Full Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears Clinical Trial
Official title:
Early Mobilization Following Mini-Open Rotator Cuff Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Verified date | October 2021 |
Source | University of Alberta |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The primary objective of this study is to determine if early active range of motion after mini-open rotator cuff repair in adults results in improved shoulder range of motion at 6 weeks and 3 months after surgery. The secondary objective of this study is to determine if early mobilization improves disease-specific quality of life and promotes earlier return to work/function. Hypothesis: Adults undergoing mini-open rotator cuff repair will have faster recovery of range of motion, improved disease specific quality of life and earlier return to work/function if allowed to begin early active range of motion compared to subjects who are immobilized in a sling for 6 weeks.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 189 |
Est. completion date | December 2013 |
Est. primary completion date | January 2013 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 85 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: Clinical: - males and females over 18 years of age - failed non-operative management defined as persistent pain and/or disability following 3 months of conservative medical treatment including analgesic/anti-inflammatory medications, intra-articular corticosteroids, activity modification and physical therapy. Radiological: - confirmed full-thickness rotator cuff tear on arthrogram or MRI Surgical: - full-thickness tear of the rotator cuff confirmed through arthroscopy - rotator cuff repairable using mini-open approach Exclusion Criteria: - previous shoulder surgery - previous fracture of scapula or humerus - history of charcot joint or inflammatory arthropathy - cervical radiculopathy - active joint or systemic infection - neurological disorder - significant paralysis of the rotator cuff, deltoid or shoulder girdle musculature - major medical illness (life expectancy less than 2 years or unacceptably high operative risk) - unable to speak or read English - immunosuppressive therapy or chronic steroids (eg. prednisone) - patient unwilling to be followed for 2 years - psychiatric illness that precludes informed consent |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Canada | Grey Nuns Community Hospital | Edmonton | Alberta |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Alberta |
Canada,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Change in Range of Motion (ROM)From Baseline to 24 Months | Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) compared shoulder ROM between groups over time. Standing: Active flexion, scaption, abduction, extension, internal rotation (vertebral level).
Supine Lying: Active and passive flexion, abduction, external rotation (arm at side), external rotation (arm at 90 degrees abduction), internal rotation (arm at side), internal rotation (arm at 90 degrees abduction),and horizontal adduction. |
Baseline, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, 24 months | |
Secondary | Pain Questionnaire | Shoulder pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) where zero equals no pain and 10 is the worst possible pain at rest and with activity. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) compared pain between groups over time. | Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, 24 months | |
Secondary | WORC Questionnaire | Health related quality of life was measured using the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC). It is a 21-item disease specific questionnaire representing five quality of life domains (physical symptoms, sports and recreation, work, lifestyle and emotions). Each response is marked on a 100mm line in a VAS format with a maximum raw score of 2100, where zero represents the best and 2100 the worst score. This score is transformed to a 0-100 format, with 100 representing full shoulder function. | Baseline, 6, 12, 24 months | |
Secondary | Abduction Strength Using the Power Component of the Constant Score | The Constant Score is the most widely used shoulder evaluation questionnaire in Europe and is a shoulder specific instrument. The score is a combination of an objective physical examination (65 points) and a subjective patient self evaluation (35 points). The physical examination component includes a range of motion assessment (forward elevation, lateral elevation, internal rotation, and external rotation) worth a total of 40 points (maximum of 10 points for each motion). The remaining 25 points are attributed to the strength assessment, where patients are awarded one point for each pound of pull that the patient can resist in abduction. Therefore the total possible score on the Constant score is 100 points (best possible score = 100. In this case only the power component was used therefore the best score is 25. | Baseline, 24 months | |
Secondary | Complications | Incidence of any surgical or medical complications will be prospectively documented. | 2 & 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, 24 months |