Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD) Clinical Trial
— SAD3Official title:
Transcranial Bright Light Therapy in Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD)- a Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial
Verified date | June 2013 |
Source | University of Oulu |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | Finland: Ethics Committee |
Study type | Interventional |
Bright light therapy (BLT) has been found to be effective in treatment of seasonal affective disorder (SAD). The mechanism of action of conventional BLT in the treatment of SAD is under debate. Recently, transcranial bright light (TBL) via ear canals has been proved to modulate the neural networks of the human brain and improve cognitive performance in healthy subjects. Moreover, TBL has been found to alleviate symptoms of SAD in open trial. In this case the investigators will study the effect of transcranial bright light treatment via ear canals on depressive and anxiety symptoms in patients suffering from SAD in randomized controlled double-blind study design.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 60 |
Est. completion date | March 2013 |
Est. primary completion date | March 2013 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - patient has (according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, text revision [DSM-IV-TR]) a Major depression, recurrent episode, seasonal pattern - Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale - Seasonal Affective Disorder Version Self Rating Version (SIGH-SAD-SR) score = 16 - patient is over 18 years and under 66 years - patient can read and understand the subject information sheet - patient has signed the informed consent form - patient is not pregnant Exclusion Criteria: - patient has a lifetime psychotic disorder - patient has a bipolar disorder - patient has alcohol or some other substance use dependence or misuse - patient has some unstable somatic disorder - patient uses some psychotropic agencies - patient is, in the opinion of the investigator, unsuitable for any reason - patient is a member of the site personnel or their immediate families - patient has administered bright light therapy via ear canals during the current episode |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Finland | Oulu University | Oulu |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Oulu |
Finland,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale - Seasonal Affective Disorder Version Self Rating Version, total score =9 | Remission, i.e., Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale - Seasonal Affective Disorder Version Self Rating Version total score = 9 | At the end of the four week study period | No |
Secondary | Beck Depression Inventory-II, total score <=10 | Remission, i.e.,Beck Depression Inventory-II, total score <=10 | At the end of the four week study period | No |
Secondary | State Trait Anxiety Inventory -Y2, total score | At the end of the four week study period | No | |
Secondary | Trail- making test (TMT-A and TMT-B),total time | At the end of the four weeks study period | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT00046449 -
Prevention of Seasonal Affective Disorder
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01714050 -
Cognitive-behavioral Therapy vs. Light Therapy for Preventing SAD Recurrence
|
N/A |