Incontinence Associated Dermatitis Clinical Trial
Official title:
Multi-Center, Randomized Trial Comparing the Efficacy of 3M™ Cavilon™ Advanced Barrier Film for the Treatment of Incontinence-associated Dermatitis to a Commercially Available Moisture Barrier
Verified date | October 2018 |
Source | 3M |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the investigational product (3M™ Cavilon™ Advanced High Endurance Skin Protectant) for the treatment of incontinence associated dermatitis.
Status | Terminated |
Enrollment | 45 |
Est. completion date | June 23, 2017 |
Est. primary completion date | June 23, 2017 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | N/A and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: Subjects may be enrolled into this study if the answers to all these questions are yes. 1. Is the subject a full-term newborn (36 weeks or greater gestational age) or older? 2. Is the subject in a facility providing nursing care 24 hours per day? 3. Does the subject have severe Category 2 Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis (IAD) -red with skin breakdown (i.e. skin erosion and denudation or denudation of skin alone)? 4. Is the subject willing to have photos taken of their skin exposed to incontinence and permit use of photographs in potential publication? 5. Is the subject willing to release rights to 3M for the use of the photos? 6. Is there a reasonable expectation that the subject will remain in a facility for at least 7 days following enrollment in the study? 7. Has the subject, or their legally authorized representative, signed an Institutional Review Board-approved informed consent/assent document and authorized the use and disclosure of protected health information? Exclusion Criteria: - Subjects are excluded from participation in this study if any of the answers to these following questions is yes. 1. If female, is the subject pregnant or breast feeding or has she given birth within the 3 weeks preceding the screening visit? 2. Does the subject have a known allergy to acrylates or cyanoacrylates? 3. Does the subject have a Stage III, IV, unstageable, suspected deep tissue injury pressure ulcer in the area where the skin is affected by incontinence? 4. Does the subject have a preexisting skin disease on the areas affected by incontinence that may make skin assessments for this study difficult? 5. Does the skin area affected by incontinence require treatment with a concomitant medication or product? 6. Does the subject have an active genital herpes infection? 7. Has the subject received antifungal powders in the area affected with IAD within 24 hours prior to enrollment? 8. Has the subject received cyanoacrylate based skin protectant (such as Marathon) within 72 hours prior to enrollment? 9. Is the facility unwilling to discontinue use for this subject of Dimethicone-containing wipes on the area where the skin protectant product will be applied? 10. Is the facility unwilling to discontinue use for this subject of Chlorhexidine Gluconate wipes on the area where the skin protectant product will be applied? 11. Does the subject have any medical condition that in the opinion of the investigator should exclude him/her from participating in the study? 12. Has the subject been enrolled in any investigational study where product was applied to proposed study sites within 30 days of the screening visit? |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Roper St. Francis | Charleston | South Carolina |
United States | Hackensack University Medical Center | Hackensack | New Jersey |
United States | Good Samaritan | Kearney | Nebraska |
United States | St. Elizabeth | Lincoln | Nebraska |
United States | North Shore University Hospital | Manhasset | New York |
United States | Children's Hospitals and Clinic | Minneapolis | Minnesota |
United States | Lennox Hill | New York | New York |
United States | Baylor Plano | Plano | Texas |
United States | Children's Hospital and Clinics | Saint Paul | Minnesota |
United States | St. John | Tulsa | Oklahoma |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
3M |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Percent Change From Baseline to End of Study in Incontinence Associated Dermatitis (IAD) Scores | Primary endpoint was percent decrease in Incontinence Associated Dermatitis (IAD) score from baseline to end of subject's participation. A negative value indicates increased IAD score; a positive value indicates decreased IAD score. IAD scores were calculated for 6 anatomical zones for color, presence of lesions, and skin loss using 3M's Skin Condition Assessment Tool. Skin condition assessed for 1) epidermal loss depth & area involved; 2) skin color intact skin & % area if not normal color. Intensity scored based on % area involved. Epidermal loss intensity rating scores ranged from 0 (none) - 4 (76-100%) partial (skin open, not weeping) or complete (skin open & weeping). Color of intact skin rating scores ranged from 0 (skin color normal) - 4 (76-100%) skin color pink or red. Scores for each of the 6 body zones were combined to obtain a single IAD score for each subject. IAD scores ranged from 0 (best) - 720 (worst). | up to 21 days depending on length of hospitalization | |
Secondary | Re-epithelialization to a Category 1 or Lower | Looking for healing of denuded skin to re-epithelialized skin. | Up to 21 days depending on length of hospitalization | |
Secondary | Pain Scores During Incontinence Management | Pain scores during incontinence management were measured on a 0-10 scale, and analyzed only for subjects from the intent-to-treat dataset who could report pain. Adult pain was measured on 0-10 Wong-Baker FACES® Pain Scale Visual Analog to see if there is pain reduction (0 - no pain; 10 - worst pain). Pain in pediatric patients was measured with the 0-10 FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Behavioral) Tool. FLACC tool scores pain based on 5 categories, each scored on 0-2 scale and a total score calculated from the sum of the 5 categories for a total possible 0 (no pain) - 10 (worst pain) score. Data from the 2 scales were combined for analysis. Reduction in pain scores collected during product application were reported and least squares means adjusted for baseline pain score as a covariate were calculated. Negative value indicates reduction in pain score; positive value indicates increased pain score. | Up to 21 days depending on length of hospitalization | |
Secondary | Prevention of IAD. | Number of subjects with areas of buttock and thighs that were free of IAD at baseline and remained free of damage with ongoing incontinence through 5 days of treatment. | Measured at study day 5 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT02080247 -
Treatment of Incontinence Associated Dermatitis in Older Children and Adults
|
Phase 3 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05471180 -
Adjuvant Effect of Photobiomodulation in the Treatment of Incontinence-associated Dermatitis in Adults
|
N/A |