Endometrial Serous Adenocarcinoma Clinical Trial
Official title:
Prospective Evaluation of Lymph Node Metastasis at the Time of Surgical Staging for High Risk Endometrial Cancer
Verified date | May 2024 |
Source | M.D. Anderson Cancer Center |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This clinical trial studies positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) and lymph node mapping in finding lymph node metastasis in patients with endometrial cancer that is at high risk of spreading. A PET/CT scan is a procedure that combines the pictures from a PET scan and a CT scan, which are taken at the same time from the same machine. The combined scans give more detailed pictures of areas inside the body than either scan gives by itself. Lymph node mapping uses a radioactive dye, called indocyanine green solution, to identify lymph nodes that may contain cancer cells. PET/CT and sentinel lymph node mapping may be better ways than surgery to identify cancer in the lymph nodes.
Status | Active, not recruiting |
Enrollment | 150 |
Est. completion date | April 30, 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | April 30, 2025 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Histologically confirmed high grade endometrial cancer including grade 3 endometroid, serous, clear cell, malignant mixed Mullerian tumor (MMMT) or any mixed tumor containing one of these cell types - Patients with a grade 1/2 tumors and evidence of deep myometrial invasion or cervical involvement on preoperative imaging or physical exam - Candidate for surgery - No evidence of peritoneal disease on preoperative imaging - Negative pregnancy test if of child-bearing age - No preoperative treatment for endometrial cancer including radiation or chemotherapy - Previous hormonal therapy is allowed Exclusion Criteria: - Medical co-morbidities making surgery unsafe, as determined by the primary treating physician - Any contraindications to PET/CT or lymph node mapping (inability to control serum glucose to a value of =< 200 mg/dl for fludeoxyglucose F-18 [FDG]-PET/CT) - Does not meet histologic criteria - Evidence of peritoneal or distant metastasis on preoperative imaging - Baseline creatinine (necessary for imaging studies) |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Lyndon Baines Johnson General Hospital | Houston | Texas |
United States | M D Anderson Cancer Center | Houston | Texas |
United States | MD Anderson Regional Care Center-Katy | Houston | Texas |
United States | The Woman's Hospital of Texas | Houston | Texas |
United States | MD Anderson Regional Care Center-Bay Area | Nassau Bay | Texas |
United States | MD Anderson Regional Care Center-Sugar Land | Sugar Land | Texas |
United States | MD Anderson Regional Care Center-The Woodlands | The Woodlands | Texas |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center | National Cancer Institute (NCI) |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | False negative rate of positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) | Compared with pathological findings as the gold standard. The false negative rate for the procedure and for the combination of the 2 procedures will be estimated with 90% credible intervals. The posterior probability that the false negative rate is > 10% for each procedure and for the combination of the 2 procedures will also be reported. | Baseline | |
Primary | False negative rate of sentinel lymph node mapping | Compared with pathological findings as the gold standard. The false negative rate for the procedure and for the combination of the 2 procedures will be estimated with 90% credible intervals. The posterior probability that the false negative rate is > 10% for each procedure and for the combination of the 2 procedures will also be reported. | At time of surgery | |
Secondary | Concordance for each procedure and for the combination of both procedures | The concordance for each procedure and for the combination of the 2 procedures will be estimated with 95% confidence intervals using pathologic findings as the gold standard. | At time of surgery | |
Secondary | Sensitivity of each procedure and for the combination of both procedures | The sensitivity of each procedure and for the combination of the 2 procedures will be estimated with 95% confidence intervals using pathologic findings as the gold standard. | At time of surgery | |
Secondary | Specificity of each procedure and for the combination of both procedures | The specificity of each procedure and for the combination of the 2 procedures will be estimated with 95% confidence intervals using pathologic findings as the gold standard. | At time of surgery | |
Secondary | Positive predictive value (PPV) of each procedure and for the combination of both procedures | The PPV of each procedure and for the combination of the 2 procedures will be estimated with 95% confidence intervals using pathologic findings as the gold standard. | At time of surgery | |
Secondary | Negative predictive value (NPV) of each procedure and for the combination of both procedures | The NPV of each procedure and for the combination of the 2 procedures will be estimated with 95% confidence intervals using pathologic findings as the gold standard. | At time of surgery | |
Secondary | CA-125 levels | Logistic regression methods will be used to model the logit of the probability of metastatic disease at the time of surgical staging as a function of CA-125 level, HE4 level, and other metabolic parameters including tumor intensity, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis. The odds ratio of the association between these factors and metastatic disease will be estimated with a 95% confidence interval. The logit of the probability of locoregional spread as a function of these factors will be similarly modeled. The correlations among these factors will also be estimated. | Baseline | |
Secondary | HE4 levels | Logistic regression methods will be used to model the logit of the probability of metastatic disease at the time of surgical staging as a function of CA-125 level, HE4 level, and other metabolic parameters including tumor intensity, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis. The odds ratio of the association between these factors and metastatic disease will be estimated with a 95% confidence interval. The logit of the probability of locoregional spread as a function of these factors will be similarly modeled. The correlations among these factors will also be estimated. | Baseline | |
Secondary | Metabolic parameters | Logistic regression methods will be used to model the logit of the probability of metastatic disease at the time of surgical staging as a function of CA-125 level, HE4 level, and other metabolic parameters including tumor intensity, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis. The odds ratio of the association between these factors and metastatic disease will be estimated with a 95% confidence interval. The logit of the probability of locoregional spread as a function of these factors will be similarly modeled. The correlations among these factors will also be estimated. | Baseline | |
Secondary | Incidence of intra-operative complications | Morbidity and mortality data will be tabulated, including intra-operative complications. | At time of surgery | |
Secondary | Incidence of post-operative complications | Morbidity and mortality data will be tabulated, including post-operative complications. | At time of surgery |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT01010126 -
Temsirolimus and Bevacizumab in Treating Patients With Advanced Endometrial, Ovarian, Liver, Carcinoid, or Islet Cell Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01935973 -
Trametinib With or Without GSK2141795 in Treating Patients With Recurrent or Persistent Endometrial Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03660826 -
Testing the Combination of Olaparib and Durvalumab, Cediranib and Durvalumab, Olaparib and Capivasertib, and Cediranib Alone in Recurrent or Refractory Endometrial Cancer Following the Earlier Phase of the Study That Tested Olaparib and Cediranib in Comparison to Cediranib Alone, and Olaparib Alone
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01642082 -
Dalantercept in Treating Patients With Recurrent or Persistent Endometrial Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01440998 -
Dasatinib, Paclitaxel, and Carboplatin in Treating Patients With Stage III-IV or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT02728258 -
Copanlisib in Treating Patients With Persistent or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT00977574 -
Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab or Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, and Temsirolimus or Ixabepilone, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab in Treating Patients With Stage III, Stage IV, or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01225887 -
Nintedanib in Treating Patients With Recurrent or Persistent Endometrial Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01005329 -
Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy, Cisplatin, and Bevacizumab Followed by Carboplatin and Paclitaxel in Treating Patients Who Have Undergone Surgery for Endometrial Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05256225 -
Testing the Addition of Trastuzumab or Trastuzumab/Pertuzumab to the Usual Chemotherapy for HER2 Positive Endometrial Serous Carcinoma or Carcinosarcoma
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03836157 -
Mirvetuximab Soravtansine (IMGN853) and Bevacizumab in Patients With Endometrial Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Suspended |
NCT04585958 -
Testing the Combination of DS-8201a and Olaparib in HER2-Expressing Cancers With Expansion in Patients With Endometrial Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02142803 -
TORC1/2 Inhibitor MLN0128 and Bevacizumab in Treating Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma or Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT00807768 -
Pelvic Radiation Therapy or Vaginal Implant Radiation Therapy, Paclitaxel, and Carboplatin in Treating Patients With High-Risk Stage I or Stage II Endometrial Cancer
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02501954 -
Trial of Cisplatin Plus Radiation Followed by Carbo and Taxol Vs. Sandwich Therapy of Carbo and Taxol Followed Radiation Then Further Carbo and Taxol
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01307631 -
Akt Inhibitor MK2206 in Treating Patients With Recurrent or Advanced Endometrial Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02065687 -
Paclitaxel and Carboplatin With or Without Metformin Hydrochloride in Treating Patients With Stage III, IV, or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02874430 -
Metformin Hydrochloride and Doxycycline in Treating Patients With Localized Breast or Uterine Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01210222 -
Trebananib in Treating Patients With Persistent or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT00942357 -
Carboplatin and Paclitaxel With or Without Cisplatin and Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I, Stage II, Stage III, or Stage IVA Endometrial Cancer
|
Phase 3 |