Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02374944
Other study ID # REB14-0625
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date January 23, 2018
Est. completion date December 2025

Study information

Verified date November 2022
Source University of Calgary
Contact Karin Lienhard, PhD
Phone 403-944-2932
Email karin.lienhard@ucalgary.ca
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study is a multicenter prospective randomized control trial comparing hardware retention (HR) to removal of hardware (RH).


Description:

Eligible patients will be randomized to one of two treatment arms: Hardware removal at 6 months or Hardware retention for a minimum of 2 years. Consenting patients having previously undergone open reduction and internal fixation of Lisfranc injuries with an anatomic reconstruction within 6-8 weeks will be randomized to one of two treatment arms: removal hardware (RH) or hardware retention (HR). Outcome will be assessed at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years from enrollment.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 94
Est. completion date December 2025
Est. primary completion date December 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Subject has Lisfranc injury that was treated within 28 days of injury. - Subject must be enrolled in study between 6 and 8 weeks from time of initial fixation operation. - The patient must be medically fit for anesthesia - Subject is willing and able to provide written informed consent for trial participation - Subject is willing and able to comply with the study protocol including return for all follow-up evaluations - Subject may have a bony, ligamentous, or combined lisfranc injury - Demonstrated instability of the lisfranc complex on static, stress view or CT radiography. - Associated injuries - other than the lisfranc complex - are permitted provided those injuries are not deemed to significantly influence the rehabilitation or recovery of the patient at the discretion of the enrolling surgeon - Adequate reduction to within 1mm of lisfranc complex at time of fixation - Hardware across the midfoot (tarsal-metatarsal joints 1-3) Exclusion Criteria: - Subject has a significant pre-existing foot injury - Subject has a delay in initial treatment greater than 28 days from time of injury - Subject has an active infection in the area of surgical approach requiring surgical debridement - Subject has concomitant injury which, in the opinion of the attending surgeon, is likely to impair rehabilitation or prolong fracture healing time (another long bone fracture, ipsilateral limb injury) - Subject has a history of rheumatoid arthritis, Diabetes, fibrous dysplasia, chronic renal failure, Paget's disease, or osteopetrosis or any other pre-existing pathologic condition affecting the Lisfranc complex - Subject has a high risk of death from surgery (ASA physical status Class V) - Subject is likely unable to maintain follow-up(no fixed address, plans to move out of town in the next year, states unable to comply with protocol, etc.) - Subject has cognitive impairment or language difficulties that would impede the valid completion of questionnaires - Subject is pregnant - There has been loss of fixation or reduction prior to enrollment - Previous corrective foot surgery - Associated fracture of calcaneus, talus, or tibial plafond. - Pathologic fracture - Loss of fixation or reduction prior to enrollment

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Hardware removal
Comparison of implant retention vs. scheduled implant removal in skeletally mature patients with previously operatively treated Lisfranc injuries requiring screw and/or plate fixation.

Locations

Country Name City State
Canada Foothills Medical Centre Calgary Alberta
Canada Peter Lougheed Centre Calgary Alberta
Canada South Health Campus Calgary Alberta

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Calgary Calgary Orthopaedic Research and Education Fund, Memorial University of Newfoundland

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary AOFAS - American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Midfoot Score Subjective and objective evaluation of the midfoot with breakdown by function (45 points), pain (40 points), and alignment (15 points) with a yield anywhere between 0 and 100 points where 100 points is a perfect score. 6 weeks
Primary AOFAS - American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Midfoot Score Subjective and objective evaluation of the midfoot with breakdown by function (45 points), pain (40 points), and alignment (15 points) with a yield anywhere between 0 and 100 points where 100 points is a perfect score. 12 weeks
Primary AOFAS - American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Midfoot Score Subjective and objective evaluation of the midfoot with breakdown by function (45 points), pain (40 points), and alignment (15 points) with a yield anywhere between 0 and 100 points where 100 points is a perfect score. 6 months
Primary AOFAS - American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Midfoot Score Subjective and objective evaluation of the midfoot with breakdown by function (45 points), pain (40 points), and alignment (15 points) with a yield anywhere between 0 and 100 points where 100 points is a perfect score. 1 year
Primary AOFAS - American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Midfoot Score Subjective and objective evaluation of the midfoot with breakdown by function (45 points), pain (40 points), and alignment (15 points) with a yield anywhere between 0 and 100 points where 100 points is a perfect score. 2 years
Primary VAS-FA - Visual Analog Scale Foot and Ankle Patient reported responses on 20 subjective questions (Pain - 4; functional deficits -13; other complaints - 3) equally weighted. Possible score out of 100. 6 weeks
Primary VAS-FA - Visual Analog Scale Foot and Ankle Patient reported responses on 20 subjective questions (Pain - 4; functional deficits -13; other complaints - 3) equally weighted. Possible score out of 100. 12 weeks
Primary VAS-FA - Visual Analog Scale Foot and Ankle Patient reported responses on 20 subjective questions (Pain - 4; functional deficits -13; other complaints - 3) equally weighted. Possible score out of 100. 6 months
Primary VAS-FA - Visual Analog Scale Foot and Ankle Patient reported responses on 20 subjective questions (Pain - 4; functional deficits -13; other complaints - 3) equally weighted. Possible score out of 100. 1 year
Primary VAS-FA - Visual Analog Scale Foot and Ankle Patient reported responses on 20 subjective questions (Pain - 4; functional deficits -13; other complaints - 3) equally weighted. Possible score out of 100. 2 years
Primary SF-36 Patient reported measure on physical and mental status on 36 items across eight health domains. 6 weeks
Primary SF-36 Patient reported measure on physical and mental status on 36 items across eight health domains. 12 weeks
Primary SF-36 Patient reported measure on physical and mental status on 36 items across eight health domains. 6 months
Primary SF-36 Patient reported measure on physical and mental status on 36 items across eight health domains. 1 year
Primary SF-36 Patient reported measure on physical and mental status on 36 items across eight health domains. 2 years
Primary VAS - Visual Analogue Scale (Patient Satisfaction) Single visual analogue scale to evaluate patient satisfaction on a scale of 0 to 100. 6 weeks
Primary VAS - Visual Analogue Scale (Patient Satisfaction) Single visual analogue scale to evaluate patient satisfaction on a scale of 0 to 100. 12 weeks
Primary VAS - Visual Analogue Scale (Patient Satisfaction) Single visual analogue scale to evaluate patient satisfaction on a scale of 0 to 100. 6 months
Primary VAS - Visual Analogue Scale (Patient Satisfaction) Single visual analogue scale to evaluate patient satisfaction on a scale of 0 to 100. 1 year
Primary VAS - Visual Analogue Scale (Patient Satisfaction) Single visual analogue scale to evaluate patient satisfaction on a scale of 0 to 100. 2 years
Secondary Radiologic outcome Radiographic measurement of the gap between 1st and 2nd metatarsals and maintenance of reduction on static and weight bearing xrays from index films at enrollment to 2 years. 2 years
Secondary Cost-effectiveness Cost of treatment and complications plus incremental costs up to 2 year follow up will be collected and compared with Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) 2 years