Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00937924
Other study ID # 20075810
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 4
First received
Last updated
Start date February 2008
Est. completion date June 2012

Study information

Verified date February 2024
Source University of California, Irvine
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare meperidine/midazolam with diphenhydramine, meperidine/midazolam with promethazine, and meperidine/midazolam with placebo as sedation methods. The investigators are interested to see whether adjunct sedatives (diphenhydramine and promethazine) will improve sedation.


Description:

Comparing sedation techniques during invasive endoscopic procedures such as ERCP and EUS is a relatively unexplored area of clinical research. In particular, the effectiveness of adjunct sedatives such as diphenhydramine and promethazine during ERCP/EUS procedures has not been studied. Achieving a moderate sedation level may be ideal for ERCP/EUS procedures in order to provide adequate patient comfort, amnesia, and completion of intended endoscopic procedures. The relevance of further studies in this area is apparent. In terms of clinical practice; over-sedation can lead to decreased airway protection, longer post-procedural recovery times, and unnecessary drug cost; under-sedation can lead to patient anxiety, agitation, recall, and longer procedural time.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 304
Est. completion date June 2012
Est. primary completion date June 2012
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 75 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Willing participants between 18 and 75 years of age who present for ERCP or EUS at H.H. Comprehensive Chao Digestive Disease Center. Exclusion Criteria: - History of allergic or adverse reactions to midazolam, diphenhydramine, or promethazine. - Acute asthma, narrow angle glaucoma, concurrent use of potent inhibitors of CYP3A4 (amprenavir, atazanavir, or ritonavir), pregnancy, or the inability to consent. - Patients with conditions that preclude safe conscious sedation will be excluded.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Meperidine, Midazolam

Diphenhydramine

Promethazine


Locations

Country Name City State
United States H.H. Chao Comprehensive Digestive Disease Center Orange California

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of California, Irvine

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Average Percentage of Sedation Failures The percentage of participants who could not complete the procedure due inability to achieve proper sedation level From onset of sedation to completion of procedure, approximately 1 hour.
Primary Time to Achieve Adequate Level of Sedation to Begin Procedure Pre-Endoscopic Procedure (up to 1 hour maximum)
Primary Time for Recovery Post-Endoscopic Procedure
Secondary Adverse Symptoms From Sedative Agents Approximately 3 hours.
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT00919074 - Comparison of Double Wire Technique With Pancreatic Duct Stent Placement for Difficult Bile Duct Cannulation N/A
Completed NCT04628949 - A Single-Use Duodenoscope in a Real-World Setting N/A