Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01374464
Other study ID # 11/LO/0934
Secondary ID
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase Phase 4
First received June 14, 2011
Last updated June 15, 2011
Start date August 2012
Est. completion date March 2013

Study information

Verified date June 2011
Source Royal Surrey County Hospital
Contact Gillian Foxall, MBChB, MA
Phone 07917865767
Email gillianfoxall@nhs.net
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority United Kingdom: National Health Service
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Shoulder surgery is known to be extremely painful requiring high doses of opiate analgesics (morphine) to control pain. Morphine has numerous unwanted side effects including sedation, hallucinations and vomiting.

It is now standard procedure for patients undergoing shoulder surgery to have their pain controlled by means of an injection made around the nerves where they pass through the neck to supply the shoulder with sensation (similar to the numbing injections made by the dentist before a dental procedure). This injection is called a 'nerve block'.

Nerve blocks provide complete analgesia after shoulder surgery allowing clinicians to discharge patients home on the day of surgery, pain free and with no opiate side effects. However, a side effect of nerve blocks at this level is involvement of the phrenic nerve, which is anatomically close to the injection point. This may cause (temporary) paralysis of the diaphragm and in some cases, severe respiratory dysfunction.

Research shows that reducing either the volume or the concentration of the drug injected, can reduce the consequent respiratory dysfunction. However no study has compared both volume and concentration in parallel, to see which of these has the more significant effect in reducing respiratory dysfunction. Furthermore there has been no assessment of how these changes may affect the duration of analgesia received and patient coping after discharge.

The investigators propose to conduct a double blind randomised controlled trial at the Royal Surrey County Hospital, enrolling patients presenting for elective day case arthroscopic (key hole) surgery over a period of 6 months. Patients will receive one of four treatment allocations:

1. Low concentration-high volume of local anaesthetic

2. Low concentration-low volume of local anaesthetic

3. High concentration-high volume of local anaesthetic

4. High concentration-low volume of anaesthetic drug of local anaesthetic.

The aim of this study is to inform an optimum dosing regimen for patients in order to facilitate maximal pain relief and quality of recovery with minimum respiratory dysfunction.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Not yet recruiting
Enrollment 92
Est. completion date March 2013
Est. primary completion date February 2013
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years to 80 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

All patients undergoing day case shoulder surgery that would normally be managed with a nerve block for post-operative pain relief will be considered eligible for the study. Inclusion criteria are detailed below

1. Age > 18 and < 80 years

2. American Society of Anaesthetists (ASA) grades I - III. (ASA grade determines how 'fit' a patient is for surgery, with 1 being a normal healthy patient and 5 being a moribund patient that is not expected to survive. 'Fitter' patients are being chosen as it is felt that severe associated illness may influence our results).

3. A composite pain score of 0 when assessed in the post anaesthetic care unit (PACU) at 30mins post-operatively. This will be required in order for the patient to be deemed to have an 'effective' nerve block and be entered into the study. Patients reporting pain at this point will be removed from the study and offered either a rescue brachial plexus block or alternative analgesia. (Published research by Riazi et al and by McNaught et al, indicates that 5mls of local anaesthetic solution is adequate for establishing an effective ISBPB in this immediate post-operative period).

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Significant respiratory disease including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease or unstable asthma

2. Renal or hepatic impairment

3. Allergy to local anaesthetic

4. Opiod tolerance (more then 30mg of morphine or its equivalent per day)

5. Body mass index > 40

6. Body weight < 56kg (due to potentially toxic doses of local anaesthetic drug if using higher volume of 0.75% concentration at below this weight)

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Supportive Care


Related Conditions & MeSH terms

  • Adverse Reaction to Peripheral Nerve- and Plexus-blocking Anesthetics

Intervention

Other:
Interscalene brachial plexus block
4 different administrations of levobupivicaine will be applied: High Volume, High Concentration = 15mls of 0.75% levobupivicaine High Volume, Low Concentration = 15mls of 0.5% levobupivicaine Low Volume, High Concentration = 5mls of 0.75% levobupivicaine Low Volume, Low Concentration = 5mls of 0.5% levobupivicaine

Locations

Country Name City State
United Kingdom Royal Surrey County Hospital Guildford Surrey

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Royal Surrey County Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United Kingdom, 

References & Publications (4)

al-Kaisy AA, Chan VW, Perlas A. Respiratory effects of low-dose bupivacaine interscalene block. Br J Anaesth. 1999 Feb;82(2):217-20. — View Citation

McNaught A, Shastri U, Carmichael N, Awad IT, Columb M, Cheung J, Holtby RM, McCartney CJ. Ultrasound reduces the minimum effective local anaesthetic volume compared with peripheral nerve stimulation for interscalene block. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Jan;106(1):124-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq306. Epub 2010 Nov 8. — View Citation

Riazi S, Carmichael N, Awad I, Holtby RM, McCartney CJ. Effect of local anaesthetic volume (20 vs 5 ml) on the efficacy and respiratory consequences of ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Oct;101(4):549-56. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen229. Epub 2008 Aug 4. — View Citation

Urmey WF, Talts KH, Sharrock NE. One hundred percent incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis associated with interscalene brachial plexus anesthesia as diagnosed by ultrasonography. Anesth Analg. 1991 Apr;72(4):498-503. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change from baseline in Functional Vital Capacity post interscalene brachial plexus block The functional vital capacity refers to the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. Measuring FVC is done by spirometry. 30 minutes after waking in post operative care unit Yes
Secondary Quality of recovery from surgery By means of a quality of recovery questionnaire First 24 hours post-operatively No