pouch Colorectal Anastomosis or Straight Colorectal Anastomosis in Treating Patients With Rectal Cancer Who Have Undergone Surgery to Remove the Tumor N/A
Completed NCT00859157 - Pain After Tumescent Mastectomy or Standard Mastectomy in Women With Stage I, Stage II, or Stage III Breast Cancer N/A
Withdrawn NCT03531268 - Prospective Study to Evaluate the Clinical Utility of Perioperative Pharmacogenomic Testing N/A
Recruiting NCT04356638 - a Phase III Trial of Safety and Efficacy of Premedication With Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam in Pediatric Patients Phase 3
Completed NCT03579121 - Genomic Opioid Optimization of Dosing and Selections (GOODS) Study N/A
Completed NCT03899441 - Multimedia Aid Gynecologic Counseling and Consent N/A
Recruiting NCT06123039 - Use of Heart-lung Interaction to Predict Haemodynamic Tolerance to the Open Lung Approach With Individualised PEEP
Completed NCT01672892 - Standard Versus Intensity-Modulated Pelvic Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Endometrial or Cervical Cancer Phase 3
Completed NCT01510652 - More Options Available With a Quadripolar LV Lead pRovidE In-clinic Solutions to CRT Challenges N/A
Completed NCT01680367 - Wound Dressings For Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites in Patients Undergoing Surgery N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT00005600 - Axillary Drainage Following Lymph Node Dissection in Women With Stage I or Stage II Breast Cancer N/A
Recruiting NCT05743673 - SHAPE Test for Preoperative Risk Stratification