Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity Clinical Trial
— FUUCOfficial title:
Clinical Evaluation of Different Application Strategies When Using a Futurabond Universal Adhesive System in Class V Cavities
Verified date | December 2023 |
Source | Universidade Federal Fluminense |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Treatment clinical trial, randomized, controled, parallel, double-blinded, with four groups, that aims to evaluate the best application strategy when using a new Universal Adhesive system, Futurabond Universal (VOCO GmbH, Germany). Volunteers will be selected and recruited,following inclusion criteria and pre-established exclusion. All volunteers will be informed and sign a term of clarification and consent. 50 enrolled patients will receive 200 Class V dental restorations, made in four different ways, one from each experimental group, using the same universal self-etching adhesive system, which is the tested material in this study. Non-carious cervical lesions will receive the applied adhesive system in 4 different protocols separated by groups. Group Self Etching (SET) (control): no conditioning, the adhesive system will be used in 50 teeth, according to the manufacturer's instructions, in the self-etching mode. The adhesive system will be brushed during 20 seconds in the cavity, will be air-dried during 5 seconds, and activated during 10 seconds with Light Emission Diode (LED) light; Group SEE (Selective enamel etching): 37% phosphoric acid will be applied during 30 seconds, only in enamel in 50 teeth. This acid will be removed using water, the cavity will be air-dried, and then, the adhesive will be applied according to the manufacturer's instructions, as described in group SET; Group ERDry (Etch& Rinse Dry): 37% phosphoric acid will be applied during 30 seconds, only in enamel and during 15 seconds only in dentin, in 50 teeth. This acid will be removed using water, the cavity will be air-dried, keeping dentin dry, and then, the adhesive will be applied according to the manufacturer's instructions, as described in group SET; Group ERWet (Etch& Rinse Wet): 37% phosphoric acid will be applied during 30 seconds, only in enamel and during 15 seconds only in dentin, in 50 teeth. This acid will be removed using water, the cavity will be air-dried, keeping dentin wet, and then, the adhesive will be applied according to the manufacturer's instructions, as described in group SET. After applying the adhesive, the restorations will be made with composite resin, and evaluated every 6 months for pain assessment, shape, staining or recurrent caries, using scores. To determine in which group each tooth will be enrolled, the authors will randomize the teeth.
Status | Active, not recruiting |
Enrollment | 50 |
Est. completion date | November 30, 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | May 31, 2017 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 70 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - All patients must have at only 20 teeth in function, must have at only 2 non carious cervical lesions (NCCL), in different teeth, that need restoration. Those lesions must be non carious, must be more than 1 mm deep, should have exposed dentin, and must have at only 50% of margins in enamel. Teeth should not present periodontal mobility. Exclusion Criteria: - Volunteers with periodontal disease; with gingival bleeding; use of anti-inflammatory drugs in the last 30 days. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Brazil | Universidade Federal Fluminense - School of Dentistry | Nova Friburgo | RIO DE Janeiro |
Brazil | Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa | Ponta Grossa | Paraná |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Universidade Federal Fluminense | Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa |
Brazil,
da Costa TR, Ferri LD, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Eighteen-month randomized clinical trial on the performance of two etch-and-rinse adhesives in non-carious cervical lesions. Am J Dent. 2014 Dec;27(6):312-7. — View Citation
Dalton Bittencourt D, Ezecelevski IG, Reis A, Van Dijken JW, Loguercio AD. An 18-months' evaluation of self-etch and etch & rinse adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. Acta Odontol Scand. 2005 Jun;63(3):173-8. doi: 10.1080/00016350510019874. — View Citation
Erhardt MC, Cavalcante LM, Pimenta LA. Influence of phosphoric acid pretreatment on self-etching bond strengths. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2004;16(1):33-40; discussion 41. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2004.tb00448.x. — View Citation
Erickson RL, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA. The role of etching in bonding to enamel: a comparison of self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems. Dent Mater. 2009 Nov;25(11):1459-67. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.07.002. Epub 2009 Aug 7. — View Citation
Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjor I, Bayne S, Peters M, Hiller KA, Randall R, Vanherle G, Heintze SD. FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations-update and clinical examples. Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Aug;14(4):349-66. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0432-8. Epub 2010 Jul 14. — View Citation
Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjor IA, Peters M, Rousson V, Randall R, Schmalz G, Tyas M, Vanherle G. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Int Dent J. 2007 Oct;57(5):300-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595x.2007.tb00136.x. No abstract available. — View Citation
Lopes LS, Calazans FS, Hidalgo R, Buitrago LL, Gutierrez F, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Barceleiro MO. Six-month Follow-up of Cervical Composite Restorations Placed With a New Universal Adhesive System: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Oper Dent. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):465-480. doi: 10.2341/15-309-C. Epub 2016 Jul 5. — View Citation
Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II: etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater. 2001 Sep;17(5):430-44. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(00)00104-4. — View Citation
Perdigao J, Kose C, Mena-Serrano AP, De Paula EA, Tay LY, Reis A, Loguercio AD. A new universal simplified adhesive: 18-month clinical evaluation. Oper Dent. 2014 Mar-Apr;39(2):113-27. doi: 10.2341/13-045-C. Epub 2013 Jun 26. — View Citation
Swift EJ Jr, Perdigao J, Heymann HO, Wilder AD Jr, Bayne SC, May KN Jr, Sturdevant JR, Roberson TM. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of a filled and unfilled dentin adhesive. J Dent. 2001 Jan;29(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(00)00050-6. — View Citation
Torii Y, Itou K, Nishitani Y, Ishikawa K, Suzuki K. Effect of phosphoric acid etching prior to self-etching primer application on adhesion of resin composite to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent. 2002 Oct;15(5):305-8. — View Citation
Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, De Munck J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Extension of a one-step self-etch adhesive into a multi-step adhesive. Dent Mater. 2006 Jun;22(6):533-44. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.05.010. Epub 2005 Nov 21. — View Citation
* Note: There are 12 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Restoration Loss | It will be evaluated the increase in the number of losses of dental restorations in the period of four years, verified by periodic visual clinical examination (6/6 months) based on the statement of difference of at least 25% in the amount of remaining restorations in the different groups. | Four years | |
Secondary | Marginal Pigmentation | It will be evaluated the increase in the number of dental restorations with marginal pigmentation in the period of four years, verified by periodic clinical visual examination (6/6 months) based on the statement of difference of at least 25% in the amount of stained restorations in the different groups. | Four years | |
Secondary | Post-Operative Hypersensitivity | It will be evaluated the increase in the number of dental restorations with dentin hypersensitivity in the period of four years, verified by periodic clinical examination (6/6 months) based on the statement of difference of at least 25% in the amount of restorations with dentin hypersensitivity in the different groups. | Four years | |
Secondary | Secondary Caries | It will be evaluated the increase in the number of dental restorations with secondary caries in the period of four years, verified by periodic radiographic examination (6/6 months) based on the statement of difference of at least 25% in the amount of restorations with secondary caries in the different groups. | Four years |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT04630587 -
Longevity of Dental Fillings Utilizing 3D Printing
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03657862 -
Outcomes of Restoring Untreated and SDF-treated Dentine Caries Lesions in Primary Teeth of Preschool Children
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03645551 -
Clinical Longevity of Ceramic Laminate Veneers
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04838483 -
Clinical Performance of Posterior Indirect Adhesive Restorations
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03933176 -
Absence of Liner Following the Selective Caries Removal (ALFSCaRe)
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03343184 -
Clinical Evaluation of Bulk Fill Composite Restorations Associated to Universal Adhesive System
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06392685 -
Composite Repair Using Silane Coupling Agent
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT03517124 -
Ceramic Tooth Restorations - a Comparison Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06456619 -
CAD-CAM or Adhesive Approaches for MIH Treatment
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05125900 -
Clinical Evaluation of Subgingival Open Sandwich Restorations
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03515265 -
Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced Composite Versus Microhybrid Composite Restorations
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03283280 -
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Versus Indirect Nanohybrid Resin Composite Onlay Restorations.
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02572570 -
Clinical Investigation of a New Bulk Fill Composite Resin in the Restoration of Posterior Teeth
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06164418 -
Comparative Evaluation of Class V Restorations
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04293770 -
Clinical Evaluation of Posterior Indirect Adhesive Restorations
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06183320 -
Can Flowable Bulk Fill Composites be Used in Proximal Area of Class II Restorations
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04306549 -
Twenty-Four-Month Clinical Comparison of Two Bulk-Fill and Microhybrid Composite Restorations
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05551130 -
Could Bulk Fill Glass Hybrid Restorative Materials Replace Composite Resins in Treating Permanent Teeth?
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03924830 -
Influence of Surface Sealants on the Quality of Posterior Restorations With Bulk Fill Composites
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02948686 -
Different Application Strategies When Using Ambar Universal in Class V Cavities
|
N/A |