Ultrasound Guidance Versus Anatomical Landmarks for CVC Catheterisation:

Success Rate for Subclavian or Femoral Vein Catetherisation Clinical Trial

Official title:

Ultrasound Guidance Versus Anatomical Landmarks for Succlavic and Femoral Vein Catheterisation: an Observational Prospective Study

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03207932
• Other study ID #: UPisa - subclavian/femoral
• Status: Completed
• Start date: May 10, 2018
• Est. completion date: October 10, 2019

Study information

• Verified date: November 2020
• Source: University of Pisa
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

Clinical Trial Summary

anatomical landmarks on the body surface were used to insert central vein catheter. However, ultrasound technique is emerging as a new technique for vein catheterisation. For subclavian and femoral vein catheterisation, up to now, there is a lack of evidence of the superiority of one technique over the other.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 200
• Est. completion date: October 10, 2019
• Est. primary completion date: January 10, 2019
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• patients needing CVC

Exclusion Criteria:

• refusal of consent

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Success Rate for Subclavian or Femoral Vein Catetherisation

Intervention

Procedure:
• Central vein catheterisation
ultrasound guided versus landmark central vein catheterisation

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Italy	Francesco Forfori	Pisa

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Pisa

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Italy, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	The success rate for succlavic or femoral vein catetherisation using ultrasound versus landmark technique at the first attempt	success rate	during catheterization procedure