Ruptured and Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Clinical Trial
Official title:
Data Collection of the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms With the WEB™ Aneurysm Embolization System: a Monocentric Post-market Observational Study
NCT number | NCT03379714 |
Other study ID # | MTS-02 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Withdrawn |
Phase | |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | January 1, 2018 |
Est. completion date | January 31, 2022 |
Verified date | December 2017 |
Source | Medical Therapy Solutions |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Observational [Patient Registry] |
Flow disruption is a new endovascular approach for treatment of both ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms, which involves placement of an endosaccular device (WEB) which modifies the blood flow at the level of the neck and induces intraaneurysmal thrombosis. The WEB was designed to treat wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms. This observational study will collect data about the routine practice in one center of using the WEB in ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms. The primary objective is to evaluate its efficacy by assessing the anatomic outcome during follow-up.
Status | Withdrawn |
Enrollment | 0 |
Est. completion date | January 31, 2022 |
Est. primary completion date | December 31, 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patient is at least 18 years old. 2. Patient is capable to undergo general anaesthesia. 3. Patient must sign and date the informed consent form prior to data registration. If patient is not able to give informed consent for himself/herself, a legally authorized representative must give informed consent on his/her behalf. 4. Patient has a ruptured or unruptured intracranial aneurysm requiring endovascular treatment. 5. Aneurysm with dome-to-neck ratio = 1. 6. Aneurysm size favourable for WEB implantation (aneurysm width < 10 mm or aneurysm width > 3mm). Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patient is pregnant. 2. Patient has renal insufficiency (GRF < 45 ml/min/1.73 m2). 3. Patient is unable to comply with the study protocol (e.g. no permanent address, known to be non-compliant or presenting an unstable psychiatric history). |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Belgium | University Hospital Antwerp | Edegem | Antwerp |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Medical Therapy Solutions | Archer Research |
Belgium,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Determination of anatomic outcome | grade of occlusion of the aneurysm assessed by MRA WEB Occlusion Scale: WOS A: complete occlusion WOS B: complete occlusion with opacification of the proximal recess WOS C: residual neck filling WOS D: residual aneurysm filling |
at 6 months | |
Primary | Determination of anatomic outcome | grade of occlusion of the aneurysm assessed by MRA WEB Occlusion Scale: WOS A: complete occlusion WOS B: complete occlusion with opacification of the proximal recess WOS C: residual neck filling WOS D: residual aneurysm filling |
at 24 months | |
Secondary | Determination of procedural complications (Adverse events) during the operation | Procedural complications: aneurysm rupture, dissection, thromboembolic events (symptomatic and non-symptomatic), device protrusion through the neck of the aneurysm inside the parent artery, detachment problem, device stuck in microcatheter, bleeding. | during index-procedure | |
Secondary | Recording the use of additional devices during treatment. | Possible additional devices are stent, coils, flow diverter | during index-procedure | |
Secondary | Determination of the occurrence of post-procedural symptomatic thromboembolic events | up to 24 months follow-up | ||
Secondary | Determination of clinical outcome: assessing disability of the patient by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) | 0 - No symptoms. - No significant disability. Able to carry out all usual activities, despite some symptoms. - Slight disability. Able to look after own affairs without assistance, but unable to carry out all previous activities. - Moderate disability. Requires some help, but able to walk unassisted. - Moderately severe disability. Unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance, and unable to walk unassisted. - Severe disability. Requires constant nursing care and attention, bedridden, incontinent. - Dead. |
At baseline | |
Secondary | Determination of clinical outcome: assessing disability of the patient by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) | 0 - No symptoms. - No significant disability. Able to carry out all usual activities, despite some symptoms. - Slight disability. Able to look after own affairs without assistance, but unable to carry out all previous activities. - Moderate disability. Requires some help, but able to walk unassisted. - Moderately severe disability. Unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance, and unable to walk unassisted. - Severe disability. Requires constant nursing care and attention, bedridden, incontinent. - Dead. |
at 6 to 8 weeks follow-up | |
Secondary | Determination of clinical outcome: assessing disability of the patient by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) | 0 - No symptoms. - No significant disability. Able to carry out all usual activities, despite some symptoms. - Slight disability. Able to look after own affairs without assistance, but unable to carry out all previous activities. - Moderate disability. Requires some help, but able to walk unassisted. - Moderately severe disability. Unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance, and unable to walk unassisted. - Severe disability. Requires constant nursing care and attention, bedridden, incontinent. - Dead. |
at 6 months follow-up | |
Secondary | Determination of clinical outcome: assessing disability of the patient by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) | 0 - No symptoms. - No significant disability. Able to carry out all usual activities, despite some symptoms. - Slight disability. Able to look after own affairs without assistance, but unable to carry out all previous activities. - Moderate disability. Requires some help, but able to walk unassisted. - Moderately severe disability. Unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance, and unable to walk unassisted. - Severe disability. Requires constant nursing care and attention, bedridden, incontinent. - Dead. |
at 24 months follow-up | |
Secondary | Fisher grade (severity of intracranial SAH) for ruptured aneurysms. | Fisher grade: 1 No haemorrhage evident. 2 Subarachnoid haemorrhage less than 1mm thick. 3 Subarachnoid haemorrhage more than 1mm thick. 4 Subarachnoid haemorrhage of any thickness with intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) or parenchymal extension. |
at baseline | |
Secondary | Determination of technical success of the device | Technical success is defined as device deployment in the target aneurysm as intended by the investigator with adequate occlusion of the aneurysm (WOS A, B or C). | during index-procedure | |
Secondary | Determination of overall mortality | up to 24 months | ||
Secondary | Recording of intracranial haemorrhage during follow-up | up to 24 months | ||
Secondary | Recording the need for re-intervention during follow-up. | up to 24 months | ||
Secondary | Hunt and Hess scale (severity of clinical effect of SAH) for ruptured aneurysms. | Hunt and Hess scale: asymptomatic or minimal headache and slight neck stiffness, 70% survival moderate to severe headache; neck stiffness; no neurologic deficit except cranial nerve palsy; 60% survival drowsy; minimal neurologic deficit; 50% survival stuporous; moderate to severe hemiparesis; possibly early decerebrate rigidity and vegetative disturbances; 20% survival deep coma; decerebrate rigidity; moribund;10% survival |
baseline |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Terminated |
NCT03312725 -
Mid-term Data Collection of the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms With the WEB™ Aneurysm Embolization System
|