The Provider Awareness and Cultural Dexterity Toolkit for Surgeons Trial

Interpersonal and Communication Skills in Patient-clinician Encounters Clinical Trial

— PACTS  

Official title:

The Provider Awareness and Cultural Dexterity Toolkit for Surgeons Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03576495
• Other study ID #: 2018P001237
• Secondary ID: 1R01MD011685-01A
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: July 1, 2019
• Est. completion date: June 30, 2022

Study information

• Verified date: May 2024
• Source: Brigham and Women's Hospital
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study is designed to test the impact of a new curriculum, called Provider Awareness Cultural Dexterity Toolkit for Surgeons (PACTS), on surgical residents' cross-cultural knowledge, attitudes, and skills surrounding the care of patients from diverse cultural backgrounds, as well as clinical and patient-reported health outcomes for patients treated by surgical residents undergoing this training.

Description:

In order to improve overall health outcomes of minority patients undergoing surgical care, the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) collaborated with the American College of Surgeons (ACS) and prioritized the evaluation and the the effect of improvement in culturally dexterous care on surgical outcomes for patients from disparity populations.

Poor outcomes in patients are attributed to poor patient-provider communication which may lead to treatment errors, inadequate pain management, less patient-centered care, decreased adherence to treatment plans, and worse overall clinical outcomes. Additionally, studies have shown that some surgeons have pro-White implicit biases, which are unconscious, automated preferences that individuals may not even be aware of.

Historically, formal training in cultural competency is generally integrated into medical education at the undergraduate level but it rarely continues up to the post-graduate level. Few surgical programs have attempted to incorporate cross-cultural communication skills into their educational paradigms, and the approaches to doing so have been inconsistent.

In order to add the surgical context in post-graduate level medical education, the investigators adopted a novel approach to cross-cultural communication for surgical trainees, known as cultural dexterity. Cultural dexterity refers to a set of skills and cognitive practices used to maximize communication across multiple dimensions of cultural diversity and deviates from the concept of cultural competency in that it does not demand that learners associate certain practices and behaviors with individuals based on generalizations.

Study design:

Cross-over, cluster-randomized trial

Study Procedures:

Curriculum Administration

The PACTS curriculum incorporates contemporary learning practices such as the "flipped classroom" model and team-based learning. It consists of e-learning modules and interactive sessions in which residents will apply concepts from the e-learning modules to role-play scenarios constructed in a team-based learning format. Residents will be given detailed, scripted prompts for the role-play sessions followed by structured feedback from peers and facilitators.

Outcome Measurement:

Residents

To evaluate the impact of PACTS on surgical residents' knowledge and attitudes about caring for diverse patients, the investigators will use a pre- and post-test in the form of validated instruments that assess knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported skills on a Likert-type scale.

Resident skills will also be objectively assessed through an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) that will be created by the study staff and administered immediately before the intervention and 3 months after the intervention has been completed. The OSCE uses 5-point Likert scale questions to evaluate resident performance across multiple domains. These may be administered virtually or in-person.

A Standardized Patient evaluator and a third-party trained impartial observer will evaluate the residents on these domains, and the resulting numerical scores will be averaged. It will serve both a summative and educational purpose in this context.

Residents will be required to take a knowledge survey before and after receiving the PACTS curriculum or standard training. Attitudes regarding the importance of facing cross-cultural health care situations will be assessed across multiple domains using a novel survey instrument that is based on a survey that was used in a similar curriculum aimed at medical students, as well as the Values and Belief Systems domain.

Patients

To evaluate patients' satisfaction and clinical quality related to PACTS training, the investigators will administer surveys to patients treated by residents to determine satisfaction with pain management, communication, trust-building, and comprehension of the informed consent discussion two months before and after the intervention is implemented.

Patient satisfaction will be assessed using elements of the validated Patient Satisfactions Survey.

We plan to collect clinical surgical outcomes obtained from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database for each patient participant before and after the PACTS curriculum is implemented to measure individual outcomes such as length of stay, postoperative complications, unplanned reoperations, and 30-day morbidity/mortality. A post hoc analysis of clinical outcomes will be performed.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 2901
• Est. completion date: June 30, 2022
• Est. primary completion date: June 30, 2022
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

*Eligibility Criteria for Residents:

Inclusion Criteria:

• All residents in the general surgery program at Johns Hopkins University, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Brown University, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Howard University, and Washington University in St. Louis.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Non-surgical residents at Johns Hopkins University, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Brown University, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Howard University, and Washington University in St. Louis.

*Eligibility Criteria for Patients:

Inclusion Criteria:

• Admitted to surgical service under the care of a participating resident;

• Able to recognize resident as the main care provider from a photo;

• Able to consent as determined by a cognitive screen for capacity to give informed consent

• Fluent in English or Spanish.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Admitted to Intensive Care;

• Mentally impaired and/or not oriented to person/time/ place.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Interpersonal and Communication Skills in Patient-clinician Encounters
• Patient-reported Satisfaction With Resident Physicians Involved in Their Care
• Patients' Clinical Health Outcomes After Surgery
• Resident Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Cross-cultural Care

Intervention

Other:
• PACTS curriculum
The cultural dexterity curriculum, known as PACTS (Provider Awareness Cultural Dexterity Toolkit for Surgeons) focuses on developing cognitive skills to adapt to individual patients' needs to ensure personal, patient-centered surgical care. The curriculum is comprised of four educational modules on establishing trust in the physician-patient relationship, communicating effectively with patients with limited English proficiency, discussing informed consent, and issues surrounding pain management. Each module consists of an independent learning activity, an interactive role-play, and a post-lesson assessment.
• Standard Residency Curriculum
The standard residency curriculum consists of previously scheduled resident didactic sessions at all academic medical centers that may or may not include topics on cultural competency or cross-cultural care.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Johns Hopkins Hospital	Baltimore	Maryland
United States	Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center	Boston	Massachusetts
United States	Brigham and Women's Hospital	Boston	Massachusetts
United States	Massachusetts General Hospital	Boston	Massachusetts
United States	Eastern Virginia Medical School	Norfolk	Virginia
United States	Rhode Island Hospital	Providence	Rhode Island
United States	Washington University in St. Louis	Saint Louis	Missouri
United States	Howard University Hospital	Washington	District of Columbia

Sponsors (9)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Brigham and Women's Hospital	Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Brown University, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Howard University, Johns Hopkins University, Massachusetts General Hospital, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD), Washington University School of Medicine

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (10)

Betancourt JR, Green AR, Carrillo JE, Ananeh-Firempong O 2nd. Defining cultural competence: a practical framework for addressing racial/ethnic disparities in health and health care. Public Health Rep. 2003 Jul-Aug;118(4):293-302. doi: 10.1093/phr/118.4.293. — View Citation

Betancourt JR, Green AR, Carrillo JE, Park ER. Cultural competence and health care disparities: key perspectives and trends. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Mar-Apr;24(2):499-505. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.2.499. — View Citation

Cooper LA, Roter DL, Carson KA, Beach MC, Sabin JA, Greenwald AG, Inui TS. The associations of clinicians' implicit attitudes about race with medical visit communication and patient ratings of interpersonal care. Am J Public Health. 2012 May;102(5):979-87. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300558. Epub 2012 Mar 15. — View Citation

Haider AH, Dankwa-Mullan I, Maragh-Bass AC, Torain M, Zogg CK, Lilley EJ, Kodadek LM, Changoor NR, Najjar P, Rose JA Jr, Ford HR, Salim A, Stain SC, Shafi S, Sutton B, Hoyt D, Maddox YT, Britt LD. Setting a National Agenda for Surgical Disparities Research: Recommendations From the National Institutes of Health and American College of Surgeons Summit. JAMA Surg. 2016 Jun 1;151(6):554-63. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.0014. — View Citation

Haider AH, Scott VK, Rehman KA, Velopulos C, Bentley JM, Cornwell EE 3rd, Al-Refaie W. Racial disparities in surgical care and outcomes in the United States: a comprehensive review of patient, provider, and systemic factors. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Mar;216(3):482-92.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.11.014. Epub 2013 Jan 11. — View Citation

Haider AH, Weygandt PL, Bentley JM, Monn MF, Rehman KA, Zarzaur BL, Crandall ML, Cornwell EE, Cooper LA. Disparities in trauma care and outcomes in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 May;74(5):1195-205. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31828c331d. — View Citation

Horvat L, Horey D, Romios P, Kis-Rigo J. Cultural competence education for health professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 5;2014(5):CD009405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009405.pub2. — View Citation

Shah SS, Sapigao FB 3rd, Chun MBJ. An Overview of Cultural Competency Curricula in ACGME-accredited General Surgery Residency Programs. J Surg Educ. 2017 Jan-Feb;74(1):16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.06.017. Epub 2016 Sep 20. — View Citation

Torain MJ, Maragh-Bass AC, Dankwa-Mullen I, Hisam B, Kodadek LM, Lilley EJ, Najjar P, Changoor NR, Rose JA Jr, Zogg CK, Maddox YT, Britt LD, Haider AH. Surgical Disparities: A Comprehensive Review and New Conceptual Framework. J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Aug;223(2):408-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.04.047. Epub 2016 Jun 10. No abstract available. — View Citation

Weissman JS, Betancourt J, Campbell EG, Park ER, Kim M, Clarridge B, Blumenthal D, Lee KC, Maina AW. Resident physicians' preparedness to provide cross-cultural care. JAMA. 2005 Sep 7;294(9):1058-67. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.9.1058. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Change in Residents' Questionnaire Scores Measuring Knowledge From Pre- to Post-PACTS Curriculum	The effect of PACTS curriculum on surgical residents' questionnaire scores measuring knowledge about caring for culturally diverse patients at time Period 2 (18 months). At this time, the Early Intervention Group had already received the PACTS curriculum. The Delayed Intervention Group had not received the PACTS curriculum, serving as the control group at this time period.; Resident knowledge: Percent score out of 100, with range 0-100%. Higher values represent a better outcome, with 100% as the highest score possible. This is the average score for the Early Intervention and Delayed Intervention groups at Period 2.	Period 2 (18 months)
Primary	Change in Residents' Cross Cultural Care Survey Scores From Pre- to Post-PACTS Curriculum	The effect of PACTS curriculum on surgical residents' cross cultural care survey about caring for culturally diverse patients at time Period 2 (18 months). At this time period, the Early Intervention group received the PACTS curriculum, while the Delayed Intervention Group had not received the PACTS curriculum, serving as the control group. The cross cultural care survey was evaluated using a modified Likert type scale (with scale ranging from lowest to highest: very unprepared, somewhat unprepared, somewhat prepared, very well prepared). Resident scores were dichotomized into two groups, those reporting "very unprepared" and "somewhat unprepared", and those reporting "somewhat prepared" and "very well prepared." Here reported values are representative of the percentage of participants who reported "somewhat prepared" and "very well prepared" at time Period 2.	Period 2 (18 months)
Primary	Change in Residents' Questionnaire Scores Regarding Self-Assessed Skills From Pre- to Post-PACTS Curriculum	The effect of PACTS curriculum on surgical residents' self-assessed skills for caring for culturally diverse patients at time Period 2 (18 months). Self-assessed skills ranged from levels 1 to levels 4, with level 1 indicated less skilled, and level 4 indicating skillful. For purposes of comparison, resident scores were dichotomized into two groups: less skilled (referring to skill levels 1 and 2), and skillful (levels 3 and 4). Here reported values are representative of the percentage of participants who reported skill levels 3 or 4, indicating skillful. Results here demonstrate the proportion of residents in the Early Intervention (Intervention) group and Delayed Intervention (control group) who self-evaluated their skills as skillful at Period 2.	Period 2 (18 months)
Primary	Change in Residents' Questionnaire Scores Regarding Their Beliefs From Pre- to Post-PACTS Curriculum	The effect of PACTS curriculum on surgical residents' beliefs regarding caring for culturally diverse patients at time Period 2 (18 months). At this time, the Early Intervention Group had already received the PACTS curriculum. The Delayed Intervention Group had not received the PACTS curriculum, serving as the control group at this time period. The questionnaire was scored using a modified Likert type scale with a range from lowest to highest: strongly disagree, moderately disagree, mildly disagree, strongly agree, moderately agree, mildly agree. Answers were dichotomized into two groups: strongly disagree, moderately disagree, and mildly disagree; and strongly agree, moderately agree, and mildly agree. Here reported values are representative of the proportion of participants who answered "strongly agree, moderately agree, and mildly agree."	Period 2 (18 months)
Primary	Objective Structured Clinical Examination Scores	Standardized Patient observers evaluated surgical residents on multiple dimensions of cultural dexterity and communication skills using Likert-type scales. The scale range, from lowest to highest was: "Not at all; a little bit; somewhat; mostly; a great deal." Scores were put into two groups: 1) not at all, a little bit, and somewhat; 2) mostly and a great deal. The percentage of residents who received scores of "mostly" and "a great deal" in categories of trust, limited english proficiency, consent, and pain were reported.	Period 2 (18 months)
Secondary	Patients' Self-reported Satisfaction Scores	We used an adapted version of the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) to assess patients' (1) satisfaction with pain management, (2) satisfaction with communication including specific measures for limited English proficiency (LEP), (3) trust, and (4) comprehension of informed consent. Patient satisfaction was captured using a modified Likert scale from lowest to highest: strongly disagree, disagree, neither agree nor disagree, agree, and strongly agree. The values reported below are the percentage of participants who reported "agree" or "strongly agree."	Period 2 (18 months)
Secondary	Median Hospital Length of Stay for Patient Participants	National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) metrics for each patient participant capturing hospital length of stay in days. Patients designated to Early Intervention Group were cared for by a resident enrolled in the Early Intervention group, where the PACTS curriculum was administered between period 1 (0 months) and period 2 (18 months). Patients designated to the Delayed Intervention group were cared for by a resident enrolled in the Delayed Intervention group, where the standard curriculum was administered between period 1 (0 months) and period 2 (18 months). We are comparing median length of stay at period 2.	Period 2 (18 months)