Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03302520
Other study ID # Nvmax_001
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date October 28, 2017
Est. completion date August 30, 2020

Study information

Verified date March 2022
Source Seoul National University Hospital
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The authors aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of CaO-SiO2-P2O5-B2O3 glass ceramics with PEEK cage that is widely used for posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) surgery in the clinical field.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 54
Est. completion date August 30, 2020
Est. primary completion date July 11, 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 30 Years to 80 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - patients aged between 30 and 80 - patients who required one-level PLIF between L1 and S1 among those who required an extensive laminectomy or facetectomy to correct severe disc extrusion or severe spinal stenosis or those who required PLIF due to grade I or II spondylolisthesis - those who (only if a signature was obtainable), or whose legal guardian, fully understood the clinical trial details and signed the informed consent form. Exclusion Criteria: - osteoporosis patients with average T-scores of L1-L4 at <-3.0 in DEXA bone density tests - women with positive pregnancy tests before the trial or who planned to become pregnant within the following 3 years - patients with a history of malignant tumor or malignant diseases (but the cases of cured disease with no relapse for the past 5 years were included in the present study) - patients with abnormal blood potassium and phosphorus levels; - patients with liver disease, kidney disease, respiratory disease, metabolic disease, or psychological disease; - patients deemed to have less than 1-year life expectancy; - patients with mental retardation or whose parents or legal guardians were older or had mental disabilities; - other patients viewed as inappropriate by the staff

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
NovoMax, BioAlpha Inc, Seong-nam, Korea
CaO-SiO2-P2O5-B2O3 glass ceramics spacer
PEEK cage
PEEK cage

Locations

Country Name City State
Korea, Republic of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Seongnam-si Gyounggido

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Seoul National University Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Korea, Republic of, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other Operation duration Intraoperative time Immediate after operation
Other Intraoperative blood loss Intraoperative blood loss Immediate after operation
Other Postoperative drainage Total drainage after surgery Within 3 days after operation
Other Amount of transfusion Total transfusion during and after surgery Within 7 days after operation
Primary Fusion rates This is assessed by postoperative computed tomography at 1 year after surgery up to 5 year after operation
Secondary Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) VAS is a measurement score that indicates pain severity status. VAS score comprised a 10-cm line with ''none'' (0) on one end of the scale and ''disabling pain'' (10) on the other. 3, 6, and 12, months, and every year, up to 5 year after operation
Secondary Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) The ODI is based on a self-administered questionnaire measuring ''back-specific function.'' The questionnaire comprises 10 items, each with 6 levels of response. Each item is scored from 0 to 5, and the total summation is converted to a 0-100 scale.20 The ODI scores ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating severe symptoms. 3, 6, and 12, months, and every year, up to 5 year after operation
Secondary EQ-5D EQ-5D is a standardized instrument developed by the EuroQol Group as a measure of health-related quality of life that can be used in a wide range of health conditions and treatments. The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. This can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the patient's own judgement. The scores on these five dimensions can be presented as a health profile or can be converted to a single summary index number (utility) reflecting preferability compared to other health profiles. 3, 6, and 12, months, and every year, up to 5 year after operation
Secondary PainDETECT The painDETECT Questionnaire (PDQ) is a screening tool designed to detect neuropathic pain in patients with chronic low back pain (LBP) based on self-reported pain characteristics. The degree of the seven types of pain quality, the type of pain pattern, and the presence of radiating pain. From the three components of the PDQ, a total score is calculated; a high score indicates that the pain is likely to have a neuropathic component. Scoring is performed using a scoring manual, and results in a final screening score: a score of 0-12 indicates nociceptive pain, 19-38 indicates neuropathic pain, and 13-18 indicates mixed pain. 3, 6, and 12, months, and every year, up to 5 year after operation
Secondary Fusion rates This is assessed by postoperative simple radiography at 1 year after surgery every year, up to 5 year after operation
Secondary Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0 Device related adverse events (fracture, translation, subsidence, osteolysis), Surgery related adverse events (incidental durotomy, wound infection, re-operation, re-admission) every year, up to 5 year after operation
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT02592642 - the Evaluation of Four Non-operative Treatments for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis N/A
Recruiting NCT05273346 - TCM Conservative Treatment for the Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis N/A
Recruiting NCT04469387 - Preventive Effect of Limited Decompression on Adjacent Segment Following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion N/A
Completed NCT03532945 - A Follow-up Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Novomax in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion N/A
Completed NCT03560401 - Is Postoperative Bracing Necessary After Spine Surgery for Degenerative Conditions N/A
Recruiting NCT06335511 - Decompression Versus Instrumented Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease. Clinical and Biomechanical Outcome Study
Not yet recruiting NCT06106061 - Effectiveness and Safety of the Facet Fixation (FFX®) Implant in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis N/A
Completed NCT03302507 - Biportal Endoscopy Spine Surgery (BESS )Versus Unilateral Laminotomy Bilateral Decompression (ULBD ): RCT, Non-inferiority Trial N/A
Completed NCT02644746 - Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis N/A
Completed NCT04406987 - Instability in the Lumbar Spine of Patients With Age Related Changes and Narrowing of the Spinal Canal (Spinal Stenosis)
Recruiting NCT04407338 - Efficacy and Tolerance Study of B-DYN Versus Conventional Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Stenosis on the Degree of Post-operative Functional Incapacity (BDYNCLIN) N/A
Recruiting NCT03553186 - Tranexamic Acid in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05645497 - Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of the FACET FIXation Implant.
Enrolling by invitation NCT04086784 - 3D-printed Porous Titanium Alloy Cages Versus PEEK Cages in Patients With Osteoporosis
Recruiting NCT05375201 - Clinical Decision-Making and Virtual Reality Exercise N/A
Completed NCT05203666 - Clinical and Radiological Outcomes Following Insertion of a Novel Removable Percutaneous Interspinous Process Spacer: an Initial Experience.
Recruiting NCT04467944 - Effect of Pre-existing Adjacent Segment Degeneration on Long-term Effectiveness After Lumbar Fusion Surgery
Active, not recruiting NCT03562936 - The NORDSTEN Studies/The Observational Cohort Study
Terminated NCT00627497 - DIAMâ„¢ Spinal Stabilization System vs. Decompression, Formerly vs. Posterolateral Fusion Phase 3
Completed NCT02121249 - Clinical Trial of Minimally Invasive Robotic Spine Surgery N/A