Bone Deficiency, Posterior Maxillae Clinical Trial
| NCT number | NCT02833337 |
| Other study ID # | 52/2012 |
| Secondary ID | |
| Status | Completed |
| Phase | |
| First received | |
| Last updated | |
| Start date | July 2016 |
| Est. completion date | September 2016 |
| Verified date | August 2020 |
| Source | Center of Implantology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Badajoz, Spain |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Observational |
Overcoming the vertical and horizontal bone deficiency in the posterior maxillae are
considered as the most challenging scenarios for implant-supported oral rehabilitation in
modern implant dentistry. Therefore, a comprehensive and precise understanding of such
anatomical structures are needed to avoid potential complications that ultimately might
jeopardize the treatment outcome.
Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) offers some advantages to conventional CT-scan such
as lower-dose radiation with high isotropic spatial resolution and cost. Therefore, it offers
a viable and reliable tool to study anatomical structures such as the posterior atrophic
maxillae
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 180 |
| Est. completion date | September 2016 |
| Est. primary completion date | September 2016 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 18 Years to 80 Years |
| Eligibility |
- Images were included if: 1. Pristine maxillary posterior atrophic ridges (between premolars and molars) as a result of missing single or multiple teeth for over than 12 months. 2. Residual ridge height (RH) was < 10 mm. 3. Presence of teeth adjacent to or opposing the edentulous area so the location of the edentulous ridges corresponding to the tooth site could be identified. 4. The maxillary sinus to be measured was visible from its floor to at least 15 mm from the alveolar crest of the edentulous ridge. - Images were excluded if: 1. Images were unclear or incomplete due to scattering or other reasons 2. Edentulous ridge height was more than 10 mm 3. Ridge preservation/augmentation simultaneous/delayed to tooth extractions 4. Grafted maxillary sinus for implant-supported prosthesis 5. The location of the edentulous ridge cannot be determined 6. Implants or other prosthetic device restoring the posterior ridge 7. Presence of sinus pathology that made the measurement impossible 8. The outline of the edentulous ridge cannot be identified due to low 'grey scale' density |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spain | Florencio Monje Gil | Badajoz |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Center of Implantology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Badajoz, Spain |
Spain,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Lateral Wall Thickness | Thickness measured in mm of the lateral aspect of the maxillary sinus | One month |