Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01252459
Other study ID # AG NUK/RT 2010-1
Secondary ID
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase Phase 2
First received December 2, 2010
Last updated December 15, 2010
Start date July 2011
Est. completion date July 2014

Study information

Verified date December 2010
Source University Hospital Freiburg
Contact Anca-Ligia Grosu, Prof. Dr. med.
Phone 0049-761-270
Email gliaa@uniklinik-freiburg.de
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Germany: Ethics CommissionGermany: Federal Office for Radiation Protection
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study is designed to evaluate the impact of radiotherapy target volume delineation based on AA-PET compared to target volume delineation based on contrast enhanced T1 weighted MRI (T1Gd-MRI) on the clinical outcome of patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) as well as concerning therapeutic safety of the respective strategy.


Description:

The higher sensitivity and specificity of amino-acids (L-[methyl-11C]-methionine, MET and O-(2-(1)-Fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine, FET) positron emission tomography (AA-PET) in the diagnosis of gliomas in comparison to computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was demonstrated in many studies and is the rationale for using them in target volume delineation of these tumors. Several clinical trials have demonstrated the significant differences between AA-PET and standard MRI in gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation for treatment planning.

A small prospective study in patients with recurrent high grade gliomas treated with stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy (SFRT) showed a significant improvement in survival when AA-PET or single photon emission tomography (AA-SPECT) were integrated in target volume delineation, in comparison to patients treated using CT/MRI alone (Grosu et al. 2005).

However, there are no randomized studies demonstrating the impact of AA-PET based irradiation treatment on the clinical follow-up in comparison to a traditional MRI/CT based treatment.

The goal of this study is to evaluate the impact of radiotherapy target volume delineation based on AA-PET (new strategy) on the clinical outcome of patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) compared to target volume delineation based on contrast enhanced T1 weighted MRI (T1Gd-MRI) (traditional, established strategy). Concerning therapeutic safety, the topography of recurrence outside the primary target volume as well as the localization of necrosis after the re-irradiation will be determined. All side effects will be assessed by CTCAE version 4.0 and the safety analyses will present the worst grade of acute and late side effect by treatment arm for the whole study period (treatment and follow up). Patients will be asked to complete a quality of life (QoL) questionnaire (as assessed by the E-ORTC QLQ-C15 PAL) in regular time intervals.

This will be the first phase II randomized study evaluating the impact of molecular imaging on outcome after radiotherapy in brain tumor patients.

Another goal of the technical part of this study is the development of a standardized physical-technical methodology for the integration of AA-PET and other imaging biomarkers in tumor volume delineation in radiation therapy.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Not yet recruiting
Enrollment 200
Est. completion date July 2014
Est. primary completion date July 2013
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Local recurrence of GBM (WHO grade IV) and either not eligible for tumor resection or with macroscopic residual tumor after resection of recurrent GBM

- Recurrent tumor visible on AA-PET and MRI-T1-Gd with the diameter measuring 1 cm to 6 cm by either technique

- Target volume definition possible according to both study arms

- Previous radiation therapy of the primary with a maximal total dose 60 Gy

- At least 9 months since the end of pre-irradiation and randomisation

- At most 2 prior chemotherapy regimes

- Start of radiation therapy possible within 2 weeks from AA-PET

- Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) = 70%

- Age = 18 years

- Written informed consent (IC) obtained

Exclusion Criteria:

- - No histological confirmation of Glioma at initial diagnosis)

- Recent (= 4 weeks before IC) histological result showing no tumor recurrence

- No recurrent tumor detectable on last AA-PET or MRI-T1-Gd

- Technical impossibility to use existing AA-PET for RT-planning

- No prior radiation treatment to the primary tumor

- less than 9 months between the end of first radiation treatment and randomisation

- more than 2 previous chemotherapy regimes or previous treatment with Avastin or other molecular targeted therapies

- less than 2 weeks between application of chemotherapy and randomisation

- additional chemotherapy or molecular targeted therapy or further surgery planned before diagnosis of further tumor progression after study intervention

- pregnancy, nursing or patient not willing to prevent pregnancy during treatment

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Radiation:
Radiation Therapy
Experimental intervention (Arm A): High-precision re-irradiation (stereotactic fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) and/or image guided radiation therapy, (IGRT), total dose 39 Gy, 3 Gy/d, 5x/ week. Target volume delineation based on AA-PET: GTV = AA uptake on PET, clinical target volume (CTV) = GTV+3mm, PTV = CTV+2mm
Radiation Therapy
Control intervention (Arm B): High-precision re-irradiation (SFRT and/or IGRT), total dose 39 Gy, 3 Gy/d, 5x/ week. Target volume delineation based on T1Gd-MRI: GTV = contrast enhancement on T1Gd-MRI, CTV = GTV+3mm, PTV = CTV+2mm

Locations

Country Name City State
Germany Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Freiburg Freiburg i. Br. Baden-Wuerttemberg

Sponsors (4)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University Hospital Freiburg AG-NUK-RT, Clinical Trials Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Germany, 

References & Publications (8)

Grosu AL, Feldmann H, Dick S, Dzewas B, Nieder C, Gumprecht H, Frank A, Schwaiger M, Molls M, Weber WA. Implications of IMT-SPECT for postoperative radiotherapy planning in patients with gliomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Nov 1;54(3):842-54. — View Citation

Grosu AL, Lachner R, Wiedenmann N, Stärk S, Thamm R, Kneschaurek P, Schwaiger M, Molls M, Weber WA. Validation of a method for automatic image fusion (BrainLAB System) of CT data and 11C-methionine-PET data for stereotactic radiotherapy using a LINAC: first clinical experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Aug 1;56(5):1450-63. — View Citation

Grosu AL, Piert M, Weber WA, Jeremic B, Picchio M, Schratzenstaller U, Zimmermann FB, Schwaiger M, Molls M. Positron emission tomography for radiation treatment planning. Strahlenther Onkol. 2005 Aug;181(8):483-99. Review. — View Citation

Grosu AL, Weber W, Feldmann HJ, Wuttke B, Bartenstein P, Gross MW, Lumenta C, Schwaiger M, Molls M. First experience with I-123-alpha-methyl-tyrosine spect in the 3-D radiation treatment planning of brain gliomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 May 1;47(2):517-26. — View Citation

Grosu AL, Weber WA, Franz M, Stärk S, Piert M, Thamm R, Gumprecht H, Schwaiger M, Molls M, Nieder C. Reirradiation of recurrent high-grade gliomas using amino acid PET (SPECT)/CT/MRI image fusion to determine gross tumor volume for stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Oct 1;63(2):511-9. — View Citation

Grosu AL, Weber WA, Riedel E, Jeremic B, Nieder C, Franz M, Gumprecht H, Jaeger R, Schwaiger M, Molls M. L-(methyl-11C) methionine positron emission tomography for target delineation in resected high-grade gliomas before radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Sep 1;63(1):64-74. — View Citation

Grosu AL, Weber WA. PET for radiation treatment planning of brain tumours. Radiother Oncol. 2010 Sep;96(3):325-7. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.08.001. Epub 2010 Aug 20. Review. — View Citation

Weber WA, Wester HJ, Grosu AL, Herz M, Dzewas B, Feldmann HJ, Molls M, Stöcklin G, Schwaiger M. O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine and L-[methyl-11C]methionine uptake in brain tumours: initial results of a comparative study. Eur J Nucl Med. 2000 May;27(5):542-9. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Progression Free Survival (PFS) 6 months after randomization No
Secondary Overall survival Kaplan-Meier: Performed on the per protocol population - all patients who are eligible and have started their allocated treatment 1 year after randomisation No
Secondary Volumetrical assessment of GTV and PTV Volumetrical assessment of delineated gross tumor volume (GTV) and planning target volume (PTV) based on AA-PET vs. delineated GTV/PTV based on T1-Gd-MRI. Interim analysis No
Secondary Topography of recurrence local relationship between recurrence and AA-PEt and MRI-derived TV Follow up (end of radiotherapy, 6 and 12 weeks after radiotherapy, then every 3 months) No
Secondary Localisation of necrosis after re-irradiation Follow up (end of radiotherapy, 6 and 12 weeks after radiotherapy, then every 3 months) Yes
Secondary Rate of long-term survivors Rate of long-term survivors = Survivors > 1 year after randomisation Follow up No
Secondary Quality of Life (QoL) QoL assessed by the EORTC QlQ-C 15 PAL questionnaire During Radiotherapy and Follow Up No
Secondary Rate of side effects Assessed according to CTCAE During Radiotherapy and Follow Up Yes