Non-transfusion-dependent Thalassemia Clinical Trial
— JupiterOfficial title:
Open-label, Multicenter, Single Arm, Phase II Study Assessing Treatment Patient Preference for New Deferasirox Formulation (Film-coated Tablet) Compared to the Reference Deferasirox Dispersible Tablet Formulation
Verified date | September 2021 |
Source | Novartis |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Study to evaluate patient preference of deferasirox film-coated tablet (FCT) or deferasirox dispersible tablet (DT) in patient with transfusion - dependent thalassemia or non-transfusion -dependent thalassemia as measured by preference questionnaire at Week 48
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 148 |
Est. completion date | March 11, 2021 |
Est. primary completion date | January 29, 2020 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 2 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Prior to any screening procedures were performed, written informed consent/assent must be provided. For pediatric patients, consent was obtained from parent(s) or legal patient's representative. Investigators also obtained assent of patients according to local, regional or national guidelines. 2. Male and female patient aged = 2 years 3. Deferasirox naïve patient or chelated naive patient or treated by other chelators for at least 6 months, such as: 1. Deferiprone/ DFP 2. Deferoxamine /DFO 3. Combination (DFO + DFP) 4. Subject was willing to discontinue current iron chelation therapy at least 5 days prior to study day 1 and for the duration of the study 5. Patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia (independent of underlying condition) with transfusional iron overload as shown by a serum ferritin level of > 1000 ng/ml at screening and if available, LIC > 3 mg Fe/g dw within 6 months prior to screening 6. Patients with non-transfusion-dependent thalassemia with iron overload as shown by a serum ferritin level of = 800 ng/ml at screening and if available, LIC = 5 mg Fe/g dw within 6 months prior to screening Exclusion Criteria: 1. Creatinine clearance below the contraindication limit in the locally approved prescribing information. 2. Serum creatinine level > 1.5 x ULN (upper limit of normal) 3. AST (SGOT) /ALT (SGPT) > 5 x ULN, unless LIC confirmed as >10 mg Fe/dw within 6 months prior to screening visit. 4. Significant proteinuria as indicated by a urinary protein/creatinine ratio > 0.5 mg/mg in a non-first void urine sample. 5. Patients with significant impaired gastrointestinal (GI) function or GI disease that might significantly alter the absorption of oral deferasirox (e.g. ulcerative diseases, uncontrolled nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, malabsorption syndrome, or small bowel resection). 6. Clinical or laboratory evidence of active Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C (HBsAg in the absence of HBsAb OR HCV Ab positive with HCV RNA positive). 7. Patients with psychiatric or addictive disorders which prevent them from giving their informed consent or undergoing any of the treatment options or patients unwilling or unable to comply with the protocol 8. Patients with a known history of HIV seropositivity (Elisa or Western blot). 9. History of malignancy of any organ system, treated or untreated, within the past 5 years whether or not there is evidence of local recurrence or metastases, with the exception of localized basal cell carcinoma of the skin. 10. Patients participating in another clinical trial or receiving an investigational drug. Patients who have recently completed treatment with an investigational product must have ceased this treatment for at least five times the half-life of the investigational product. 11. History of hypersensitivity to any of the study drug or excipients. 12. Significant medical condition interfering with the ability to partake in this study (e.g. systemic uncontrolled hypertension, unstable cardiac disease not controlled by standard medical therapy, systemic disease (cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, etc.). 13. Women of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, unless they were using effective methods of contraception during dosing of study treatment 14. Women were considered post-menopausal and not of child bearing potential if they had had 12 months of natural (spontaneous) amenorrhea with an appropriate clinical profile (e.g. age appropriate, history of vasomotor symptoms) or had had surgical bilateral oophorectomy (with or without hysterectomy) or tubal ligation at least six weeks ago. In the case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman had been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment is she considered not of child bearing potential. 15. Sexually active males unless they used a condom during intercourse while taking drug and for 28 days after stopping study medication and should not father a child in this period. A condom was required to be used also by vasectomized men in order to prevent delivery of the drug via seminal fluid. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Egypt | Novartis Investigative Site | Alexandria | |
Egypt | Novartis Investigative Site | Cairo | |
Egypt | Novartis Investigative Site | Zagazig | |
Lebanon | Novartis Investigative Site | Hazmiyeh | Beirut |
Morocco | Novartis Investigative Site | Rabat | |
Saudi Arabia | Novartis Investigative Site | Al Ahsa | SAU |
Saudi Arabia | Novartis Investigative Site | Jeddah | |
Saudi Arabia | Novartis Investigative Site | Jeddah | |
Saudi Arabia | Novartis Investigative Site | Riyadh | |
Thailand | Novartis Investigative Site | Bangkok | |
Thailand | Novartis Investigative Site | Bangkok noi | Bangkok |
Thailand | Novartis Investigative Site | Bangkoknoi | Bangkok |
Turkey | Novartis Investigative Site | Ankara | |
Turkey | Novartis Investigative Site | Antalya | |
Turkey | Novartis Investigative Site | Istanbul | |
Vietnam | Novartis Investigative Site | Hanoi | |
Vietnam | Novartis Investigative Site | Ho Chi Minh City |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Novartis Pharmaceuticals |
Egypt, Lebanon, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, Thailand, Turkey, Vietnam,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Number of Participants Preferring Deferasirox FCT or DT at Week 48 Based on Preference Questionnaire (Item 2) | Number of participants preferring deferasirox FCT or DT as measured by preference questionnaire (item 2) at Week 48. The preference questionnaire was a 3-item questionnaire. At Week 48, the second item of the preference questionnaire asked the patients (or parents of young patients from 2 to 9 years old) which medicine did the patient "like best": "Tablet to dissolve in liquid" (=deferasirox DT), "Film coated tablet" (=deferasirox FCT), "Sprinkle powder on food" (=deferasirox FCT) and "I don't know" (=none of the above). The number of participants who selected each response option for item 2 was assessed. The analysis was performed for participants who answered the item 2 of the preference questionnaire. | Week 48 | |
Secondary | Number of Participants Preferring Deferasirox FCT, Deferasirox DT or Previous Iron Chelation Therapy at Week 28 Based on Preference Questionnaire (Item 2) | Number of participants preferring deferasirox FCT, deferasirox DT or previous iron chelation therapy as measured by preference questionnaire (item 2) at Week 28. The preference questionnaire was a 3-item questionnaire. At Week 28, the second item of this questionnaire asked the patients (or parents of young patients from 2 to 9 years old) which medicine did the patient "like best": "Tablet to dissolve in liquid" (=deferasirox DT), "Film coated tablet (taken once a day)" (=deferasirox FCT), "Sprinkle powder on food" (=deferasirox FCT), "Tablet (taken 3 times a day)" (=previous iron chelation therapy), "Injection" (=previous iron chelation therapy) and "I don't know" (=none of the above). The number of participants who selected each response option for item 2 was assessed. This analysis was performed only for patients who had received iron chelation therapy prior to enrolling in the study and who answered the item 2 of the preference questionnaire. | Week 28 | |
Secondary | Number of Participants Preferring Deferasirox DT or Previous Iron Chelation Therapy at Week 4 and Week 24 Based on Preference Questionnaire (Item 2) | Number of participants preferring deferasirox DT or previous iron chelation therapy as measured by preference questionnaire (item 2) at Week 4 and 24. The preference questionnaire was a 3-item questionnaire. At Week 4 and 24, the second item of the preference questionnaire asked the patients (or parents of young patients from 2 to 9 years old) which medicine did the patient "like best": "Tablet to dissolve in liquid" (=deferasirox DT), "Tablet (taken 3 times a day)" (=previous iron chelation therapy), "Injection" (=previous iron chelation therapy) and "I don't know" (=none of the above). The number of participants who selected each response option for item 2 was assessed. This analysis was performed only for patients who had received iron chelation therapy prior to enrolling in the study and who answered item 2 of the preference questionnaire. | Week 4 and Week 24 | |
Secondary | Number of Participants Selecting Each Reason for Treatment Preference as Assessed by the Preference Questionnaire at Week 28 and Week 48 | The preference questionnaire was a 3 item questionnaire. The first item asked the patients (or parents of young patients from 2 to 9 years old) which medicine they were taking. The second item asked which of the medicines did the patient "Like best". Finally, the third item asked the patient why he/she preferred the medicine they chose in the second item. The number of participants who selected each response option for item 3 was assessed. Participants could select multiple reasons for treatment preference at each timepoint. | Week 28 and Week 48 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Consumed Tablet Counts During Deferasirox DT and Deferasirox FCT Treatment Periods | The percentage of consumed tablet counts (compliance) was calculated for each treatment period in the core phase: deferasirox DT (period 1) and deferasirox FCT (period 2). Compliance was defined as the total tablet count consumed divided by total tablet count prescribed and multiplied by 100. Total tablet count consumed was calculated as total number of tablets dispensed minus total number of tablets lost/wasted or returned. Total tablet count prescribed was calculated as the number of tablets that the patient should have taken during this period. If a patient did not return the study drug, the compliance was not calculated. | Deferasirox DT: From Baseline up to Week 24. Deferasirox FCT: From Week 25 up to Week 48 | |
Secondary | Change Over Time in Aftertaste Score of Palatability Questionnaire | The palatability questionnaire consisted of 4 items, three items measuring taste and one item measuring aftertaste. The aftertaste item scored on a 5-point response scale with the response option: Very good = 1, Good = 2, Neither good nor bad = 3, Bad = 4, Very bad = 5. This item offered an additional response option of "no aftertaste". The aftertaste score was calculated among participants who had an aftertaste. Higher aftertaste scores indicated a worse aftertaste.
For participants less than (<) 10 years old, an observer palatability questionnaire was administered. Items and scoring algorithm remained the same as for participants greater than or equal to (=) 10 years old. Change in aftertaste score over time was assessed |
Week 4, 24, 28 and 48 | |
Secondary | Change Over Time in Palatability Score of Palatability Questionnaire | The palatability questionnaire consisted of 4 items, three items measuring taste and one item measuring aftertaste. Among the taste items, first one measured taste on a 5-point response scale. The other two items measured what happened after taking the medicine and how the perceived amount of liquid taken with the medicine was. Responses to these 3 items were combined and converted into a single palatability score using a scoring matrix: each combination of responses on each of 3 items corresponded to a predefined palatability score. E.g. if a participant responded "bad" to item 1, "vomited <30min" to item 2 and "not enough" to item 3, then the palatability score assigned was 0. This score ranged from 0 to 11; higher scores indicated better palatability. For participants <10 years old, an observer palatability questionnaire was administered. Items and scoring algorithm were the same as for participants =10 years old. Change in palatability score over time was assessed | Week 4, 24, 28 and 48 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Adherence Domain Score of Modified Satisfaction With Iron Chelation (mSICT) Questionnaire | The mSICT patient reported outcome (PRO) consisted of 15 items that represented 3 domains: Adherence, Preference, and Concerns. The adherence domain score consisted of 6 adherence items, measured using a 5-point response scale. The adherence score was calculated by summing these 6 items, with scores ranging from 6 to 30. Higher scores indicated worse adherence.
For participants <10 years old, an observer version (ObsRO) was administered. The adherence score remained the same as for participants =10 years old. |
Baseline (week 2 or, if missing, week 3), week 24, 28 and 48 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Preference Domain Score of Modified Satisfaction With Iron Chelation (mSICT) Questionnaire | The mSICT patient reported outcome (PRO) consisted of 15 items that represented 3 domains: Adherence, Preference, and Concerns.
The preference/satisfaction domain score consisted of 2 preference/satisfaction items, measured using a 5-point response scale. The preference score was calculated by summing these 2 items, with scores ranging from 2 to 10. Higher scores indicated worse satisfaction. For participants < 10 years old, an observer version (ObsRO) was administered. Preference score remained the same as for participants = 10 years old. |
Baseline (week 2 or, if missing, week 3), week 24, 28 and 48 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Concerns Domain Score of Modified Satisfaction With Iron Chelation (mSICT) Questionnaire | The mSICT patient reported outcome (PRO) consisted of 15 items that represented 3 domains: Adherence, Preference, and Concerns.
The concerns domain score consisted of 3 items to address any concerns or worries with the medication. All 3 items were measured on a 5-point response scale. The concerns score was calculated by summing the 3 items, with scores ranging from 3 to 15. Higher scores indicated fewer concerns. For participants < 10 years old, an observer version (ObsRO) was administered. Concerns score remained the same as for participants = 10 years old. |
Baseline (week 2 or, if missing, week 3), week 24, 28 and 48 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptom Score Based on GI Questionnaire | The GI symptom score was calculated from responses to 5 questions of the GI questionnaire, each with a possible score of 1 to 5, for an overall possible score range of 5 to 25, where a lower score represents a less severe GI symptom and a higher score represents a more severe GI symptom.
An observer GI symptom questionnaire was administered to those patients who were < 10 years old. The questionnaire was completed by the parents of the participants. All items and the scoring algorithm remained the same as for participants = 10 years old. |
Baseline (week -1 or, if missing, week -2), week 24, 28 and 48 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Serum Ferritin Levels | Absolute change from baseline over time in serum ferritin levels | From Baseline (Day 1) up to 96 weeks |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04515680 -
Endocrine Function During Deferasirox Therapy
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06299670 -
Efficacy of Combination of Hdroxyurea and Thalidomide Over Either Hydroxyurea or Thalidomide Alone in the Treatment of Transfusion Dependent Thalassemia in Children: A Quasi-Randomised Clinical Trial
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT06098014 -
Safety & Efficacy of Thalidomide in Children With Transfusion Dependent Thalassemia
|
Phase 1 |