Spatial Neglect After Right Brain-damage Clinical Trial
— GVSOfficial title:
Therapeutic Effects of Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation (GVS) on Spatial Neglect
The purpose of this study is to determine whether galvanic vestibular stimulation is effective in the treatment of spatial neglect after right brain-damage.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 45 |
Est. completion date | March 2014 |
Est. primary completion date | January 2014 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - spatial neglect after unilateral ischemic infarction or unilateral haemorrhage Exclusion Criteria: - Chronic epilepsy - Metallic implants (including pacemakers) - Brain tumors - Scalp inflammation - Degenerative disease |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Germany | Schoen Clinic Bad Aibling | Bad Aibling | Bavaria |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Schoen Clinic Bad Aibling | German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders (IFB) |
Germany,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Change in subjective visual vertical due to intervention | The visual vertical is assessed with the bucket test, in which subjects are asked to indicate when a visual line is vertical for them. Deviations (in degrees) are measured. | Baseline, Post (day after last intervention session), Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after post testing), Follow-up 2 (4 after post testing) | No |
Primary | Change in Neglect Test (NET)due to intervention, the German version of the Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT) | Baseline, Post (day after last intervention session), Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after post testing), Follow-up 2 (4 after post testing) | No | |
Secondary | Change in visual-tactile search task due to intervention | Subjects searches objects glued to a board, the time needed to do so is measured | Baseline, Post (day after last intervention session), Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after post testing), Follow-up 2 (4 after post testing) | No |
Secondary | Change in subjective haptic vertical due to intervention | The haptic vertical is assessed with a wooden device, where subjects are asked to adjust a rod into a vertical position. Deviations (in degrees) are measured. | Baseline, Post (day after last intervention session), Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after post testing), Follow-up 2 (4 after post testing) | No |