Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
| NCT number |
NCT00937924 |
| Other study ID # |
20075810 |
| Secondary ID |
|
| Status |
Completed |
| Phase |
Phase 4
|
| First received |
|
| Last updated |
|
| Start date |
February 2008 |
| Est. completion date |
June 2012 |
Study information
| Verified date |
February 2024 |
| Source |
University of California, Irvine |
| Contact |
n/a |
| Is FDA regulated |
No |
| Health authority |
|
| Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare meperidine/midazolam with diphenhydramine,
meperidine/midazolam with promethazine, and meperidine/midazolam with placebo as sedation
methods. The investigators are interested to see whether adjunct sedatives (diphenhydramine
and promethazine) will improve sedation.
Description:
Comparing sedation techniques during invasive endoscopic procedures such as ERCP and EUS is a
relatively unexplored area of clinical research. In particular, the effectiveness of adjunct
sedatives such as diphenhydramine and promethazine during ERCP/EUS procedures has not been
studied. Achieving a moderate sedation level may be ideal for ERCP/EUS procedures in order to
provide adequate patient comfort, amnesia, and completion of intended endoscopic procedures.
The relevance of further studies in this area is apparent. In terms of clinical practice;
over-sedation can lead to decreased airway protection, longer post-procedural recovery times,
and unnecessary drug cost; under-sedation can lead to patient anxiety, agitation, recall, and
longer procedural time.