Contraceptive Device; Complications Clinical Trial
Official title:
Benefits of Use of 600 Microgram Misoprostol Vaginally Prior To Insertion Of An Intrauterine Device in Patients With Cesarean Scar: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Groups of study:
120 candidates for Cu T 380A IUD insertion were enrolled in the study. They were divided into
two groups: Group 1: Sixty women received 600 micrograms of misoprostol vaginally as deep as
possible six hours before IUD insertion.
Group 2: Sixty women received the placebo vaginally. The placebo and misoprostol were put in
120 numbered closed envelopes according to the table of random numbers and an envelope was
allocated to each patient accordingly.
Methodology:
All patients were subjected to the following:
(i) Complete history taking (ii) Proper counseling: (iv) Examination: (v) 600ug misoprostol
(3tablets Misotac®, ( Sigma Pharmaceutical Industries, Egypt )or placebo were administered
Vaginally as deep as possible 6 hours before insertion of the IUD by gynecologist .
(vi) Insertion of IUD: (TCu-380A®,Pregna International Ltd, India ) After full history taken
, Proper counseling, Informed consent is taken from each patients, examination ( general ,
abdominal and pelvic )to exclude any pathology .
A careful bimanual examination was done prior to IUD insertion. The cervix was exposed by
introducing a vaginal speculum, the cervix and vaginal vault were cleaned with povidone-
iodine solution.
The Next step was to sound and measure the depth of the uterus. The IUD was folded into the
insertion tube immediately prior to insertion. The cervix was grasped with a tenaculum, and
gently pulled downward to straighten the angle of flection.
The insertion tube was advanced into the uterus to the correct depth as marked on the tube by
a sliding plastic flange.
The outer sheath of the insert was withdrawn a short distance to release the arms of the T
and was then gently pushed inward again to elevate the opened T against the fundus of uterus
.
The inserter tube was then removed. Then strings were cut to project about 2-4 cm from the
external cervical os.
Groups of study:
120 candidates for Cu T 380A IUD insertion were enrolled in the study. They were divided into
two groups: Group 1: Sixty women received 600 micrograms of misoprostol vaginally as deep as
possible six hours before IUD insertion.
Group 2: Sixty women received the placebo vaginally. The placebo and misoprostol were put in
120 numbered closed envelopes according to the table of random numbers and an envelope was
allocated to each patient accordingly.
Methods of randomization:
To insure that everyone had an equal chance of participation, randomization was guided by
table of random numbers using computer generated system(SPSS: windous version8) (SPSS Inc.,
Chicago, USA) double blinding technique was used thus; the investigator and the patient
didn't know the group to which the patient was allocated.
Methodology:
All patients were subjected to the following:
(i) Complete history taking:
- Full history taking.
- Obstetric history.
- Menstrual history.
- Medical history. Data were collected in a special form for each patient. (ii) Proper
counseling: Proper counseling of each patient about different types of IUDs, the
advantage and side effects of each type, explanation of the menstrual pattern changes,
assuring the patient that these changes are very common and that it will disappear after
a period of time after insertion.
(iii) Consent: Informed consent is taken from each patients . (iv) Examination:
1. General examination.
2. Abdominal examination.
3. Pelvic examination to exclude pelvic pathology .
(v) 600ug misoprostol (3tablets Misotac®, ( Sigma Pharmaceutical Industries, Egypt )or
placebo ( stugeron®, Mina Pharm. under licence Janssen Pharmaceutica, Egypt ) were
administered Vaginally as deep as possible 6 hours before insertion of the IUD by
gynecologist .
(vi) Insertion of IUD: (TCu-380A®,Pregna International Ltd, India ) After full history
taken , Proper counseling, Informed consent is taken from each patients, examination (
general , abdominal and pelvic )to exclude any pathology .
A careful bimanual examination was done prior to IUD insertion. The cervix was exposed
by introducing a vaginal speculum, the cervix and vaginal vault were cleaned with
povidone- iodine solution.
The Next step was to sound and measure the depth of the uterus. The IUD was folded into
the insertion tube immediately prior to insertion. The cervix was grasped with a
tenaculum, and gently pulled downward to straighten the angle of flection.
The insertion tube was advanced into the uterus to the correct depth as marked on the
tube by a sliding plastic flange.
The outer sheath of the insert was withdrawn ashort distance to release the arms of the
T and was then gently pushed inward again to elevate the opened T against the fundus of
uterus .
The inserter tube was then removed. Then strings were cut to project about 2-4 cm from
the external cervical os.
Post insertion instructions:
Palpation of strings should be performed monthly by the patient to verify continuing
presence of the IUD after each menstrual flow. Caution the patient that the first 2
menses are typically heavier.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03438682 -
Real World Effectiveness and Safety of Hysteroscopic (Essure®) Compared to Laparoscopic Sterilization
|
||
Completed |
NCT03281564 -
Quality of Life After Laparoscopic Removal of Essure®
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06355713 -
Improvement of Symptoms After Removal of the Essure® Contraceptive Implant
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06000423 -
Tranexamic Acid to Reduce Contraceptive-related Bleeding Side Effects
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06203080 -
The Contraceptive Efficacy and Safety of an Intravaginal Acetic Acid Thermoreversible Gel on Chinese Women.
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03623126 -
Impact of ESSURE Devices Withdrawal on the Symptomatology of Patients
|