Amputation; Traumatic, Leg, Lower Clinical Trial
Official title:
Reliability and Construct Validity of the Turkish Version of the Prosthesis Donning and Doffing Questionnaire in Transtibial Amputees.
The aim of this study is to investigate the Reliability and construct validity of the Turkish version of the Prosthesis donning and doffing questionnaire in transtibial amputees.
Knowing that a socket and suspension system should be donned and doffed few times during the
day and night, it is important to measure ease of donning and doffing. Effortless donning and
doffing does appear to have a posi- tive effect on satisfaction with a prosthesis. The socket
and suspension systems require different methods of don and doff, some of which are
time-consuming and necessi- tate more hand strength and cognitive effort than others. The
pin/lock suspension needs few re-adjustments of residual limb within the socket so that the
pin is fully locked distally. The seal-in system, for example, needs a longer period as first
the amputee needs to spray either the inner socket or the seals, and then remove the socket
valve and push the limb into the socket and put back the valve. Instruments are available to
evaluate socket comfort such as the socket comfort score, yet to the authors' knowledge no
instrument has been developed that focuses on donning and doffing quality of prosthesis. The
clearer the insight into suspension systems, the easier will be the selection for
prosthetist.
There are different questionnaires in the fields of prosthetics and orthotics such as
Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ), Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience
Scales (TAPES), Orthotic Prosthetic User's Survey (OPUS), Houghton scale of prosthetic use,
and Amputee Body Image Scale (ABIS) However, few of these instruments address donning and
doffing of prosthesis. There is no questionnaire in Turkish available to evaluate the donning
and doffing procedures of suspension systems. Thus, the aim of this study is to investigate
the Reliability and construct validity of the Turkish version of the Prosthesis donning and
doffing questionnaire in transtibial amputees.
After obtaining permission from the developers of the Prosthesis donning and doffing
questionnaire, the Turkish version of the instrument will be developed. For the translation
process, established guidelines for patient reported outcome (PRO) instrument translation and
include both forward and backward (reverse) translation of instructions, items, and response
options by independent translators; review by bilingual experts; reconciliation of
translations; and cognitive testing of the translated instruments, as described by Eremenco
et al., 2005 or Reeve et al., 2013 were followed.The necessity of performing a cultural
adaptation for the use of the Turkish version among Turkish amputees will be assessed. Level
of education part of the manuscript is planned to be changed bacause it doesn't fit the
education system in Turkey). After discussions between the study investigators and
translators, a Turkish version of the Prosthesis donning and doffing questionnaire that
corresponded as closely as possible to the original survey will be produced. Each subject
will be asked to complete the Turkish version of the Prosthesis donning and doffing
questionnaire twice (1-3 days apart). To evaluate the validity of the Turkish version of the
Prosthesis donning and doffing questionnaire, the Nottingham Health Profile(NHP),
Satisfaction with Prosthesis -SATPRO surveys will be used.
Satisfaction with the prosthesis has the following subscales: aesthetic satisfaction with the
prosthesis, weight satisfaction with the prosthesis and functional satisfaction with the
prosthesis. The weight satisfaction subscale has just one item, which is answered with a
5-point Likert-type scale, whereas both aesthetic satisfaction and functional satisfaction
with prosthesis have five items, each answeredwith a 5-point Likert-type scale.
The Turkish version of Nottingham Health Profile(NHP), a generic quality of life measurement
tool, has been showed to be a valid and reliable outcome measurement. For this reason it will
be used to analyse the construct validity of the Prosthesis donning and doffing
questionnaire. NHP (translated by Küçükdeveci et a.) includes the following six subdomains:
energy level, physical activities, pain, sleep, emotional reaction and social isolation. The
sum of the scores of each subdomain equals.12 The SATPro is a 15-item questionnaire that
measures general satisfaction with a prosthesis. The Turkish version of the questionnaire,
developed by Simsek, was used. Each item on the questionnaire is scored between 0 and 3.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT06194838 -
Clinical Outcomes With Non-Powered vs. Powered Prosthetic Knees by K2-level Amputees
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04070105 -
No Power Bionic Lower Extremity Prosthesis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06284733 -
Whole-body Vibration Without Visual Feedback on Postural Steadiness in Unilateral Trans-femoral Traumatic Amputees
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05267639 -
Clinical Outcomes With Passive MPKs vs. Powered Prosthetic Knees
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06334146 -
Tap Dance for Adults With Lower Limb Amputation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06284005 -
Multicentre Interventional Pilot Study on the Evaluation of the Functionality, Safety and Reliability of a New Robotic Prosthesis for the Lower Limb at the Transfemoral Level
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06161961 -
Interventional Study on the Evaluation of Functionality, Safety of a Robotic Prosthesis for Transtibial Amputations
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06293443 -
Evaluation of Functionality of Amputees According to the Medicare Functional K Classification System
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04616378 -
Design, Prototyping, and Testing of a Robotic Prosthetic Leg
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04038580 -
A Comparative Assessment of Transfemoral Prosthetic Sockets
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04484805 -
Socket Cooling Effectiveness Take Home Study
|
N/A |