Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01983293
Other study ID # 60037834
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date November 2013
Est. completion date January 2018

Study information

Verified date February 2019
Source Abbott Medical Devices
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of left ventricular lead pacing location in the non-left bundle branch block (non-LBBB) heart failure patient population. The left ventricular lead pacing location will be guided by either the pacing site with the largest amount of dyssynchrony as measured by the LV electrical delay (QLV) or the physician's standard of care implant approach.


Description:

This is a prospective, pilot, multi-center, double-blinded, randomized post-market study to assess the effect of left ventricular lead pacing location (guided via QLV measurement vs. standard of care approach) in non-LBBB patients.

In the QLV arm the physician will:

1. Assess two branches of the coronary sinus - a non-traditional vessel (inclusive of the anterior region) will be tested first and a traditional free lateral branch will be tested second for LV lead placement.

2. Measure QLV for each of the four cathodes of the left ventricular lead in each branch.

3. Choose the vein branch and cathode with the longest QLV measurement and program a vector based on that cathode.

In the standard of care group, the left ventricular lead placement will be carried out according to the physician's standard of care implant approach.

The impact of the left ventricular lead position will be evaluated based on the patient's response to CRT utilizing the Clinical Composite Score (cardiovascular death, heart failure hospitalizations, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, and Patient Global Assessment). Authorized site personnel conducting the NYHA class assessment and Patient Global Assessment will be blinded to the randomization assignment and lead implant technique.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 248
Est. completion date January 2018
Est. primary completion date January 2018
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Have non-LBBB morphology (includes complete right bundle branch block and intraventricular conduction delay with a QRS duration = 120ms)

- Have the following indication per the 2013 updated American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/Heart Rhythm Society guidelines:

- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) = 35%, sinus rhythm, ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, a non-LBBB pattern with QRS duration = 120 ms, and NYHA) class III/ambulatory class IV on guideline directed medical therapy

- Receiving a new CRT implant or undergoing an upgrade from an existing implantable cardioverter defibrillator or pacemaker implant with no more than 10% right ventricular pacing

- Are 18 years or older, or of legal age to give informed consent specific to state and local law

- Ability to provide informed consent for study participation and is willing and able to comply with the prescribed follow-up tests and schedule of evaluations

Exclusion Criteria:

- Irreversible occlusion of venous access that will prevent placement of the CRT system either through the right or left upper extremity venous system

- Undergoing left ventricular lead placement via a surgical or epicardial approach

- Cardiomyopathy due solely to valvular disease that is not repaired/replaced

- Enrolled or intend to participate in a clinical drug and/or device study, which could confound the results of this trial as determined by St. Jude Medical, during the course of this clinical study

- LBBB: QRS width = 120 ms, with predominantly negative QRS in lead V1, and upright, monophasic QRS in leads I and V6

- Incomplete right bundle branch block - intraventricular conduction delay with a QRS duration between 110 and 119ms

- Persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation

- Pacemaker dependent

- Patients who are being upgraded primarily due to right ventricular pacing

- Women who are pregnant or who plan to become pregnant during the clinical trial

- Life expectancy < 1 year

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
QLV based implant strategy

Standard of care implant strategy


Locations

Country Name City State
United States Emory University Hospital Atlanta Georgia
United States Piedmont Heart Institute Atlanta Georgia
United States Johns Hopkins University Hospital Baltimore Maryland
United States Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts
United States Tufts Medical Center Boston Massachusetts
United States The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio
United States Henry Ford Hospital Detroit Michigan
United States St. John Hospital and Medical Center Detroit Michigan
United States Inova Fairfax Hospital Falls Church Virginia
United States Sutherland Cardiology Clinic Germantown Tennessee
United States Glendale Adventist Medical Center Glendale California
United States Baker-Gilmour Cardiovascular Institute Jacksonville Florida
United States Cardiovascular Associates, PC Kingsport Tennessee
United States Central Baptist Hospital Lexington Kentucky
United States University of Kentucky Lexington Kentucky
United States Bryan LGH Heart Institute Lincoln Nebraska
United States USC University Hospital Los Angeles California
United States Lynchburg General Hospital Lynchburg Virginia
United States Northshore University Hospital Manhasset New York
United States Baptist Memorial Hospital Memphis Tennessee
United States Cardiovascular Associates of Virginia Midlothian Virginia
United States Mission Hospital Mission Viejo California
United States McLaren Macomb Mount Clemens Michigan
United States Oschner Medical Center New Orleans Louisiana
United States Baylor Regional Center at Plano Plano Texas
United States Atlanta Heart Associates - Riverdale Riverdale Georgia
United States University of Rochester Medical Center Rochester New York
United States United Hospital Saint Paul Minnesota
United States Northside Hospital Saint Petersburg Florida
United States St. Joseph's Medical Center Stockton California
United States Stony Brook University Medical Center Stony Brook New York
United States North Mississippi Medical Center Tupelo Mississippi

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Abbott Medical Devices

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (1)

Singh JP, Berger RD, Doshi RN, Lloyd M, Moore D, Daoud EG; ENHANCE CRT Study Group. Rationale and design for ENHANCE CRT: QLV implant strategy for non-left bundle branch block patients. ESC Heart Fail. 2018 Dec;5(6):1184-1190. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12340. Epub 2018 Sep 27. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Number of Patients With Improved Clinical Composite Score Evaluate the Clinical Composite Score (CCS) at 12 months in NLBBB patients using a standard of care vs. latest electrical delay (QLV) implant strategy. The CCS has 4 components: New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification, Patient Global Assessment (PGA), heart failure (HF) events, cardiovascular death. NYHA Class ranges from Class I (least severe) to Class IV (most severe); possible PGA responses are "markedly worse", "moderately worse", "slightly worse", "no change", "slightly better", "moderately better, "markedly better". CCS components were used to classify or score subjects as "IMPROVED" (at least one-class improvement in NYHA Class or improvement by PGA "moderately" or "markedly" better AND no HF events AND no cardiovascular death), or "WORSENED" (worsening in NYHA Class OR worsening by PGA "moderately" or "markedly" worse OR presence of HF events OR Cardiovascular death, or "UNCHANGED" (neither "improved" or "worsened"). Note CCS is not a numeric score. 12 months