Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02421874
Other study ID # 2R42MH095516
Secondary ID
Status Active, not recruiting
Phase Phase 1/Phase 2
First received April 10, 2015
Last updated October 24, 2016
Start date July 2015
Est. completion date January 2017

Study information

Verified date October 2016
Source University of Washington
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority United States: Institutional Review Board
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this Phase II Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) project is to complete development and evaluate usability and effectiveness of the Wraparound Team Monitoring System (Wrap-TMS), a web-based, electronic behavioral health information system (EBHIS) for the most widely implemented care coordination model in children's behavioral health, the wraparound process. Though wraparound is now considered "evidence-based," implementation in the real world often fails to conform to standards of fidelity and/or use objective data to guide management, supervision, and clinical decision making. Availability of such a system will support efficiency, implementation quality and fidelity, and outcomes for youths enrolled in wraparound. Wrap-TMS features functionality for data entry, management, and basic reporting for the full array of data and information elements needed to manage an integrated care coordination initiative for youths with serious emotional and behavioral disorder (SEBD). In light of our success in Phase I, subsequent partnerships with federal agencies, and inquiries of interest from several states and over 20 provider and managed care organizations, in this Phase II STTR the investigators will complete development of Wrap-TMS, followed by a randomized controlled effectiveness study comparing n=25 wraparound facilitators who use Wrap-TMS serving n=100 families to 25 non-user facilitators serving 100 families on practitioner, implementation, and youth/family outcomes. The evaluation will test two primary hypotheses:

1. Compared to facilitators in the control group, wraparound facilitators trained to use Wrap-TMS will demonstrate (a) greater use of data and feedback in service delivery; (b) greater fidelity to the wraparound process; (c) higher self-reported teamwork, working alliance, and satisfaction with the intervention; and (d) more positive attitudes toward standardized assessment.

2. Compared to the control group, parents of youths receiving services from facilitators trained to use TMS will report (a) greater goal clarity, (b) more data collection and use (c) greater satisfaction with services and progress, (d) better fidelity to wraparound, (e) more effective team functioning, (f) greater treatment alliance, and (f) better youth outcomes including greater progress and improved symptoms and functioning.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Active, not recruiting
Enrollment 160
Est. completion date January 2017
Est. primary completion date November 2016
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Parent or legal guardian of a youth aged 6-17 with SEBD (serious emotional and behavioral disorder): at least one MH (mental health) diagnosis that results in long-term (>6 mos) impairment in home, school and/or community functioning).

Exclusion Criteria:

- Non English speaking parents

- Foster parents

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Health Services Research


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Behavioral:
Wraparound Team Monitoring System electronic health record
Wraparound Team Monitoring System (Wrap-TMS) is a web-based, electronic behavioral health information system (EBHIS) for the most widely implemented care coordination model in children's behavioral health, the wraparound process
Education about fidelity maintenance and monitoring
As an active comparator, we will educate practitioners randomized to the control condition about the importance of maintaining fidelity and monitoring fidelity and progress via a 3 hour training.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States University of Washington Seattle Washington

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Washington

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary more effective teamwork (Team Climate Inventory (TCI) Team Climate Inventory (TCI). The TCI is a 38-item survey that evaluates five relevant aspects of health care teamwork (Shared Vision, Participation safety, Support for Innovation, Task orientation, Interaction frequency) using a 5 point Likert scale. Assessed at 4 mos. post enrollment 6 months No
Primary treatment alliance (Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) is a widely used rating scale designed to measure the working alliance between counselors and clients. Assessed at 4 mos. post enrollment 6 months No
Primary improved youth functioning (Top Problem Assessment (TPA) Top Problem Assessment (TPA) is a consumer-focused index the severity of the top three problems nominated by the parent, on a scale of 0-10. Assessed at BL, 1, 2, 3, 4 mos. 6 months No
Secondary parent and provider satisfaction (Parent and Child Satisfaction Scales) Parent and Child Satisfaction Scales reliably measure five dimensions of satisfaction, each with 1 Likert scale item, including: (1) access and convenience, (2) child's treatment process and relationship with providers, (3) parent and family services, satisfaction with progress, and (5) global satisfaction. Assessed at 4 mos post enrollment 3 months No
Secondary attitudes toward standardized assessment (Attitudes toward Standardized Assessment Scale (ASA)105) Attitudes toward Standardized Assessment Scale (ASA)105. A 22-item measure of clinician perceptions and attitudes about using standardized assessments in their clinical practice. Items are scored on a 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree) scale and yield 3 subscales with adequate or better reliabilities: Benefit over Clinical Judgment, Psychometric Quality, and Practicality. Administered to practitioners at baseline and 4 mos. 3 months No