Airway Injuries After Intubation Using Videolaryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Adult Patients Requiring Tracheal Intubation

Airway Complication of Anesthesia Clinical Trial

Official title:

Airway Injuries After Intubation Using Videolaryngoscopy Highly Curved Blades Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Adult Patients Requiring Tracheal Intubation: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03613103
• Other study ID #: Airway - 001
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: October 1, 2018
• Est. completion date: December 1, 2023

Study information

• Verified date: December 2023
• Source: Universidad de Antioquia
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Abstract Background Successful tracheal intubation during general anesthesia requires a direct laryngoscope to retract the tongue and soft tissues of the mouth to achieve a line of sight for the larynx. Generally, Macintosh blade laryngoscopy is used to achieve the tracheal intubation. However, difficulties with the tracheal intubation arise the need to use alternative laryngoscopes that use digital or fiberoptic technology, to improve the larynx visibility. Among these devices, highly curved blade videolaryngoscope uses a curved blade to retract the soft tissues of floor of the mouth and transmits a video image to a screen, achieving better larynx visibility. Also, the decrease of the force in the soft tissues with videolaryngoscope could reduce airway injures.

Objectives Our primary objective is to assess whether use of videolaryngoscopy using highly curved blades for tracheal intubation in adults requiring general anesthesia reduces risk of airways injuries compared with Macintosh direct laryngoscopy. Our secondary aim is to assess postoperative satisfaction of the patients, successful intubation at the first attempt, successful global intubation, degree of larynx visibility according to classification Cormack

• Lehane and time taken to perform intubation in videolaryngoscopy vs direct laryngoscopy. Finally, we assess the risk of presenting serious adverse event with the use of videolaryngoscopy compared with Macintosh laryngoscopy in hypoxemia, bradycardia and heart arrest.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 716
• Est. completion date: December 1, 2023
• Est. primary completion date: October 31, 2023
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Over 18 years of age.

• Scheduled for a procedure or surgery that requires general anesthesia that requires orotracheal intubation.

• Scheduled for non-cardiac surgery.

• Elective surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Women in pregnancy.

• Patient refuses to participate in the study before surgery.

• Patients with predictors of anticipated difficult airway.

• Head and neck surgery.

• Go to Intensive Care Unit with endotracheal intubation.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Airway Complication of Anesthesia
• Airway Trauma

Intervention

Device:
• Video laryngoscopy
Intubation with videolaryngoscopy with highly curved blade
• Direct laryngoscopy
Intubation with direct laryngoscopy with macintosh blade

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Colombia	Universidad de Antioquia	Medellin	Antioquia

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Universidad de Antioquia	IPS Universitaria-Universidad de Antioquia

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Colombia, 

References & Publications (34)

Abeyewardene L, Ganta R, Henthorn R. Direct laryngoscopy with the aid of a fiberoptic bronchoscope for tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg. 1996 Sep;83(3):665. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199609000-00066. No abstract available. — View Citation

Barnett SF, Alagar RK, Grocott MP, Giannaris S, Dick JR, Moonesinghe SR. Patient-satisfaction measures in anesthesia: qualitative systematic review. Anesthesiology. 2013 Aug;119(2):452-78. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182976014. — View Citation

Castellanos-Olivares DA, Evangelina-Cervantes DH, Vásquez-Márquez DPI. Satisfacción anestésica como indicador de calidad de la atención médica en el paciente geriátrico. Rev Mex Anestesiol [Internet]. 2013;36(1):250-5. Available from: /www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/rma/cma-2013/cmas131be.pdf

Cormack RS, Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia. 1984 Nov;39(11):1105-11. — View Citation

De Jong A, Molinari N, Conseil M, Coisel Y, Pouzeratte Y, Belafia F, Jung B, Chanques G, Jaber S. Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for orotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2014 May;40(5):629-39. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3236-5. Epub 2014 Feb 21. — View Citation

Di Marco P, Scattoni L, Spinoglio A, Luzi M, Canneti A, Pietropaoli P, Reale C. Learning curves of the Airtraq and the Macintosh laryngoscopes for tracheal intubation by novice laryngoscopists: a clinical study. Anesth Analg. 2011 Jan;112(1):122-5. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182005ef0. Epub 2010 Nov 3. — View Citation

Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C. What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA. 2000 May 24-31;283(20):2701-11. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.20.2701. — View Citation

Favaloro A. Pautas éticas internacionales para la investigación biomédica en seres humanos [Internet]. Index Infectológico. 2008. 1-119 p. Available from: http://www.gramonbago.com.uy/imgnoticias/16791.pdf#page=11

Frerk C, Mitchell VS, McNarry AF, Mendonca C, Bhagrath R, Patel A, O'Sullivan EP, Woodall NM, Ahmad I; Difficult Airway Society intubation guidelines working group. Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Dec;115(6):827-48. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev371. Epub 2015 Nov 10. — View Citation

Gornall BF, Myles PS, Smith CL, Burke JA, Leslie K, Pereira MJ, Bost JE, Kluivers KB, Nilsson UG, Tanaka Y, Forbes A. Measurement of quality of recovery using the QoR-40: a quantitative systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Aug;111(2):161-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet014. Epub 2013 Mar 6. — View Citation

Graham B. Defining and Measuring Patient Satisfaction. J Hand Surg Am. 2016 Sep;41(9):929-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.07.109. — View Citation

Guimaraes-Pereira L, Costa M, Sousa G, Abelha F. Quality of recovery after anaesthesia measured with QoR-40: a prospective observational study. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2016 Jul-Aug;66(4):369-75. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2014.11.010. Epub 2015 Oct 20. — View Citation

Hsu HT, Chou SH, Wu PJ, Tseng KY, Kuo YW, Chou CY, Cheng KI. Comparison of the GlideScope(R) videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope for double-lumen tube intubation. Anaesthesia. 2012 Apr;67(4):411-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.07049.x. Epub 2012 Feb 11. — View Citation

Humanidades D De, Apartado B, España P. Universidad de Navarra Centro de Documentación de Bioética Declaración de Helsinki de la AMM - Principios éticos para las investigaciones médicas en seres humanos. 2013;1-8

Hunter I, Ramanathan V, Balasubramanian P, Evans DA, Hardman JG, McCahon RA. Retention of laryngoscopy skills in medical students: a randomised, cross-over study of the Macintosh, A.P. Advance() , C-MAC((R)) and Airtraq((R)) laryngoscopes. Anaesthesia. 2016 Oct;71(10):1191-7. doi: 10.1111/anae.13589. Epub 2016 Aug 17. — View Citation

Ilyas S, Symons J, Bradley WP, Segal R, Taylor H, Lee K, Balkin M, Bain C, Ng I. A prospective randomised controlled trial comparing tracheal intubation plus manual in-line stabilisation of the cervical spine using the Macintosh laryngoscope vs the McGrath((R)) Series 5 videolaryngoscope. Anaesthesia. 2014 Dec;69(12):1345-50. doi: 10.1111/anae.12804. Epub 2014 Aug 2. — View Citation

Invima - Instituto Nacional de Vigilancia de Medicamentos y Alimentos., Ministerio de Protección Social. Resolución No. 8430 del 4 de Octubre de 1993 - Por la cual se establecen las normas científicas, técnicas y administrativas para la investigación en salud. [Internet]. [cited 2017 Jan 20]. Available from: https://www.invima.gov.co/resoluciones-medicamentos/2977-resolucion-no-8430-del-4-de-octubre-de-1993.html

Jarvis JL, McClure SF, Johns D. EMS Intubation Improves with King Vision Video Laryngoscopy. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2015;19(4):482-9. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2015.1005259. Epub 2015 Apr 24. — View Citation

Jonathan Benumof CAH. Benumof and Hagberg's Airway Management - Jonathan Benumof, Carin A. Hagberg [Internet]. Third Edit. Carin A. Hagberg (The University of Texas MS at H, editor. Elsevier. Philadelphia, PA 19103-2899: Elsevier Inc; 2013. 1142 p. Available from: www.elsevier.com/permissions.

Kaplan MB, Ward DS, Berci G. A new video laryngoscope-an aid to intubation and teaching. J Clin Anesth. 2002 Dec;14(8):620-6. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(02)00457-9. — View Citation

Kill C, Risse J, Wallot P, Seidl P, Steinfeldt T, Wulf H. Videolaryngoscopy with glidescope reduces cervical spine movement in patients with unsecured cervical spine. J Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;44(4):750-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.07.080. Epub 2013 Jan 22. — View Citation

Komatsu R, Kamata K, Sessler DI, Ozaki M. Airway scope and Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients lying on the ground. Anesth Analg. 2010 Aug;111(2):427-31. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e3dfd2. Epub 2010 Jun 7. — View Citation

Kramer A, Muller D, Pfortner R, Mohr C, Groeben H. Fibreoptic vs videolaryngoscopic (C-MAC((R)) D-BLADE) nasal awake intubation under local anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2015 Apr;70(4):400-6. doi: 10.1111/anae.13016. — View Citation

La MDE, Social P. Ministerio De La Proteccion Social Resolucion número 2378 De 2008. 2008;2004(1271):1-10.

Lewis SR, Butler AR, Parker J, Cook TM, Smith AF. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 15;11(11):CD011136. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011136.pub2. — View Citation

Lin W, Li H, Liu W, Cao L, Tan H, Zhong Z. A randomised trial comparing the CEL-100 videolaryngoscope(TM) with the Macintosh laryngoscope blade for insertion of double-lumen tubes. Anaesthesia. 2012 Jul;67(7):771-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07137.x. Epub 2012 Apr 30. — View Citation

Lu Y, Jiang H, Zhu YS. Airtraq laryngoscope versus conventional Macintosh laryngoscope: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2011 Dec;66(12):1160-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06871.x. Epub 2011 Aug 25. — View Citation

Mourao J, Moreira J, Barbosa J, Carvalho J, Tavares J. Soft tissue injuries after direct laryngoscopy. J Clin Anesth. 2015 Dec;27(8):668-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.07.009. Epub 2015 Sep 26. — View Citation

Parasa M, Yallapragada SV, Vemuri NN, Shaik MS. Comparison of GlideScope video laryngoscope with Macintosh laryngoscope in adult patients undergoing elective surgical procedures. Anesth Essays Res. 2016 May-Aug;10(2):245-9. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.167840. — View Citation

Reynolds SF, Heffner J. Airway management of the critically ill patient: rapid-sequence intubation. Chest. 2005 Apr;127(4):1397-412. doi: 10.1378/chest.127.4.1397. — View Citation

Richard M. Levitan M, Scott D. Cook-Sather M, E. Andrew Ochroch M. Demystifying Direct Laryngoscopy and Intubation. Hosp Physician [Internet]. 2000;1(59):47-56. Available from: http://w.hospitalphysician.com/pdf/hp_may00_intub.pdf

Scott J, Baker PA. How did the Macintosh laryngoscope become so popular? Paediatr Anaesth. 2009 Jul;19 Suppl 1:24-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2009.03026.x. — View Citation

Sveinsdottir H, Borgthorsdottir T, Asgeirsdottir MT, Albertsdottir K, Asmundsdottir LB. Recovery After Same-Day Surgery in Patients Receiving General Anesthesia: A Cohort Study Using the Quality of Recovery-40 Questionnaire. J Perianesth Nurs. 2016 Dec;31(6):475-484. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2015.07.003. Epub 2016 May 5. — View Citation

Turkstra TP, Pelz DM, Jones PM. Cervical spine motion: a fluoroscopic comparison of the AirTraq Laryngoscope versus the Macintosh laryngoscope. Anesthesiology. 2009 Jul;111(1):97-101. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181a8649f. — View Citation

* Note: There are 34 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Number of patients with an airway injury	Airway injury will be a composite outcome as follow: Injury in the oral cavity or injury in the laryngopharynx.; These injuries will be evaluated using a digital camera of the oral cavity (fiber optical camera) in the immediate POP.; A patient will be considered positive for the outcome If he/she has at least one of the following findings: Erythema, edema, ecchymosis, laceration, excoriation and / or hematoma in labial, jugal, gingival, lingual mucosa, hard and soft palate; Dental pieces injury: partial and / or total loss of the integrity of the dental piece; Larynx lesions: Edema, laceration, excoriation, erythema, ecchymosis and / or bleeding of pharyngeal laryngeal mucosa.	24 hours
Secondary	Successful intubation at the first attempt	Number of patients with successful intubation at the first attempt.	Immediate postoperative
Secondary	Global of Successful Intubation	Number of patients with successful intubation regardless of the attempts to achieve it.	Immediate postoperative
Secondary	Cormack-lehane visualization	Degree of Cormack-lehane visualization in each patient. The degree of Cormack-Lehane visualization will be measured from I to IV in relation to the visible portion of the glottis; Grade I with total visualization and Grade IV without visualization of glottis.	Immediate postoperative
Secondary	Time to achieve orotracheal intubation	Time measured in seconds to achieve orotracheal intubation in each patient. The time interval is determined from the beginning of laryngoscopy by the anesthesiologist until the verification of tracheal intubation by capnography.	Immediate postoperative
Secondary	Post-anesthetic satisfaction	Post-anesthetic satisfaction in each patient. The Quality of Recovery scale 40 will be used to determine the degree of patient satisfaction, according to the overall and subglobal score, defined by five dimensions: patient support, comfort, emotional, physical independence and pain (includes anatomical airway site).	Immediate postoperative
Secondary	Hypoxemia during induction and intubation	Number of patients with hypoxemia during induction and intubation. Hypoxaemia is defined as an oxygen saturation measured with pulse oximetry less than 92%.	Immediate postoperative
Secondary	Bradycardia during induction and intubation	Number of patients with bradycardia during induction and intubation. Bradycardia is defined as a decrease in heart rate of less than 40 beats / minute.	Immediate postoperative
Secondary	Cardiac Arrest	Number of patients presenting cardiac arrest. Cardiac arrest is defined as the presence of any malignant rhythm: Ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, asystole or pulseless electrical activity plus loss of carotid pulse for more than 10 seconds.	Immediate postoperative