Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01884480
Other study ID # FK17
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received June 19, 2013
Last updated November 18, 2014
Start date June 2013
Est. completion date September 2014

Study information

Verified date November 2014
Source St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Canada: Ethics Review Committee
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

In Kidney transplant recipients Once daily Tacrolimus has the poteb]ntial advantage of better adnerence, and perhpas improvement in reanl function compred with the twice daily tacrolimus formulation.

Our center has the largest experience in North America with once-daily tacrolimus ( advagraf) in Renal transplant recipients.

Recently we converted ~500 stable patients from the twice daily to once-daily tacrolimus.

We are interested in:

1. change in renal function

2. dose changes based on ethnic diveristy

3. dose changes based on pharmacogenetics

This will helpnus understand better ways to utilize this anti-rejection medication


Description:

The Renal transplant program at St. Michael's is one of the largest in Canada. The CNI of choice since 2000 has been tacrolimus based therapy. In 2009 our program decided to switch from bid prograf to once daily advagraf for all de-novo renal transplant recipients (RTR). Our Advagraf experience is currently the largest in North America. Because of concerns regarding generic prograf, we began a conversion of > 600 prevalent transplant patients on bid prograf to OD advagraf in January 2012. At present this is nearly completed.

It has been recognized that dosing of tacrolimus is highly dependent on pharmacogenentic differences related to the CYP3A5 genotype. CYP3A%*3 (nonexpressors) require significantly higher doses of tacrolimus than CYP3A5*1 (expressers) with heterozygotes being somewhere in the middle. Our study will examine the demographics, renal function and tacrolimus dosing and Co levels, both pre and post conversion from tac BID, to tac OD in our cohort of converted patients.

Of More scientific interest, will be to retrospectively determine the CYP3A5 genotypes in recipients who required significant dose adjustments in the tac OD following conversion and compare to a matched cohort of recipients in whom no dose adjustment was needed.

The hypothesis is that recipients who require dose increase when converted from the BID to the OD formulation, will have a different CYP3A5 genotype and will tend towards CYP3A5*3.

This will be the largest cohort to look at this question. Specifically this may lead to better dosing of tac OD, if pre-emptive genotyping prior to transplantation were to be employed.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 60
Est. completion date September 2014
Est. primary completion date September 2014
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years to 95 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: Renal transplamnt recipients on prograf converted to advagraf

Exclusion Criteria:

Study Design

Observational Model: Cohort, Time Perspective: Retrospective


Related Conditions & MeSH terms

  • Examin Ethnicity and Pharmacogenetics of the Cohort Requiring Dose Adjustment Post-conversion
  • Real Function Post Conversion From Prograf to Advagraf

Locations

Country Name City State
Canada St.Michael's Hospital Toronto Ontario

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Difference in Cyp3a5 genotype in recipients requiring dose adjustment in converion from prograf to advagraf 12 months Yes
Secondary change in renal function after conversion from prograf to advagraf 6 months No