Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Clinical Trial
Official title:
Diagnostic Accuracy of Gallium-68-DOTATATE PET/CT Compared to Indium-111-pentetreotide Scintigraphy (SPECT/CT) for Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
The investigators hypothesize that the new imaging method Gallium-68-DOTATATE has a higher diagnostic value in the detection of neuroendocrine tumors than the established imaging method Indium-111-Octreoscan. Therefore, the investigators will perform both imaging procedures in patients with suspected or confirmed neuroendocrine tumors. Subsequently, the investigators will compare the diagnostic performance of both methods.
Background
Neuroendocrine tumors Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are heterogeneous slow-growing neoplasms,
occurring in 1-4/100,000 people per year. They origin from endocrine cells that derive from
entodermal stem cells and are characterized by an endocrine metabolism and a typical
pathologic pattern.
Slow metabolic rates of NET, small lesion size and variable anatomical localization have
represented the major limits for lesions diagnosis. The diagnostic workup for NET has relied
on conventional morphological imaging procedures including computed tomography (CT),
ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with gamma camera functional
imaging, namely whole-body somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS). SRS show a higher
diagnostic accuracy than CT for NET diagnosis at both the primary and metastatic site, but
there is still room for improvement. Novel PET tracers specifically developed for NET may
increase diagnostic accuracy considerably as outlined below.
Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) As NET have high affinity somatostatin receptors,
scintigraphic methods have been developed in the early nineties to allow in vivo imaging.
SRS using Indium-111-DTPA-octreotide (Indium-111-pentetreotide scintigraphy), is the most
widely used diagnostic test. Although rather sensitive and helpful for whole body staging
compared to traditional imaging methods, this technique has pitfalls, one of them being the
poor spatial resolution, leading to the development of PET-based imaging.
Gallium-68-DOTA-peptide PET In the past decade, several positron emitting tracers have been
developed for NET imaging. 68Ga-DOTA-peptides are a group of PET tracers that specifically
bind to somatostatin receptors (SSTR) over-expressed on NET cells. Gallium-68-DOTA-peptides
structure can be summarized in (1) the active part binding to SSTR (TOC, NOC, TATE), (2) the
chelant (DOTA) and (3) the isotope (68Ga). Indications to perform 68Ga -DOTA-peptides
studies in NET patients include: staging, re-staging after therapy, identification of the
site of the unknown primary tumor in patients with proven NET secondary lesions and
selection of cases eligible for therapy with somatostatin analogues.
68Ga-DOTA-TOC was the first tracer to be employed in NET imaging and was reported to present
a high tumor to non-tumor contrast and a higher sensitivity compared to SRS . The study with
the largest patients population (84 pts with NET), reported sensitivity (97%) for DOTA-TOC
PET to be superior to CT (61%) and SRS (52%) for the detection of NET lesions, especially in
case of small tumors at nodal or bone level. In a comparison study of 51 patients with well
differentiated NET, PET with Gallium-DOTA-TOC performed better than CT and SRS for the early
detection of bone NET secondary lesions (sensitivity of 97%, specificity of 92%).
68Ga-DOTA-TATE is characterized by a very high affinity for SSTR2 with a considerably higher
affinity than 111In-DTPA octreotide. In a recent study, 51 patients with established NET (35
negative and 16 equivocal for uptake on SRS) were examined by 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET.
68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET identified significantly more lesions than SRS and changed management in
36 patients (70.6%), who were subsequently deemed suitable for peptide receptor-targeted
therapy.
Rationale of the study 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy is the current standard for the
detection of NET, even though its diagnostic accuracy is less than optimal. In the past
decade, several 68Ga-DOTA-peptides have been developed for NET imaging, which showed a
better detection for NET than 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy in a small number of studies.
These studies had several limitations, most importantly the inclusion of rather small and
heterogeneous patient populations.
The aim of this study is to prospectively compare the diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-DOTA-TATE
PET/CT with 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy in a well-defined population of consecutive
patients with established GEP-NET or patients with suspicion of NET with indication for a
scintigraphy.
Objective
The objective of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of Gallium-68-DOTATATE
PET/CT with Indium-111-pentetreotide scintigraphy (SPECT/CT) for the diagnosis of
gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) in consecutive patients with
established GEP-NET or patients with suspicion of NET with indication for a scintigraphy.
The working hypothesis is that Gallium-68-DOTATATE PET/CT is superior to
Indium-111-pentetreotide scintigraphy (SPECT/CT) in terms of sensitivity and specificity.
Methods
The present study is a multi-center assessor-blind diagnostic case-control study of
Gallium-68-DOTATATE PET/CT compared to Indium-111-pentetreotide scintigraphy (SPECT/CT) in
consecutive patients with established GEP-NET or patients with suspicion of NET with
indication for a scintigraphy.
The study is conducted at the University Hospital Basel, Bern University Hospital, and CHUV
Lausanne. The University Clinics of Nuclear Medicine of Basel, Bern and Lausanne, as well as
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition of Bern will accrue consecutive patients with
established GEP-NET or patients with suspicion of GEP-NET that meet eligibility criteria.
All patients will undergo Gallium-68-DOTATATE PET/CT as index test and
Indium-111-pentetreotide scintigraphy as standard test. Both results will be compared with
histology and the follow-up results as diagnostic gold standards.
;
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT02231762 -
Combination of Lanreotide Autogel 120mg and Temozolomide in Progressive GEP-NET
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02730104 -
Community-based Neuroendocrine Tumor (NET) Research Study
|
||
Completed |
NCT02608203 -
[68 Ga]-DOTANOC PET/CT in GEP-NETs
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01842165 -
177Lutetium-octreotate Treatment Prediction Using Multimodality Imaging in Refractory NETs
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02630654 -
Study For Evaluating The Value Of A Multi Biomarker Approach In Metastatic GEP NETs
|
||
Completed |
NCT02162446 -
68Ga-OPS202 Study for Diagnostic Imaging of GEP NET
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03043664 -
Study of Pembrolizumab With Lanreotide Depot for Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04524442 -
Post-Authorization Safety Study (PASS) of LysaKare® in Adult Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor (GEP-NET) Patients
|
Phase 4 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04711135 -
Study to Evaluate Safety and Dosimetry of Lutathera in Adolescent Patients With GEP-NETs and PPGLs
|
Phase 2 |