Prolapse of Vaginal Vault After Hysterectomy Clinical Trial
Official title:
Prophylactic Uterosacral Ligament Suspension at the Time of Hysterectomy for Prevention of Vaginal Vault Prolapse (PULS)
Verified date | February 2020 |
Source | Kaiser Permanente |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Is routine uterosacral ligament suspension an appropriate clinical adjunct at the time of
hysterectomy?
The answers to these questions will facilitate the treatment of many American women. With the
results of this study, the investigators would anticipate a reduction in the number of
surgeries for pelvic organ prolapse. In addition, if uterosacral ligament suspension was
shown to be ineffective, it would not be used routinely in the setting of hysterectomy and
women will be spared the additional procedure and possibility of side effects or
complications.
The relative risks and benefits of adding a prophylactic uterosacral ligament suspension at
the time of hysterectomy in women without symptomatic prolapse symptoms have never been
studied prospectively.
Status | Active, not recruiting |
Enrollment | 800 |
Est. completion date | February 21, 2021 |
Est. primary completion date | February 21, 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 21 Years to 99 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Eligibility for primary procedure (hysterectomy either total or supracervical, performed either vaginally or abdominally, via laparoscopic or open approach) - Eligibility for secondary procedure (uterosacral ligament suspension colpopexy) - Prolapse in any compartment not extending beyond the hymen as measured by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitative system - No subjective complaints of Pelvic Organ Prolapse as determined by answer "no" to questions #3 of the short form of Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory: #3. Do you usually have a bulge or something falling out that you can see or feel in the vaginal area? Exclusion Criteria: - Contraindication for uterosacral ligament suspension colpopexy. (Surgeon's judgment that a contraindication to uterosacral ligament suspension colpopexy exists). - Anticipated geographic relocation within the 12 months after surgery - Inability to provide informed consent or to complete testing or data collection. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Kaiser Permanente San Diego | San Diego | California |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Kaiser Permanente | Massachusetts General Hospital |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | To compare the occurrence of objective findings of pelvic organ prolapse beyond hymen after uterosacral ligament suspension of the vaginal apex at the time of hysterectomy vs. hysterectomy alone using Pelvic Floor Quantitative Examination | one year and annual thereafter for 5 years |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT01347021 -
Compare Sacrospinous Fixation Versus High Uterosacral Ligament Fixation for Uterus Vaginal Prolapse III/IV
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03120689 -
VITOM Study: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.
|
N/A |