Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03048006
Other study ID # DGD-55-005
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received February 1, 2017
Last updated February 7, 2017
Start date January 2011
Est. completion date December 2013

Study information

Verified date February 2017
Source Guerbet
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Guerbet conducted a non-interventional post-marketing surveillance study on its Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) contrast agent Dotarem (gadoteric acid/gadoterate meglumine). The aim of this study, which was conducted in accordance with section 67, paragraph 6 of the German drug regulation, Arzneimittelgesetz, was to gain additional insights into the diagnostic efficacy, reliability and safety of Dotarem in routine practice using the most up-to-date MRI techniques and application methods.


Description:

Diagnostic efficacy was assessed by the following endpoints: diagnostic value ("yes"/"no") and imaging quality (5-step scale from "excellent" to "very poor"). Safety was evaluated on the basis of the frequency and seriousness of adverse events that occurred following Dotarem injection.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 44456
Est. completion date December 2013
Est. primary completion date December 2013
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group N/A to 100 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients undergoing routine MRI using the MRI contrast medium Dotarem

Exclusion Criteria:

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms

  • Contrast-enhanced MRI With Dotarem

Intervention

Procedure:
MRI with Dotarem


Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Guerbet

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Frequency of adverse events From the beginning of the MRI procedure to 30-60 min after
Secondary Diagnostic value Diagnostic value was evaluated by answering "yes" or "no" to the following question "Were you able to make a diagnosis based on the test results ?" During MRI procedure
Secondary Image quality Image quality was evaluated with a 5-step scale from "excellent" to "very poor" ("excellent/very good"; "good"; "average"; "poor" and "very poor") During MRI procedure