Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01868789
Other study ID # OH1-12-00397
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received May 24, 2013
Last updated January 31, 2018
Start date May 2013
Est. completion date November 2013

Study information

Verified date January 2018
Source Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Center, Ohio
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the average joint motion and joint axis orientation of the hindfoot bones between patients diagnosed with adult-acquired flatfoot disorder (AAFD) and a control group of patients without foot deformity, using weight-bearing CT technology.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 23
Est. completion date November 2013
Est. primary completion date November 2013
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 80 Years
Eligibility Symptomatic group:

Inclusion Criteria:

1. adult patients (ages 18 -80 years old) diagnosed with Stage 2 AAFD

Exclusion Criteria:

1. previous surgery

2. infection

3. tumor in the affected foot

4. pregnancy

Control group:

Inclusion Criteria:

1. adult patients (ages 18 -80 years old) without foot deformity

Exclusion Criteria:

1. history of previous foot and ankle surgery

2. foot deformity

3. known foot and ankle pathology

4. pregnancy

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms

  • Adult-acquired Flatfoot Disorder (AAFD)
  • Flatfoot

Intervention

Radiation:
Weightbearing CT


Locations

Country Name City State
United States Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Center Westerville Ohio

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Center, Ohio CurveBeam LLC

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change in Joint Motion Between Touch-down Bearing Navicular and Full-weight Bearing Navicular Relative motion, which is the position of the full weightbearing (FWB, greater that 75-100% body weight) navicular in comparison to the touch down weightbearing (TDWB, 25-50% body weight) navicular position, will be determined by comparing the joint orientation across these two points on one CT scan. The difference between the two positions is reported below. 1 CT scan, one reading while touch-down bearing, one reading while full-weight bearing
Primary Change in Navicular Rotation Between Touch-down Bearing and Full-weight Bearing Relative motion across joint segments will be determined by comparing the joint orientation across two time points: touch-down bearing (TDWB, 25-50% body weight) and full-weight bearing (FWB, greater that 75-100% body weight) as measured on CT. 1 CT scan, one reading while touch-down bearing, one reading while full-weight bearing