Rosacea Subtype 1 (Erythematotelangiectatic) Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Post Marketing Clinical Follow-up, Randomised, Double-blind Study Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Topical Rossoseq™ With Vehicle in Rosacea Subtype 1 (Erythematotelangiectatic)
Verified date | January 2013 |
Source | PBB Entrepreneur Ltd. |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | Germany:Ethikkommission der ÄK Westfalen |
Study type | Interventional |
Rossoseq™ is registered for the treatment of inflammatory skin conditions. Rosacea is one such inflammatory skin disorder that has not been studied yet for the use of Rossoseq™. Whilst rosacea is showing features of an inflammatory skin disorder [1], particularly stage 1 is poorly understood and treatment options are limited and therefore this study - within the target indication - will contribute to the learning about rosacea.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 61 |
Est. completion date | December 2012 |
Est. primary completion date | December 2012 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years to 85 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Signed and dated informed consent prior to any study-mandated procedure - Clinically diagnosed rosacea defined by a score of =6 and =15 out of a maximum score of 30 for the primary and secondary features of the RSGS - Female subjects of childbearing potential must be using appropriate birth control Main exclusion Criteria: - Pregnancy or lactation - Women with the following menopausal symptoms within the last two years prior to screening: excessive sweating, flushing, mood changes - Ocular manifestations of rosacea - Peripheral location(s) of rosacea - Phymatous changes - Severe facial skin dryness or xerosis - Keratoconjunctivitis sicca - Flushing due to conditions other than rosacea - Any other abnormal facial skin conditions, e.g., eczema, perioral dermatitis, broken and bleeding skin on area of application - Malignancy within the past 2 years with the exception of in situ removal of basal cell carcinoma |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Germany | Study site 5 | Bochum | |
Germany | Study site 2 | Duelmen | |
Germany | Study Site 1 | Münster | |
Germany | Study site 4 | Paderborn |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
PBB Entrepreneur Ltd. |
Germany,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Symptom construct of the R-QOL | The symptom construct contains 7 symptom related items scored by the subject as ''never'', ''rarely'', ''sometimes'', ''often'' or ''all the time''. The responses are recorded on a 1 (never)-to-5 (all the time) scale. A subject's score is the average of his or her responses to the items in the construct (1-5). | Change from baseline to Week 4 | No |
Secondary | Total R-QOL | The total R-QOL is the average of all responses | Change from baseline to Week 4 | No |
Secondary | Function construct of the R-QOL | Change from baseline to Week 4 | No | |
Secondary | Emotion construct of the R-QOL | Change from baseline to Week 4 | No | |
Secondary | Total RSGS score | Change from baseline to Week 4 | No |