Low Back Pain Clinical Trial
Official title:
Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection in Conjunction With Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment of the Lumbar Dorsal Root Ganglion for the Management of Chronic Lumbosacral Radicular Pain: a Randomized, Double-blind Trial
The purpose of this study is to examine the potential changes in levels of pain, quality of
life (QoL) and activities of daily living (ADL) observed when transforaminal epidural
steroid injection is administered in conjunction with pulsed radiofrequency treatment of the
lumbar dorsal root ganglion during the initial 3 months follow-up period. Safety (monitoring
side effects) of the treatment is determined.
The study hypothesis is that the application of transforaminal epidural steroid injection
(TFESI) in conjunction with pulsed radiofrequency treatment (PRF) treatment of the lumbar
dorsal root ganglion would increase the treatment response of PRF and thereby provide a
measurable difference in the pain scores, quality of life and activities of daily living for
the patients suffering from chronic lumbosacral radicular pain.
The study sample:
120 (one hundred and twenty) patients diagnosed with chronic lumbosacral radicular pain were
elected by their pain specialists to undergo pulsed radiofrequency treatment adjacent to
lumbosacral dorsal root ganglion(s). A patient with radicular pain affecting more than one
segment on one side will be treated for all the involved segments with the same technique
and this will be considered a single intervention for the study.
60 (sixty) patients (the experimental Celestone group) undergoing pulsed radiofrequency
treatment will receive transforaminal epidural injection of the solution of 1 cc of
Lidocaine 1% with 1 cc of Celestone Chronodose around each dorsal root ganglion immediately
after the radiofrequency treatment has been performed. 60 (sixty) patients (the control
group) undergoing pulsed radiofrequency treatment will receive transforaminal epidural
injection of the solution of 1 cc of Lidocaine 1% with 1 cc of normal saline around each
dorsal root ganglion immediately after the radiofrequency treatment will be performed.
Randomization and blinding:
Patients will be randomly assigned to the Celestone group (N = 60) or the control group (N =
60). The allocation of patients into either group will be performed using a
computer-generated randomization program. Each patient's randomization number will be
concealed until the end of the study from both the patients and the outcome assessor, who
will be an independent research coordinator at the investigators pain clinic. The patients
will be explained that they will not know which medicine they will receive until the study
completion.
Procedure:
The study will take place in the Chaim Sheba TelHashomer Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Participants will be recruited from the hospital's Pain Management outpatient clinic from
the patients eligible for the procedure involving pulsed radiofrequency of the lumbosacral
dorsal root ganglion. After receiving the hospital's Helsinki approval, the P.I. and/or
other designated staff in the department will approach relevant patients (in line with the
mentioned inclusion and exclusion criteria), describe the procedure, inform of the possible
adverse events and collect informed consent if the patients are interested in participating.
Consent will be obtained from the patient during the patient's visit when the option of RF
is agreed upon and scheduled for the future.
Eligible patients will not receive any financial reimbursement. It will be stressed to
prospective subjects that participation in the research will have no implications on their
treatment in the hospital, or the relationship with their current healthcare providers. The
patients will be advised that they may unconditionally revoke their consent at any given
time during participation without repercussion on future care. For the first month after the
procedure, patients will be instructed not to change their previously prescribed analgesic
medications. All patients will be made aware of this guideline prior to study participation.
After the first month follow-up visit, the prescribed doses of any analgesics will be
increased or decreased in regard to the pain intensity of the patient. Patients who will
have increments in analgesic medication or who will be elected for alternative treatments
will be considered treatment failure. Data collected during the experiment will be kept in a
secure location and will be shredded after the project's completion. All information
regarding patients treatment both inside and outside of the project will be kept in the
utmost of confidentiality, respecting both legal and ethical constraints.
Patients agreeing to participate in the study will come to the pre-operative room of the
Pain Department at the designated time. There they will be monitored, initial intensity of
the pain (0 to 10) on the numerical rating scale (NRS) will be recorded and pre-operative
vital signs assessed (e.g.- blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation). Each patient
will complete the Roland Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Index score.
All syringes with the solutions to be injected by the transforaminal approach will be
prepared prior to entering the operating room. After that the patient will enter the
operating room to undergo pulsed radiofrequency treatment. The patient will sign consent for
the procedure. The patient will be placed in the prone position with a pillow under the
lower abdomen to provide an easy transforaminal approach. It will be forbidden to call name
or the dose of any medication which will be injected during the procedure except the 1.5cc
of Midazolam IV that will be given for light sedation. Fluoroscopy will be used to identify
the specific site of the injections and radiofrequency in all cases. After sterile
preparation of the needle insertion area, the skin will be infiltrated with 1% Lidocaine,
and a 22-gauge, 4-in radiofrequency needle with a 10 mm curved active tip will be advanced
under fluoroscopic guidance. Anatomic landmarks will be identified, and the needle will be
positioned closely to the dorsal root ganglion under fluoroscopy guidance. The tip of the
needle will be placed in the dorsal-cranial quadrant of the intervertebral foramen on the
oblique image, and the tip will be positioned between one-third and halfway to the pedicle
column on the antero-posterior image. If intravenous uptake will be occurred, the needle
will be repositioned until intravenous uptake was absent and an epidural flow pattern was
achieved. If intra-arterial, intrathecal, or intradiscal flow will be identified, the
procedure was aborted. After confirmation of epidural spread (using a contrast dye) and the
radiofrequency needle positioning adjacent to the appropriate dorsal root ganglion, 1 cc of
normal saline will be injected to decrease electrical impedance around the radiofrequency
needle. Then the stylet will be replaced by the radiofrequency probe and the probe will be
connected to the radiofrequency generator. Defining the final position of the radiofrequency
probe will require a sensory stimulation (50 Hz) threshold ≤0.5 V, which will create
paresthesia corresponding to the existing distribution of the patient's radicular pain. Then
in the two groups of patients two cycles of pulsed radiofrequency will be performed at 42°C
for 120 seconds. Immediately after the radiofrequency treatment in the Celestone group the
solution of 1 cc of Lidocaine 1% with 1 cc of Celestone Chronodose will be injected around
each dorsal root ganglion through the radiofrequency needle. In the control group the
solution of 1 cc of Lidocaine 1% with 1 cc of normal saline will be injected.
All patients will be treated according to the protocol. If an emergency situation occurs or
in case of unblinding, the treatment will be altered and the patients will be considered
withdrawn. Such patients will proceed with conservative or interventional management without
unblinding. They will also continue their structured exercise program, as other patients do.
After the procedure the patient will be taken to the recovery room in the pain clinic and
will be monitored for at least for 30 minutes. Vital signs will be assessed immediately
post-op in the recovery room and again after 30 minutes, just prior to discharge.
Requests for additional analgesia (Optalgin, etc) will be assessed. During the 30 minutes
following the entry to recovery room the patients will be asked if they are experiencing any
of a number of the symptoms used by the list of adverse events and their responses will
noted in their records. All the patients will be warned of potentially serious complications
requiring immediate evaluation (e.g. progressive weakness). To examine delayed adverse
events the patients will be asked to select any of a number of the symptoms used by the list
of adverse events for up to 72 hours after the procedure (the patients will be asked to
bring the completed lists of the symptoms to their follow up visit in 1 month after a
procedure). All patients will be seen at a follow-up appointment with their pain treating
physician in the Pain Department of Tel HaShomer in 1, 2 and 3 months following the
procedure.
Results:
The baseline characteristics of all participating patients will be collected. Numerical data
will include age, height, weight, body mass index, total duration of pain. Categorical data
will include sex, diagnosis, coexisting medical conditions such as diabetes and
hypertension, target location, and level of the compromised nerve root(s).
A comprehensive review and statistical analysis of data will be conducted at the completion
of the study. Changes in pain scores, as reported by the patients via the NRS scores, will
be analyzed before the procedure and at 1, 2 and 3 months postprocedure. Changes in ADL and
QoL will be measured using the Roland Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry low back
pain disability scales. Both the Roland Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry scores
will be completed by the patients both before the procedure and at 1, 2 and 3 months
postprocedure.
Successful pain relief (responders) will be defined as either ≥50% or ≥4-point pain
reduction in the NRS; functional success will be defined as either ≥40% reduction in Roland
Disability Questionnaire or Oswestry Disability Index scores.
Data analyses will be carried out with the help of a package of statistical programs Win
Pepi (the fourth version). Categorical and continuous data comparison, Chi-squared test
(Fisher's exact test where necessary) and t test will be performed.
The outcome data of the patients will be measured at 4 periods of time therefore a repeated
measures analysis of variance will be performed. A P value of less than 0.05 will be
considered as statistically significant.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03916705 -
Thoraco-Lumbar Fascia Mobility
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04007302 -
Modification of the Activity of the Prefrontal Cortex by Virtual Distraction in the Lumbago
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03273114 -
Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03600207 -
The Effect of Diaphragm Muscle Training on Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04284982 -
Periodized Resistance Training for Persistent Non-specific Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05600543 -
Evaluation of the Effect of Lumbar Belt on Spinal Mobility in Subjects With and Without Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05410366 -
Safe Harbors in Emergency Medicine, Specific Aim 3
|
||
Completed |
NCT03673436 -
Effect of Lumbar Spinal Fusion Predicted by Physiotherapists
|
||
Completed |
NCT02546466 -
Effects of Functional Taping on Static Postural Control in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00983385 -
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05156242 -
Corticospinal and Motor Behavior Responses After Physical Therapy Intervention in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04673773 -
MY RELIEF- Evidence Based Information to Support People Aged 55+ Years Living and Working With Persistent Low-back Pain.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06049277 -
Mulligan Technique Versus McKenzie Extension Exercise Chronic Unilateral Radicular Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06049251 -
ELDOA Technique Versus Lumbar SNAGS With Motor Control Exercises
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04980469 -
A Study to Explore the Effect of Vitex Negundo and Zingiber Officinale on Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain Due to Sedentary Lifestyle
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04055545 -
High Intensity Interval Training VS Moderate Intensity Continuous Training in Chronic Low Back Pain Subjects
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05944354 -
Wearable Spine Health System for Military Readiness
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05552248 -
Assessment of the Safety and Performance of a Lumbar Belt
|
||
Completed |
NCT05801588 -
Participating in T'ai Chi to Reduce Back Pain and Improve Quality of Life
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05811143 -
Examining the Effects of Dorsal Column Stimulation on Pain From Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Related to Epidural Lipomatosis.
|