Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00617279
Other study ID # PPT 07-05
Secondary ID
Status Terminated
Phase Phase 4
First received December 18, 2007
Last updated December 8, 2011
Start date December 2007
Est. completion date February 2010

Study information

Verified date December 2011
Source W.L.Gore & Associates
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority United States: Institutional Review Board
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The primary patency of the GORE PROPATEN Vascular Graft is equivalent to or better than disadvantaged autologous vein graft in an infragenicular peripheral bypass application at 12 months.


Description:

Primary patency is defined as hemodynamic evidence of blood flow through an open graft that has maintained uninterrupted patency and has not previously undergone a revision to restore blood flow. A disadvantaged autologous vein is defined as meeting at least one of the two following criteria: (1) Any autologous vein(s) other than greater saphenous vein deemed usable by the Investigator; (2) Usable ipsilateral or contralateral autologous greater saphenous vein that meets any of the following criteria: (a) Diameter of less than or equal to 3.0 mm; (b) Inadequate length requiring splicing; (c) Poor quality vein that is either sclerotic or phlebitic.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Terminated
Enrollment 31
Est. completion date February 2010
Est. primary completion date February 2010
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 21 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

1. Patient requires below-knee bypass secondary to severe claudication, rest pain or tissue loss due to peripheral arterial occlusive disease.

2. Patient meets the disadvantaged autologous vein criteria described in Section 4.1.

3. Patient has a post-operative life expectancy greater than one year.

4. Patient is at least 21 years of age.

5. Patient is able to comply with all study requirements and be available for follow-up visits at 1, 6, 12, 24 and 36-months post-procedure.

6. Patient is willing and able to provide written, informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Patient has had a previous instance of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia type 2 (HIT-2) or has known hypersensitivity to heparin.

2. Patient requires an infragenicular bypass for reasons other than peripheral arterial occlusive disease.

3. Patient requires sequential extremity revascularizations or other procedures that require use of additional vascular grafts.

4. Patient is in need of, or is scheduled for, a cardiac surgical procedure or a different vascular surgical procedure within 30 days of study procedure. However, inflow procedures that facilitate the bypass are permitted, as long as they are not performed at the same sitting as the bypass procedure.

5. Patient has been previously randomized for this study.

6. Patient has active infection in the region of graft placement.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
GORE PROPATEN Vascular Graft
Arterial Occlusion Bypass
Procedure:
Disadvantaged Autologous Vein Graft
Arterial Occlusion Bypass

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Albany Medical Center Albany New York
United States Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta Georgia
United States University of Maryland Medical Center Baltimore Maryland
United States Vascular Specialty Associates Baton Rouge Louisiana
United States University Of Alabama Medical Center Birmingham Alabama
United States Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston Massachusetts
United States Montifiore Medical Center Bronx New York
United States University of Chicago Chicago Illinois
United States Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio
United States Greenville Hospital System Greenville South Carolina
United States The Methodist Hospital System Houston Texas
United States University of Tennessee medical Center Knoxville Tennessee
United States Medical Center of Central Georgia Macon Georgia
United States Sentara Norfolk Hospital Norfolk Virginia
United States Peripheral Vascular Associates San Antonio Texas
United States Stonybrook University Medical Center Stony Brook New York
United States Georgetown University Hospital Washington District of Columbia

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
W.L.Gore & Associates

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Number of Patients With Primary Patency at 12 Months Post-procedure Primary patency is defined as hemodynamic evidence of blood flow through an open graft that has maintained uninterrupted patency and has not previously undergone a revision to restore blood flow. 12 months No
Primary Major Adverse Event Occurrences Through One Month Post-procedure The number of Major Adverse Event occurrences through one month post-procedure. A major adverse event requires significant therapy, including unplanned increase in the level of care, permanent sequelae, hospitalization, or death. This outcome measure presents the number of Major Adverse Event occurrences (i.e. - one patient could have multiple occurrences), and differs from the Serious Adverse Events reporting measure, which presents the number of patients that have been affected by a Serious Adverse Event. one month post-index procedure Yes
Secondary Number of Patients With Primary Patency at One Month Post-procedure Primary patency is defined as hemodynamic evidence of blood flow through an open graft that has maintained uninterrupted patency and has not previously undergone a revision to restore blood flow. One month No
Secondary Number of Patients With Primary Patency at 6 Months Post-procedure Primary patency is defined as hemodynamic evidence of blood flow through an open graft that has maintained uninterrupted patency and has not previously undergone a revision to restore blood flow. 6 months No
Secondary Number of Patients With Assisted Primary Patency at One Month Post-procedure Assisted primary patency is defined as hemodynamic evidence of blood flow through an open graft that has previously undergone revision(s) within the graft to restore blood flow prior to occlusion. The number of patients analyzed at 1 month post-procedure does not equal the number of patients originally enrolled into the study. This is due to the fact that a number of enrolled patients did not have their 1 month follow-up visit (or failed to attend their 1 month visit) prior to the termination of the study. One month No
Secondary Number of Patients With Assisted Primary Patency at 6 Months Post-procedure Assisted primary patency is defined as hemodynamic evidence of blood flow through an open graft that has previously undergone revision(s) within the graft to restore blood flow prior to occlusion. 6 months No
Secondary Number of Patients With Assisted Primary Patency at 12 Months Post-procedure Assisted primary patency is defined as hemodynamic evidence of blood flow through an open graft that has previously undergone revision(s) within the graft to restore blood flow prior to occlusion. 12 months No
Secondary Number of Patients With Secondary Patency at One Month Secondary patency is defined as hemodynamic evidence of blood flow through an open graft that has previously undergone revision(s) to restore blood flow after occlusion. One month No
Secondary Number of Patients With Secondary Patency at 6 Months Secondary patency is defined as hemodynamic evidence of blood flow through an open graft that has previously undergone revision(s) to restore blood flow after occlusion. 6 months No
Secondary Number of Patients With Secondary Patency at 12 Months Secondary patency is defined as hemodynamic evidence of blood flow through an open graft that has previously undergone revision(s) to restore blood flow after occlusion. 12 months No
Secondary Number of Patients With Limb Salvage (no Major Amputations) at One Month Post-procedure Limb salvage is defined as relief from symptoms sufficient to prevent major amputation. An amputation is considered to be major when there is surgical removal of a portion of the study leg that would preclude standing and walking without a prosthesis. One month Yes
Secondary Number of Patients With Limb Salvage (no Major Amputations) at 6 Months Post-procedure Limb salvage is defined as relief from symptoms sufficient to prevent major amputation. An amputation is considered to be major when there is surgical removal of a portion of the study leg that would preclude standing and walking without a prosthesis. 6 months Yes
Secondary Number of Patients With Limb Salvage (no Major Amputations) at 12 Months Post-procedure Limb salvage is defined as relief from symptoms sufficient to prevent major amputation. An amputation is considered to be major when there is surgical removal of a portion of the study leg that would preclude standing and walking without a prosthesis. 12 months Yes
Secondary Patients Experiencing Major Adverse Events Through 6 Months Post-procedure A major adverse event requires significant therapy, including unplanned increase in the level of care, permanent sequelae, hospitalization, or death. 6 months Yes
Secondary Patients Experiencing Major Adverse Events Through 12 Months Post-procedure A major adverse event requires significant therapy, including unplanned increase in the level of care, permanent sequelae, hospitalization, or death. 12 months Yes
Secondary Number of Patients Surviving at One Month One month Yes
Secondary Number of Patients Surviving at 6 Months 6 months Yes
Secondary Number of Patients Surviving at 12 Months 12 months Yes
Secondary Number of Patients With Wound/Graft Infection Through One Month Post-procedure Wound/graft infection was not specifically defined in the protocol and was left to the Investigator's standard of care. One month Yes
Secondary Number of Patients With Wound/Graft Infection Through 6 Months Wound/graft infection was not specifically defined in the protocol and was left to the Investigator's standard of care. 6 months Yes
Secondary Number of Patients With Wound/Graft Infection Through 12 Months Wound/graft infection was not specifically defined in the protocol and was left to the Investigator's standard of care. 12 months Yes
Secondary Number of Patients With Delayed Wound Healing Through One Month Post-procedure Delayed wound healing was not specifically defined in the protocol and was left to the Investigator's standard of care. One month Yes
Secondary Number of Patients With Delayed Wound Healing Through 6 Months Post-procedure Delayed wound healing was not specifically defined in the protocol and was left to the Investigator's standard of care. 6 months Yes
Secondary Number of Patients With Delayed Wound Healing Through 12 Months Post-procedure Delayed wound healing was not specifically defined in the protocol and was left to the Investigator's standard of care. 12 months Yes
Secondary Change in Quality of Life as Evaluated by the SF-36v2® Health Survey From Baseline Through One Month Post-procedure The SF-36v2 Health Survey asks 36 questions to measure health and well-being from the patient's point of view. The responses to these questions can be presented as physical component summary and mental component summary scores. An increase in score from baseline indicates an improvement in the patient's condition and a decrease in score from baseline indicates a decline in the patient's condition. The subscale and total score ranges from 0 to 100 but is normalized so that a score of 50 is the population mean, with a standard deviation of 10. One month No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05961943 - RESPONSE-2-PAD to Reduce Sedentary Time in Peripheral Arterial Disease Patients N/A
Completed NCT02900274 - "All Comers" Post Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) With Multi-LOC for flOw liMiting Outcomes (LOCOMOTIVE Extended)
Withdrawn NCT01938924 - Surgical Revascularisation and Nerve Stimulation Trial N/A
Completed NCT00740207 - Pilot Study to Compare ISOVUE®-250 and VISIPAQUEâ„¢ 270 for Motion Artifact and Pain in Peripheral DSA Phase 4
Active, not recruiting NCT06056193 - The SIR-POBA Bypass Trial N/A
Recruiting NCT06082466 - FRAMED Infrainguinal Venous Bypass Versus Conventional Autologous Bypass Trial N/A
Completed NCT05590182 - CO2-Angiography-Study to Evaluate Diagnostic and Safety to Patients With Peripher Arterial Stenotic or Occlusive Disease. N/A
Recruiting NCT03638115 - The VaSecure BTK Study N/A
Recruiting NCT01774058 - The Arterial Measurement of the Blood Flow Volume After Iloprost Stimulation Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT00566436 - Remote Endarterectomy Versus Suprageniculate Femoropopliteal Bypass N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT00863967 - Early Detection of Arteriosclerosis N/A
Recruiting NCT05586022 - Risk Factors for Adverse Outcomes of Endovascular Revascularization in Lower Extremity Arteriosclerosis Occlusion
Completed NCT02929095 - The Effect of Remifentanil-dexmedetomidine Compared With Remifentanil-midazolam on Patient's Satisfaction N/A
Completed NCT02832570 - Sildenafil Efficacy Study on Time Walk From Peripheral Arterial Desease Patients (Stade II) With Arterial Claudication Phase 3
Terminated NCT01341340 - The ABSORB BTK (Below The Knee) Clinical Investigation N/A
Completed NCT02867501 - Venous Distension in Patients With Aneurysmatic Arterial Disease N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT02460042 - Clinical Post Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) on Peripheral Arteries Treated With SeQuent® Please Over The Wire (OTW)
Completed NCT01855412 - Observational Study to Evaluate PAD Treatment Clinical and Economic Outcomes
Terminated NCT00717639 - Vasovist Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) in Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease Phase 4
Completed NCT00459888 - Cryoplasty CLIMB-registry Phase 4