Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01765348
Other study ID # HKU 753610H
Secondary ID HKU 753610H
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received December 23, 2012
Last updated January 8, 2013
Start date March 2012
Est. completion date December 2012

Study information

Verified date January 2013
Source The University of Hong Kong
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority The University of Hong Kong: Institutional Review Board
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Specific-language-impairment (SLI) is defined as a significant disorder in language development, which affects one's daily functioning, but not attributable to sensory, intellectual or neuropsychological deficit. Children with SLI make up one of the largest subgroups of students with special educational needs (SEN) in Hong Kong. Without appropriate intervention, SLI may persist into adolescence and lead to long-term literacy difficulties and social rejection, which were found to be associated with societal problems like unemployment and crime commitment. Among the language domains, syntax/grammar has been viewed as a core deficit in these children. Speech-Language-Pathologists (SLPs) often provide intervention on this aspect for them. However, very few intervention efficacy studies could be identified.

Without pertinent research evidence, clinical-decision-making in treatment approach selection may be dubious. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of two procedures for syntax intervention, namely the Sentence-Combining (SC) and Narrative-Based (NAR) procedures using a randomized-controlled-trial (RCT) design. These two procedures have been indicated to be effective in previous case reports and expert opinions. By using the rigorous study design of RCT, this study provides stronger evidence to support clinicians in determining the most effective treatment procedure. To achieve sufficient statistical power to detect the treatment difference, 52 children with SLI will be recruited and randomly assigned to one of the treatment groups. The primary outcome will be measured by a standardized language assessment. Intention-to-treat analysis will be employed. Pre- and post-treatment scores on the outcomes will be subject to analyses of covariance with the pre-treatment scores as the covariate.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 52
Est. completion date December 2012
Est. primary completion date August 2012
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 6 Years to 12 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- children in school years who were diagnosed as language with or with speech impairment by a qualified speech therapist; and

- children failed in a standardized language assessment

Exclusion Criteria:

- children with sensory impairment and other diagnosed developmental disorders such as autism.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Behavioral:
Syntax treatment via sentence-combining method
Sentence combining method is a discrete trial method that teaches children to form complex sentences of a same structure through drilling and modeling. Treatments are conduced by school-speech therapist once two weeks for 8 sessions.
Syntax treatment managed by narrative-based treatment
Target structures are embedded into narrative stories. Children are exposed to these stories and are scaffolded to form the target sentence structure through answering questions, cloze passage and story retell. Treatment are conduced by school-speech therapist once two weeks for 8 sessions.

Locations

Country Name City State
Hong Kong Carol K. S. TO Hong Kong HK

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
The University of Hong Kong

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Hong Kong, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Changes from baseline in language scores based on a standardized language assessment All the children were followed for about 6 months in the middle of the school year when they received regular therapy from their school speech-therapists. Children's language skills were assessed by research speech therapists using a standardized language assessment pre and post treatment. Children were followed up to 6 months No