Malocclusion, Angle Class II, Division 1 Clinical Trial
Official title:
Evaluation the Dento-alveolar Changes After Platelet Rich Fibrin (i-PRF) Injection During Upper Canine Retraction Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)
Twenty patients need therapeutic extraction of the maxillary first premolars with subsequent retraction of the maxillary canines, will be divided randomly into two groups, and will randomly assigned to one side of the maxillary arch at the first premolar region, and the other side served as the control. Canine retraction will be initiated after completion of the leveling and alignment phase via closed nickel-titanium coil springs applying 150 g of force per side. Soldered transpalatal arch will be used as an anchor unit. The dento-alveolar changes will be assessed immediately before retraction and after 6 months using CBCT.
Extraction is a procedure that is currently performed in orthodontics, either in the context
of early treatment or for adolescents with severe crowding or protrusion/overjet. The
consequences of this ''simple'' procedure may show up many mucosal and osseous complications
such as: bone resorption with collapse of the alveolar process, a gingival cleft or gingival
recession in the area surrounding the extraction site. Besides the potential esthetic
repercussions, these periodontal defects also give rise to a clinical problem with achieving
some orthodontic movements, such as complete closure of the space or uprighting a root.
A systematic review evaluating alveolar bone dimension changes of extraction sockets showed a
range of width reduction of 2.6-4.6mm, Two-thirds of the loss occurred in the first 3 months,
the remodeling of alveolar bone in the extraction site always decreases ridge volume and
deforms the ridge configuration which impairs orthodontic movement of the tooth posteriorly.
Endogenously produced biologicals have been tested based on their roles in the turnover of
alveolar bone in response to orthodontic tooth movement as well as during wound healing.
From here it has been thought about using a method to enhance bone quality after extraction.
The platelet rich fibrin (PRF) has the ability to enhance tissue regeneration, accelerate
wound healing and inducing stem cells differentiation through its growth factors (GFs).
PRF characteristics in comparison to platelet rich plasma PRP are:
1. its preparation is completely natural and there is no need for thrombin addition so
there isn't immune reaction
2. it contains stem cells
3. it requires one stage centrifugation
4. PRF has been reported to gradually release autologous growth factors and expressed
stronger and more durable effect on the cellular proliferation and differentiation than
PRP in vitro This is the first study in the world that will use i-PRF with Orthodontic
treatment, because of its benefits and easiness of using in dental clinic Study sample
that consists of 20 patients, Allocation of the sides of intervention (PRF injection)
and control sides is made by computer program (Excel).
After ensuring of the patients compliance with the terms and conditions of this study, the
purpose and methods of the study will be explained to the patients using Information Sheet.
In case of approval to participate, the patients asked to sign the Informed Consent.
Extra & Intra-oral photographs, impressions and clinical examination will be made.
Canine retraction will be initiated after completion of the leveling and alignment phase via
closed nickel-titanium coil springs applying 150 g of force per side at the same time 20ml of
patients' blood will be withdrawn and centrifuged (700 rpm within 3 minutes) to get 4ml
i-PRF. PRF will be injected at the area of the extracted first premolar, The first point
place is in the buccal interventional side (supra periosteal injection) and the second point
place is in the palatal interventional side(sub periosteal injection). PRF will be injected
twice at the beginning and at the middle of the canine retraction.
High resolution CBCT will be taken before the beginning of canine retraction (T0) and after 6
months (T1).
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03659188 -
Comparison Between Two Methods in the Acceleration of the Retraction of Upper Canines
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06403033 -
Mini-implant-supported Twin-Block in Treating Patients With Class II Division 1 Malocclusion
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02428621 -
Early Treatment for Class II Division 1 Malocclusion With Twicare® and Herbst Removable Appliances
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02475785 -
Evaluation of Mini Plates Anchorage With Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03239275 -
Clinical Evaluation of Bio-creative Therapy for En Masse Retraction of the Maxillary Anterior Teeth
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03999307 -
Low-Level Laser Therapy and Flapless Corticopuncture Effect on Accelerating Six Maxillary Anterior Teeth Retraction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03399422 -
Efficacy of Biological Technique in Upper Canine Retraction and Levels of Discomfort
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05610150 -
Pharyngeal Airway Dimensions With Twinblock Versus Myobrace Appliances in Developing Skeletal Class II Patients
|
N/A |