Recovery Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Clinical Trial
Official title:
Independent Exercise Compared With Formal Rehabilitation Following Primary Total Knee Replacement
| NCT number | NCT01826305 |
| Other study ID # | 12-09642 |
| Secondary ID | |
| Status | Terminated |
| Phase | N/A |
| First received | |
| Last updated | |
| Start date | July 2014 |
| Est. completion date | October 23, 2015 |
| Verified date | January 2020 |
| Source | University of California, San Francisco |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
In this study we plan to compare the efficacy of independent exercises performed by the
patients at home to formal rehabilitation therapy following primary total knee replacement.
Patients will be randomized to these two cohorts at enrollment into the study and followed
prospectively. Patients randomized to the formal rehabilitation cohort will receive a
prescription for therapy for twelve weeks. Patients randomized to the independent exercise
cohort will receive online access to a twelve-week protocol of exercises to perform at home
to strengthen and improve function of the replaced joint.
At enrollment, a baseline evaluation will be conducted to capture demographics, height,
weight, primary diagnosis, medical comorbidities, and social supports as well as completion
of the selected outcome measure, American Knee Society (AKS) Score, Knee and Osteoarthritis
Outcome Score (KOOS). Secondary outcomes will include the measurement of health status with
use of the Short Form-12v2 (SF-12v2) and activity level with the University of California,
Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Score. At the twelve-week, six-month and twelve-month follow-up
visits, the study subjects will complete the KOOS, SF-12v2, and UCLA Activity Score
questionnaires. Statistical analysis will be performed to compare the outcomes between the
two cohorts.
Hypothesis:
There will be no difference in outcomes between formal rehabilitation and independent
exercises at twelve months after primary total knee replacement surgery using the American
Knee Society (AKS) Knee Score.
| Status | Terminated |
| Enrollment | 23 |
| Est. completion date | October 23, 2015 |
| Est. primary completion date | October 23, 2015 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 18 Years and older |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - scheduled for primary total knee arthroplasty - an age of eighteen years or older - English speaking - have a computer with access to the Internet Exclusion Criteria: - any knee arthroplasty other than total knee - patients not planning to return for follow up care - patients relying on others for basic functioning - do not speak English - do not have a computer with access to the Internet - prior physical therapy |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | University of California, San Francisco | San Francisco | California |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| University of California, San Francisco |
United States,
Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988 Dec;15(12):1833-40. — View Citation
Collins NJ, Misra D, Felson DT, Crossley KM, Roos EM. Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Activity Rating Scale (ARS), and Tegner Activity Score (TAS). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S208-28. doi: 10.1002/acr.20632. Review. — View Citation
Dorr LD, Maheshwari AV, Long WT, Wan Z, Sirianni LE. Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jun;89(6):1153-60. — View Citation
Hurst NP, Ruta DA, Kind P. Comparison of the MOS short form-12 (SF12) health status questionnaire with the SF36 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol. 1998 Aug;37(8):862-9. — View Citation
Khan F, Ng L, Gonzalez S, Hale T, Turner-Stokes L. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation programmes following joint replacement at the hip and knee in chronic arthropathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16;(2):CD004957. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004957.pub3. Review. — View Citation
Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5. — View Citation
Mahomed NN, Davis AM, Hawker G, Badley E, Davey JR, Syed KA, Coyte PC, Gandhi R, Wright JG. Inpatient compared with home-based rehabilitation following primary unilateral total hip or knee replacement: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Aug;90(8):1673-80. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01108. — View Citation
Mahomed NN, Koo Seen Lin MJ, Levesque J, Lan S, Bogoch ER. Determinants and outcomes of inpatient versus home based rehabilitation following elective hip and knee replacement. J Rheumatol. 2000 Jul;27(7):1753-8. — View Citation
Munin MC, Rudy TE, Glynn NW, Crossett LS, Rubash HE. Early inpatient rehabilitation after elective hip and knee arthroplasty. JAMA. 1998 Mar 18;279(11):847-52. — View Citation
Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS, Klässbo M, Roos EM. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)--validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003 May 30;4:10. Epub 2003 May 30. — View Citation
Nilsdotter AK, Toksvig-Larsen S, Roos EM. A 5 year prospective study of patient-relevant outcomes after total knee replacement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009 May;17(5):601-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2008.11.007. Epub 2008 Nov 21. — View Citation
Roos EM, Toksvig-Larsen S. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 May 25;1:17. — View Citation
Shepperd S, Harwood D, Jenkinson C, Gray A, Vessey M, Morgan P. Randomised controlled trial comparing hospital at home care with inpatient hospital care. I: three month follow up of health outcomes. BMJ. 1998 Jun 13;316(7147):1786-91. — View Citation
Shepperd S, Iliffe S. Hospital at home versus in-patient hospital care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;(3):CD000356. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(1):CD000356. — View Citation
Terwee CB, Bouwmeester W, van Elsland SL, de Vet HC, Dekker J. Instruments to assess physical activity in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a systematic review of measurement properties. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 Jun;19(6):620-33. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.01.002. Epub 2011 Jan 18. Review. — View Citation
* Note: There are 15 references in all — Click here to view all references
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Knee Function | The American Knee Society Score (AKS) consists of two parts. The first is the Knee Score, which considers pain, stability and range of motion as the main parameters, with deductions for flexion contractures, extension lag and malalignment. The second part, the Function Score, utilizes walking distance and stair climbing as the main parameters with deductions for the use of a walking aid. | up to 12 months post-operatively | |
| Secondary | General physical and mental health | The Short Form 12v2 (SF-12v2) is an abbreviated version of the Short Form-36 (SF-36) that includes the physical and emotional limitations that are placed on work and social activities. The SF-12v2 measures how individuals value their current health state. It has been shown to be reliable (Pearson r > 0.70), valid (highly correlated with SF-36), and responsive for the measurements of health status in many patient populations. | up to 12 months post-operatively | |
| Secondary | Activity Level | The UCLA Activity Score assesses an individual's level of activity. The evaluation has ten descriptive activity levels ranging from wholly inactive and dependent on others (level 1), to moderate activities such as unlimited housework and shopping (level 6), to regular participation in impact sports such as jogging or tennis (level 10). The individual is asked to pick the statement that best describes their activity level. | up to 12 months post-operatively | |
| Secondary | Knee and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) | The KOOS is a self-administered 40-item questionnaire used to assess patient-relevant outcomes in five separate subscales related to the knee (pain, symptoms, activity of daily living, sport and recreation function and knee related quality of life). The KOOS contains all Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questions in unchanged form, so a WOMAC score can be calculated from the KOOS. The WOMAC is used to assess pain, function, and stiffness of the knee. | up to 12 months post-operatively |