Clinical Trials Logo
  1. Home
  2. Other
  3. NCT03283280

Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Versus Indirect Nanohybrid Resin Composite Onlay Restorations.

Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity Clinical Trial

Official title:
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Restorations Versus Indirect Nanohybrid Resin Composite Onlay Restorations in Complex Proximal Cavities of Molars

Clinical Trial Summary

clinical performance of short fiber reinforced resin composite versus indirect nanohybrid resin composite onlay restorations in complex proximal cavities of molar teeth will be evaluated over one year.

Clinical Trial Description

Resin composite materials have been rapidly developed in the latest few years. Direct resin composite restorations become the golden standard for restoring intracoronal cavities. While for the extracoronal cavities, the indirect resin composite onlays tend to replace metallic restorations in most situations being more esthetic and conservative with lower cost (Rocca & Krejci, 2007).

Indirect resin composite onlays usually are lab processed in two appointments but it can be made in one appointment through CAD/CAM technology or by flexible model technique (semidirect technique).

These restorations offer more control on the proximal contacts and the anatomic form over the direct approach. Polymerization shrinkage occurs outside the patient mouth so the stresses are decreased and become limited to the width of the luting space. Annual failure rate (AFR) of indirect posterior resin composite restorations is up to 10% (Manhart et al, 2004).

One of the advancement in resin composite technology is the evolution of short fiber reinforced resin composite (SFRC) material that allows making a direct onlay restoration possible thus offers less procedural steps and saves more time (Garoushi et al, 2013).

This material is made to be used as a dentine substitute in the high stress-bearing areas. It is covered by a conventional resin composite filling to act as the enamel replacement this combination gives us a kind of biomimetic restoration. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

  • Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity
Clinical Trial Details
NCT number NCT03283280
Study type Interventional
Source Cairo University
Contact
Status Completed
Phase N/A
Start date February 1, 2018
Completion date July 1, 2019
View Details
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT03244124 - Different Application Strategies When Using Futurabond Universal in Class V Cavities N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT04630587 - Longevity of Dental Fillings Utilizing 3D Printing N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03657862 - Outcomes of Restoring Untreated and SDF-treated Dentine Caries Lesions in Primary Teeth of Preschool Children N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03645551 - Clinical Longevity of Ceramic Laminate Veneers
Recruiting NCT04838483 - Clinical Performance of Posterior Indirect Adhesive Restorations N/A
Withdrawn NCT03933176 - Absence of Liner Following the Selective Caries Removal (ALFSCaRe) N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03343184 - Clinical Evaluation of Bulk Fill Composite Restorations Associated to Universal Adhesive System N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06392685 - Composite Repair Using Silane Coupling Agent N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT03517124 - Ceramic Tooth Restorations - a Comparison Study N/A
Completed NCT06456619 - CAD-CAM or Adhesive Approaches for MIH Treatment N/A
Completed NCT05125900 - Clinical Evaluation of Subgingival Open Sandwich Restorations N/A
Completed NCT03515265 - Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced Composite Versus Microhybrid Composite Restorations N/A
Terminated NCT02572570 - Clinical Investigation of a New Bulk Fill Composite Resin in the Restoration of Posterior Teeth N/A
Recruiting NCT06164418 - Comparative Evaluation of Class V Restorations N/A
Recruiting NCT04293770 - Clinical Evaluation of Posterior Indirect Adhesive Restorations N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT06183320 - Can Flowable Bulk Fill Composites be Used in Proximal Area of Class II Restorations N/A
Completed NCT04306549 - Twenty-Four-Month Clinical Comparison of Two Bulk-Fill and Microhybrid Composite Restorations N/A
Completed NCT05551130 - Could Bulk Fill Glass Hybrid Restorative Materials Replace Composite Resins in Treating Permanent Teeth? N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03924830 - Influence of Surface Sealants on the Quality of Posterior Restorations With Bulk Fill Composites N/A
Completed NCT02948686 - Different Application Strategies When Using Ambar Universal in Class V Cavities N/A