Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03622944
Other study ID # GO15/564
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date October 1, 2015
Est. completion date October 1, 2016

Study information

Verified date August 2018
Source Hacettepe University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The aim of the study is to determine the effect of exercise and two different manual therapy methods on pain, quality of life and posture in people with neck pain.


Description:

Deep friction massage will use on cervical regions in first group, muscle energy technic will use second group and cervical stabilization exercise will use as an third group. For all groups, pain intensity, Quality of life and posture will assess.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 45
Est. completion date October 1, 2016
Est. primary completion date March 1, 2016
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 25 Years to 65 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- clinical diagnosis of cervical disorder (for example; chronic neck pain, cervical disc herniation)

- must have pain at least three months.

Exclusion Criteria:

- History of structural scoliosis

- History of surgery

- History of metabolic, neurologic and metastatic diseases.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Muscle Energy Technic
post isometric relaxation technics were applied to levator scapulae, trapezius, pectoralis muscles three sessions per week, totally six weeks.
Deep Friction Massage
deep friction massage was applied to cervical region included tendons, muscles and soft tissue.
Exercise
spinal stabilization exercise were applied three sessions in a week totally six weeks.

Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Hacettepe University

References & Publications (4)

Boyles R, Toy P, Mellon J Jr, Hayes M, Hammer B. Effectiveness of manual physical therapy in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review. J Man Manip Ther. 2011 Aug;19(3):135-42. doi: 10.1179/2042618611Y.0000000011. — View Citation

Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Campbell MJ, Anderson PA. Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fu — View Citation

Persson LC, Lilja A. Pain, coping, emotional state and physical function in patients with chronic radicular neck pain. A comparison between patients treated with surgery, physiotherapy or neck collar--a blinded, prospective randomized study. Disabil Rehab — View Citation

Rihn JA, Radcliff K, Hipp J, Vaccaro AR, Hilibrand AS, Anderson DG, Albert TJ. Radiographic variables that may predict clinical outcomes in cervical disk replacement surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015 Apr;28(3):106-13. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31826a0c84. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary change in pain sensitivity pressure pain threshold (PPT) was measured with digital algometer. Pressure pain threshold which identifies minimum levels increasing mechanical stimulus is gold standard method for measuring pain sensitivity. PPT was measured from cervical vertebrae's spinous process and muscle belly's. Algometer range was set 0 kgF to 12kgF. Higher values represent increased pressure sensation. change from baseline PPT at six weeks
Secondary change in Light touch sensation Semmes weinstein monofilaments were used to determine light touch sensation. It has twenty different evaluator size. Evaluator size was started 2.83 point and higher values represent worse outcome. Upper extremity dermatomes were tested. change from baseline light touch sensation at six weeks
Secondary change in upper extremity disability The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire was used.The questionnaire has 34 item which each item scored 1 to 5 points. All responses summed and averaged.This value is then transformed to a score out of 100 by subtracting one and multiplying by 25. This transformation is done to make the score easier to compare to other measures scaled on a 100 scale. Minimum score is "0" and total score is "100". higher values represent a worse outcome. Change from baseline disability at six weeks .
Secondary change in posture Posture was assessed with global postural system. This computer generated system has two cameras and lets three different plane postural assessment. the assessments and postural deviation calculate with computer programme. change from baseline posture at six weeks
Secondary change in perceived life quality perceived quality of life was assessed with nottingham health profile. the questionnaire has 38 questions in 6 subareas, with each question assigned a weighted value; the sum of all weighted values in a given subarea adds up to 100. higher values represent better life quality. change from baseline life quality at six weeks
Secondary change in functional disability Neck Disability Index (NDI) was used.NDI total scores ranged from 0 (no disability) to 50 (severe disability) which have ten items assessing perceived neck pain during daily living activities such as lifting, reading, driving, sleeping and recreational activities. change from baseline functional disability at six weeks
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT02188030 - Individual and Group Exercise Program for Industrial Workers With CANS: Randomized Controlled Trial N/A
Completed NCT05905094 - Postural Correction Exercises Effect on Forward Head Posture N/A
Recruiting NCT05226559 - Effectiveness of Multimodal Physical Therapy in Migraine N/A