Stability of Dental Implants Placed in Patients With Vitamin D Deficiency Using Sequential Drilling Versus a New One Single Drilling Design

Implant Stability With Vitamin D Deficiency Clinical Trial

Official title:

Stability of Dental Implants Placed in Patients With Vitamin D Deficiency Using Sequential Drilling Versus a New One Single Drilling Design: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03695562
• Other study ID #: perio21005
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 4
• Start date: February 1, 2019
• Est. completion date: February 14, 2021

Study information

• Verified date: June 2021
• Source: Cairo University
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

• Vitamin D considers as the most potent effect on calcium level in blood it was found that vitamin D target mainly bone tissue intestine and kidney for calcium absorption In bone, vitamin D stimulates mainly the activity of osteoclasts osteoblast activity on the other hand it increases the production of extracellular matrix proteins by different osteoblastic activity. Vitamin D also increase intestinal calcium absorption and regulate synthesis and secretion of parathyroid hormone (PTH)

Implant consider as one of the most successful treatment modalities that usually used in dental clinics for restoring single or multiple missed teeth knowing that successful rate of dental implant may reach up to 99% however there are many different techniques for implant placement they mainly depend on the same procedure for implant placement even sequential drilling technique or single drilling technique some paper supported that sequential drilling is much better than single drilling technique on other hand some assume that single drilling is much better as it save time effort material less bone trauma & less heat generation although there are many studies performed on sequential drilling & single drilling techniques we still have a gap for understanding the ideal technique for implant placement in patients with vitamin D deficiency

Description:

The high predictability of dental implants has led to routine use with a great expectation for success There are many researches focused on the outcome of delayed dental implant Since the first report of highly success rate after placement of a dental implant there has been increasing interest in this technique for implant treatment The goal of modern dentistry is to restore the patient's dentition to normal contour function comfort esthetics speech and health regardless of the atrophy disease or injury of the stomatognathic system As a result of disease related tooth loss and the value placed upon teeth there has been a continual search for methods by which missing teeth could be replaced Early artificial replacements were made from natural teeth and a variety of substitute materials All transplantation of a tooth from one person to another was an early method by which lost teeth were replaced Archeological discoveries indicate that many ancient civilizations practiced allogenic tooth transplantation. In 1561 Ambrose Pare reported that decayed teeth could be replaced by using extracted teeth from another individual and is credited with being the first to mention transplantation The core objective of dental implant therapy is to improve functional dentition throughout life Nevertheless there are many factors that may effect on implant stability A significant part of implant failure may be related to systemic condition that my retard dental implants osteointegration one of this factors is vitamin D deficiency recently many paper focused on vitamin D deficiency and its impact effect on bone turn over around dental implant There are many different techniques for implant placement even sequential drilling or single drilling technique knowing that single drilling technique has a compression effect which may enhance implant stability however sequential drilling don't have compression effect on bone some paper supported that sequential is much better than single drilling technique however some paper showed there is no clinical significance between two techniques the main idea here that we need to find an ideal technique for implant placement in patients with vitamin D deficiency knowing that vitamin D play an important role for bone turnover around dental implant to attain the required dental implant stability also play a role for osteoblast osteoclast activity Also vitamin D play a role for regulation of parathyroid hormone which play a role for homeostasis of calcium level from bone in blood .

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 30
• Est. completion date: February 14, 2021
• Est. primary completion date: August 20, 2020
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria:

1. Age: 18-70.

2. Patient with vitamin D deficiency (< 30 ng/ml )

3. Patients with single or multiple missed teeth in upper & lower molar premolar area.

4. Patients with adequate bone volume for the dental implant procedure.

5. Patient with sufficient interarch space.

6. Patients who are compliant to oral hygiene measures.

7. Patient consent approval and signing.

Exclusion criteria:

1. Systemic disease that contraindicates implant placement or surgical procedures.

2. Poor patient's compliance.

3. Psychological problems.

4. Pathology at the site of intervention.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Implant Stability With Vitamin D Deficiency
• Vitamin D Deficiency

Intervention

Procedure:
• sequential drilling technique
Patient with vitamin D deficiency using sequential drilling technique

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Egypt	Cairo university	Cairo

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Cairo University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Egypt, 

References & Publications (1)

Merheb J, Temmerman A, Rasmusson L, Kübler A, Thor A, Quirynen M. Influence of Skeletal and Local Bone Density on Dental Implant Stability in Patients with Osteoporosis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Apr;18(2):253-60. doi: 10.1111/cid.12290. Epub 2016 — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	primary/secondary implant stability	primary & secondary implant stability using ostell/periotest	6 months
Secondary	Swelling	post operative swelling questionnaire yes/no	10 days
Secondary	post operative Pain: NRS	post operative pain by numerical rating scale from 0 to 10 , 0 no pain , 10 severe pain	10 days
Secondary	bone resorption	crestal bone resorption :Digital radiography: Digora unit: mm	6 months