Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00523991
Other study ID # 205.365
Secondary ID A44710082006-006
Status Completed
Phase Phase 4
First received July 9, 2007
Last updated May 12, 2014
Start date April 2007

Study information

Verified date May 2014
Source Boehringer Ingelheim
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Belgium: Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products, FAMHPCanada: Health Canada - Therapeutic Products DirectorateCzech Republic: State Institute for Drug Control (SUKL), CZ-100 41 Prague 10Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical DevicesGreat Britain: MHRAGreece: National Organization of Medicines (EOF)Netherlands: Central Committee on Research involving Human Subjects (CCMO)Portugal: National Pharmacy and Medicines InstituteUkraine: Ministry of Health Care of Ukraine (MoH of Ukraine)United States: Food and Drug Administration
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

A 24 week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 18mcg of tiotropium inhalation capsules administered by Handihaler once daily plus Pro Re Nata (PRN) albuterol (salbutamol) vs. placebo plus PRN albuterol (salbutamol) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease subjects naive to maintenance therapy.


Other known NCT identifiers
  • NCT00460772

Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 457
Est. completion date
Est. primary completion date July 2010
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 40 Years to 80 Years
Eligibility Inclusion criteria:

All subjects must have a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) according to Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (GOLD) guideline criteria:

post-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in one Second/Forced Vital Capacity (FEV1/FVC) ratio < 70% (visit 1).

Subjects must be GOLD Stage II and have a post-bronchodilator FEV1 >50% and < 80% of predicted normal (visit 1). Subjects must be current or ex-smokers with a smoking history of >=10 pack years.

Subjects must have a Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnea score >= 2.

Exclusion criteria:

Subjects who have been treated with maintenance medications for chronic respiratory disease within six months prior to screening.

Subjects with significant diseases other than COPD. Subjects on chronic systemic corticosteroids.

Subjects with any upper and/or lower respiratory tract infection or COPD exacerbation in the 6 weeks prior to the initial visit 1 or during the screening period prior to visit 3 Subjects with a recent (past 6 months) myocardial infarction, any unstable or life threatening cardiac arrhythmia requiring intervention or change in drug therapy during the last year; or who have been hospitalized for cardiac failure during the past year.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double-Blind, Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
tiotropium
Oral inhalation once daily of 18mcg tiotropium via handihaler
Placebo
Oral inhalation once daily of placebo matching tiotropium via handihaler

Locations

Country Name City State
Belgium 205.365.1103 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Gilly
Belgium 205.365.1059 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Leuven
Belgium 205.365.1057 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Menen
Belgium 205.365.1058 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Yvoir
Canada 205.365.1056 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Kingston Ontario
Canada 205.365.1041 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Ste-Foy Quebec
Canada 205.365.1104 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Toronto Ontario
Canada 205.365.1042 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Vancouver British Columbia
Czech Republic 205.365.1064 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Cvikov
Czech Republic 205.365.1107 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Hradec Kralove
Czech Republic 205.365.1061 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Karlovy Vary
Czech Republic 205.365.1077 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Liberec
Czech Republic 205.365.1079 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Neratovice
Czech Republic 205.365.1116 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Pardubice
Czech Republic 205.365.1062 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Praha 10
Czech Republic 205.365.1083 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Praha 3
Czech Republic 205.365.1117 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Praha 6
Czech Republic 205.365.1075 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Strakonice
Czech Republic 205.365.1063 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Tabor
Czech Republic 205.365.1076 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Usti nad Labem
Germany 205.365.1055 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Berlin
Germany 205.365.1066 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Berlin
Germany 205.365.1054 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Gelnhausen
Germany 205.365.1052 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Rüdersdorf
Germany 205.365.1050 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Ulm
Greece 205.365.1067 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Athens
Greece 205.365.1127 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Athens
Greece 205.365.1126 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Thessaloniki
Netherlands 205.365.1070 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Enschede
Netherlands 205.365.1072 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Etten Leur
Netherlands 205.365.1071 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Spijkenisse
Netherlands 205.365.1069 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Zutphen
Portugal 205.365.1025 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Amadora
Portugal 205.365.1020 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Coimbra
Portugal 205.365.1022 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Lisboa
Ukraine 205.365.1128 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Dnipropetrovsk
Ukraine 205.365.1110 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Kharkiv
Ukraine 205.365.1108 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Kharkov
Ukraine 205.365.1112 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Kharkov
Ukraine 205.365.1114 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Kiev
Ukraine 205.365.1115 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Kiev
Ukraine 205.365.1113 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Simferopol
United Kingdom 205.365.44002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Garston, Watford
United Kingdom 205.365.44003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Harrow
United Kingdom 205.365.44004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Warminster
United States 205.365.1010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Albuquerque New Mexico
United States 205.365.1012 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Baltimore Maryland
United States 205.365.1003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Birmingham Alabama
United States 205.365.1004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Birmingham Alabama
United States 205.365.1086 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Bloomington Minnesota
United States 205.365.1080 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Charlotte North Carolina
United States 205.365.1118 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Cincinnati Ohio
United States 205.365.1122 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Clarksburg West Virginia
United States 205.365.1098 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Jasper Alabama
United States 205.365.1092 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Kingsport Tennessee
United States 205.365.1024 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Lexington Kentucky
United States 205.365.1085 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Omaha Nebraska
United States 205.365.1023 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Palo Alto California
United States 205.365.1033 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
United States 205.365.1006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Rochester Minnesota
United States 205.365.1007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Rochester New York
United States 205.365.1125 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site San Diego California

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Boehringer Ingelheim Pfizer

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Belgium,  Canada,  Czech Republic,  Germany,  Greece,  Netherlands,  Portugal,  Ukraine,  United Kingdom, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change From Baseline in Lung Function as Measured by the Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve From 0-3h (AUC0-3h) Change = Week 24 Value - Baseline Value baseline, week 24 No
Secondary Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)(Baseline) Trough FEV1 defined as the FEV1 measured at 10 minutes prior to the end of the dosing interval, approximately 24 hours post drug administration. Baseline FEV1 was the pre-treatment FEV1 measured at Week 0 in the morning 10 minutes prior to the administration of the first dose of the study medication. Baseline No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (at Week 8) Trough FEV1 defined as the FEV1 measured at 10 minutes prior to the end of the dosing interval, approximately 24 hours post drug administration. Baseline FEV1 was the pre-treatment FEV1 measured at Week 0 in the morning 10 minutes prior to the administration of the first dose of the study medication. Baseline, week 8 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (at Week 16) Trough FEV1 defined as the FEV1 measured at 10 minutes prior to the end of the dosing interval, approximately 24 hours post drug administration. Baseline FEV1 was the pre-treatment FEV1 measured at Week 0 in the morning 10 minutes prior to the administration of the first dose of the study medication. Baseline, week 16 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (at Week 24) Trough FEV1 defined as the FEV1 measured at 10 minutes prior to the end of the dosing interval, approximately 24 hours post drug administration. Baseline FEV1 was the pre-treatment FEV1 measured at Week 0 in the morning 10 minutes prior to the administration of the first dose of the study medication. Baseline, week 24 No
Secondary Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (Baseline) Peak FEV1 defined as the maximum of the observed values over 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes post-dose for FEV1. Baseline No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (at Week 8) Peak FEV1 defined as the maximum of the observed values over 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes post-dose for FEV1. Peak response was defined as the change from baseline to the peak FEV1 value at the final visit. Baseline, week 8 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (at Week 16) Peak FEV1 defined as the maximum of the observed values over 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes post-dose for FEV1. Peak response was defined as the change from baseline to the peak FEV1 value at the final visit. Baseline, week 16 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (at Week 24) Peak FEV1 defined as the maximum of the observed values over 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes post-dose for FEV1. Peak response was defined as the change from baseline to the peak FEV1 value at the final visit. Baseline, week 24 No
Secondary Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (Baseline, Pre-dose) Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (baseline, pre-dose) Baseline No
Secondary Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (Baseline, 30 Minutes) Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (baseline, 30 minutes) baseline, 30 minutes No
Secondary Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (Baseline, 60 Minutes) Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (baseline, 60 minutes) baseline, 60 minutes No
Secondary Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (Baseline, 120 Minutes) Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (baseline, 120 minutes) Baseline, 120 minutes No
Secondary Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (Baseline, 180 Minutes) Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (baseline, 180 minutes) Baseline, 180 minutes No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (at Week 8, Pre-dose) Change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (at week 8, pre-dose) baseline, week 8, pre-dose No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (at Week 8, 30 Minutes) Change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (at week 8, 30 minutes) Baseline, week 8, 30 minutes No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (at Week 8, 60 Minutes) Change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (at week 8, 60 minutes) baseline, week 8, 60 minutes No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (at Week 8, 120 Minutes) Change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (at week 8, 120 minutes) baseline, week 8, 120 minutes No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (at Week 8, 180 Minutes) Change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (at week 8, 180 minutes) baseline, week 8, 180 minutes No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (at Week 16, Pre-dose) Change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (at week 16, pre-dose) baseline, week 16, pre-dose No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (at Week 16, 30 Minutes) Change from baseline in peak forced expiratory volume in 1 second (at week 16, 30 minutes) Baseline, week 16, 30 minutes No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (at Week 16, 60 Minutes) Change from baseline in peak forced expiratory volume in 1 second (at week 16, 60 minutes) baseline, week 16, 60 minutes No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (at Week 16, 120 Minutes) Change from baseline in peak forced expiratory volume in 1 second (at week 16, 120 minutes) baseline, week 16, 120 minutes No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (at Week 16, 180 Minutes) Change from baseline in peak forced expiratory volume in 1 second (at week 16, 180 minutes) baseline, week 16, 180 minutes No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (at Week 24, Pre-dose) Change from baseline in peak forced expiratory volume in 1 second (at week 24, pre-dose) baseline, week 24, pre-dose No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (at Week 24, 30 Minutes) Change from baseline in peak forced expiratory volume in 1 second (at week 24, 30 minutes) baseline, week 24, 30 minutes No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (at Week 24, 60 Minutes) Change from baseline in peak forced expiratory volume in 1 second (at week 24, 60 minutes) baseline, week 24, 60 minutes No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (at Week 24, 120 Minutes) Change from baseline in peak forced expiratory volume in 1 second (at week 24, 120 minutes) baseline, week 24, 120 minutes No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (at Week 24, 180 Minutes) Change from baseline in peak forced expiratory volume in 1 second (at week 24, 180 minutes) baseline, week 24, 180 minutes No
Secondary FVC AUC0-3 at Baseline Forced vital capacity (FVC) area under the curve from 0-3 hours (AUC0-3h) baseline No
Secondary FVC AUC0-3 at Week 8 Minus Baseline Change from baseline in Forced vital capacity (FVC) area under the curve from 0-3 hours (AUC0-3h) (week 8) baseline, week 8 No
Secondary FVC AUC0-3 at Week 16 Minus Baseline Change from baseline in Forced vital capacity (FVC) area under the curve from 0-3 hours (AUC0-3h)(week 16) baseline, week 16 No
Secondary FVC AUC0-3 at Week 24 Minus Baseline Change from baseline in Forced vital capacity (FVC) area under the curve from 0-3 hours (AUC0-3h) (week 24) baseline, week 24 No
Secondary Trough Forced Vital Capacity (Baseline) Trough FVC defined as the FVC measured at 10 minutes prior to the end of the dosing interval, approximately 24 hours post drug administration. Baseline FVC was the pre-treatment FVC measured at Week 0 in the morning 10 minutes prior to the administration of the first dose of the study medication. baseline No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Vital Capacity (at Week 8) Trough FVC defined as the FVC measured at 10 minutes prior to the end of the dosing interval, approximately 24 hours post drug administration. Baseline FVC was the pre-treatment FVC measured at Week 0 in the morning 10 minutes prior to the administration of the first dose of the study medication. baseline, week 8 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Vital Capacity (at Week 16) Trough FVC defined as the FVC measured at 10 minutes prior to the end of the dosing interval, approximately 24 hours post drug administration. Baseline FVC was the pre-treatment FVC measured at Week 0 in the morning 10 minutes prior to the administration of the first dose of the study medication. baseline, week 16 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Vital Capacity (at Week 24) Trough FVC defined as the FVC measured at 10 minutes prior to the end of the dosing interval, approximately 24 hours post drug administration. Baseline FVC was the pre-treatment FVC measured at Week 0 in the morning 10 minutes prior to the administration of the first dose of the study medication. baseline, week 24 No
Secondary Peak Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Baseline) Peak FEV1 defined as the maximum of the observed values over 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes post-dose for FEV1. baseline No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Peak Forced Vital Capacity (at Week 8) Peak FEV1 defined as the maximum of the observed values over 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes post-dose for FEV1. Peak response was defined as the change from baseline to the peak FEV1 value at the final visit. baseline, week 8 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Peak Forced Vital Capacity (at Week 16) Peak FEV1 defined as the maximum of the observed values over 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes post-dose for FEV1. Peak response was defined as the change from baseline to the peak FEV1 value at the final visit. baseline, week 16 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Peak Forced Vital Capacity (at Week 24) Peak FEV1 defined as the maximum of the observed values over 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes post-dose for FEV1. Peak response was defined as the change from baseline to the peak FEV1 value at the final visit. baseline, week 24 No
Secondary Forced Vital Capacity (Baseline, Pre-dose) Forced vital capacity (baseline, pre-dose) baseline No
Secondary Forced Vital Capacity (Baseline, 30 Minutes) Forced vital capacity (baseline, 30 minutes) baseline, 30 minutes No
Secondary Forced Vital Capacity (Baseline, 60 Minutes) Forced vital capacity (baseline, 60 minutes) baseline, 60 minutes No
Secondary Forced Vital Capacity (Baseline, 120 Minutes) Forced vital capacity (baseline, 120 minutes) baseline, 120 minutes No
Secondary Forced Vital Capacity (Baseline, 180 Minutes) Forced vital capacity (baseline, 180 minutes) baseline, 180 minutes No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (Week 8, Pre-dose) Change from baseline in forced vital capacity (week 8, pre-dose) baseline, week 8, pre-dose No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (Week 8, 30 Minutes) Change from baseline in forced vital capacity (week 8, 30 minutes) baseline, week 8, 30 minutes No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (Week 8, 60 Minutes) Change from baseline in forced vital capacity (week 8, 60 minutes) baseline, week 8, 60 minutes No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (Week 8, 120 Minutes) Change from baseline in forced vital capacity (week 8, 120 minutes) baseline, week 8, 120 minutes No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (Week 8, 180 Minutes) Change from baseline in forced vital capacity (week 8, 180 minutes) baseline, week 8, 180 minutes No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (Week 16, Pre-dose) Change from baseline in forced vital capacity (week 16, pre-dose) baseline, week 16, pre-dose No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (Week 16, 30 Minutes) Change from baseline in forced vital capacity (week 16, 30 minutes) baseline, week 16, 30 minutes No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (Week 16, 60 Minutes) Change from baseline in forced vital capacity (week 16, 60 minutes) baseline, week 16, 60 minutes No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (Week 16, 120 Minutes) Change from baseline in forced vital capacity (week 16, 120 minutes) baseline, week 16, 120 minutes No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (Week 16, 180 Minutes) Change from baseline in forced vital capacity (week 16, 180 minutes) baseline, week 16, 180 minutes No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (Week 24, Pre-dose) Change from baseline in forced vital capacity (week 24, pre-dose) baseline, week 24, pre-dose No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (Week 24, 30 Minutes) Change from baseline in forced vital capacity (week 24, 30 minutes) baseline, week 24, 30 minutes No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (Week 24, 60 Minutes) Change from baseline in forced vital capacity (week 24, 60 minutes) baseline, week 24, 60 minutes No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (Week 24, 120 Minutes) Change from baseline in forced vital capacity (week 24, 120 minutes) baseline, week 24, 120 minutes No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (Week 24, 180 Minutes) Change from baseline in forced vital capacity (week 24, 180 minutes) baseline, week 24, 180 minutes No
Secondary Albuterol Use p.r.n. (Baseline) Number of days that participants used albuterol prn per week baseline No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Albuterol Use p.r.n. - (Week 4) Difference in number of days that participants used albuterol prn per week between week 4 and baseline baseline, week 4 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Albuterol Use p.r.n. - (Week 8) Difference in number of days that participants used albuterol prn per week between week 8 and baseline baseline, week 8 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Albuterol Use p.r.n. -(Week 12) Difference in number of days that participants used albuterol prn per week between week 12 and baseline baseline, week 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Albuterol Use p.r.n. - (Week 16) Difference in number of days that participants used albuterol prn per week between week 16 and baseline baseline, week 16 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Albuterol Use p.r.n. -(Week 20) Difference in number of days that participants used albuterol prn per week between week 20 and baseline baseline, week 20 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Albuterol Use p.r.n. - (Week 24) Difference in number of days that participants used albuterol prn per week between week 24 and baseline baseline, week 24 No
Secondary Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Physician's Global Assessment (Baseline) The physician's global assessment reflected the physician's opinion of the participant's overall clinical condition with respect to COPD. The evaluation was based on the participant's use of concomitant medications, as well as the number and severity of COPD exacerbations and related emergency room visits and/or hospitalizations since the last visit. The frequency and severity of symptoms ( cough, dyspnea, wheezing) and the impact of these on the participant's ability to exercise were considered.
Range: 1-2 = Poor, 3-4 = Fair 5-6 = Good, 7-8 = Excellent.
baseline No
Secondary Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Physician's Global Assessment (Week 12) The physician's global assessment reflected the physician's opinion of the participant's overall clinical condition with respect to COPD. The evaluation was based on the participant's use of concomitant medications, as well as the number and severity of COPD exacerbations and related emergency room visits and/or hospitalizations since the last visit. The frequency and severity of symptoms ( cough, dyspnea, wheezing) and the impact of these on the participant's ability to exercise were considered.
Range: 1-2 = Poor, 3-4 = Fair 5-6 = Good, 7-8 = Excellent.
week 12 No
Secondary Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Physician's Global Assessment (Week 24) The physician's global assessment reflected the physician's opinion of the participant's overall clinical condition with respect to COPD. The evaluation was based on the participant's use of concomitant medications, as well as the number and severity of COPD exacerbations and related emergency room visits and/or hospitalizations since the last visit. The frequency and severity of symptoms ( cough, dyspnea, wheezing) and the impact of these on the participant's ability to exercise were considered.
Range: 1-2 = Poor, 3-4 = Fair 5-6 = Good, 7-8 = Excellent.
week 24 No
Secondary Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Patient's Global Assessment (Baseline) The patient's global assessment was based on the subject's need to take additional medications for breathing, their need for emergency room or hospital visits for COPD, and severity and amount of coughing, wheezing, and/or breathing discomfort experienced, and the impact of these symptoms on the subject's ability to exercise and perform daily activities.
Range: 1-2 = Poor, 3-4 = Fair 5-6 = Good, 7-8 = Excellent.
baseline No
Secondary Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Patient's Global Assessment (Week 12) The patient's global assessment was based on the subject's need to take additional medications for breathing, their need for emergency room or hospital visits for COPD, and severity and amount of coughing, wheezing, and/or breathing discomfort experienced, and the impact of these symptoms on the subject's ability to exercise and perform daily activities.
Range: 1-2 = Poor, 3-4 = Fair 5-6 = Good, 7-8 = Excellent.
week 12 No
Secondary Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Patient's Global Assessment (Week 24) The patient's global assessment was based on the subject's need to take additional medications for breathing, their need for emergency room or hospital visits for COPD, and severity and amount of coughing, wheezing, and/or breathing discomfort experienced, and the impact of these symptoms on the subject's ability to exercise and perform daily activities.
Range: 1-2 = Poor, 3-4 = Fair 5-6 = Good, 7-8 = Excellent.
week 24 No
Secondary Work Productivity as Assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire: Impairment Due to Health (Baseline) WPAI: self-administered instrument used to measure effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities and yields 4 types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed); Presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness); Work Productivity Loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism); and Activity Impairment.
Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work productivity loss, Activity Impairment Scores range from 0 to 100 for each of the above 4 types; higher scores indicate greater impairment.
baseline No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Work Productivity as Assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire: Impairment Due to Health (Week 4) WPAI: self-administered instrument used to measure effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities and yields 4 types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed); Presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness); Work Productivity Loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism); and Activity Impairment. Scores range from 0 to 100 for each of the above 4 types; higher scores indicate greater impairment. Difference refers to change in scale between week 4 and baseline. baseline, week 4 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Work Productivity as Assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire: Impairment Due to Health (Week 8) WPAI: self-administered instrument used to measure effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities and yields 4 types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed); Presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness); Work Productivity Loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism); and Activity Impairment. Scores range from 0 to 100 for each of the above 4 types; higher scores indicate greater impairment. Difference refers to change in scale between week 8 and baseline. baseline, week 8 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Work Productivity as Assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire: Impairment Due to Health (Week 12) WPAI: self-administered instrument used to measure effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities and yields 4 types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed); Presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness); Work Productivity Loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism); and Activity Impairment. Scores range from 0 to 100 for each of the above 4 types; higher scores indicate greater impairment. Difference refers to change in scale between week 12 and baseline. baseline, week 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Work Productivity as Assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire: Impairment Due to Health (Week 16) WPAI: self-administered instrument used to measure effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities and yields 4 types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed); Presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness); Work Productivity Loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism); and Activity Impairment. Scores range from 0 to 100 for each of the above 4 types; higher scores indicate greater impairment. Difference refers to change in scale between week 16 and baseline. baseline, week 16 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Work Productivity as Assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire: Impairment Due to Health (Week 20) WPAI: self-administered instrument used to measure effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities and yields 4 types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed); Presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness); Work Productivity Loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism); and Activity Impairment. Scores range from 0 to 100 for each of the above 4 types; higher scores indicate greater impairment. Difference refers to change in scale between week 20 and baseline. baseline, week 20 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Work Productivity as Assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire: Impairment Due to Health (Week 24) WPAI: self-administered instrument used to measure effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities and yields 4 types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed); Presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness); Work Productivity Loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism); and Activity Impairment. Scores range from 0 to 100 for each of the above 4 types; higher scores indicate greater impairment. Difference refers to change in scale between week 24 and baseline. baseline, week 24 No
Secondary Work Productivity as Assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire: Impairment While Working Due to Health WPAI: self-administered instrument used to measure effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities and yields 4 types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed); Presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness); Work Productivity Loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism); and Activity Impairment.
Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work productivity loss, Activity Impairment Scores range from 0 to 100 for each of the above 4 types; higher scores indicate greater impairment.
baseline No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Work Productivity as Assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire: Impairment While Working Due to Health (Week 4) WPAI: self-administered instrument used to measure effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities and yields 4 types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed); Presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness); Work Productivity Loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism); and Activity Impairment. Scores range from 0 to 100 for each of the above 4 types; higher scores indicate greater impairment. Difference refers to change in scale between week 4 and baseline. baseline, week 4 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Work Productivity as Assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire: Impairment While Working Due to Health (Week 8) WPAI: self-administered instrument used to measure effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities and yields 4 types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed); Presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness); Work Productivity Loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism); and Activity Impairment. Scores range from 0 to 100 for each of the above 4 types; higher scores indicate greater impairment. Difference refers to change in scale between week 8 and baseline. baseline, week 8 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Work Productivity as Assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire: Impairment While Working Due to Health (Week 12) WPAI: self-administered instrument used to measure effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities and yields 4 types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed); Presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness); Work Productivity Loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism); and Activity Impairment. Scores range from 0 to 100 for each of the above 4 types; higher scores indicate greater impairment. Difference refers to change in scale between week 12 and baseline. baseline, week 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Work Productivity as Assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire: Impairment While Working Due to Health (Week 16) WPAI: self-administered instrument used to measure effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities and yields 4 types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed); Presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness); Work Productivity Loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism); and Activity Impairment. Scores range from 0 to 100 for each of the above 4 types; higher scores indicate greater impairment. Difference refers to change in scale between week 16 and baseline. baseline, week 16 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Work Productivity as Assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire: Impairment While Working Due to Health (Week 20) WPAI: self-administered instrument used to measure effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities and yields 4 types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed); Presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness); Work Productivity Loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism); and Activity Impairment. Scores range from 0 to 100 for each of the above 4 types; higher scores indicate greater impairment. Difference refers to change in scale between week 20 and baseline. baseline, week 20 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Work Productivity as Assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire: Impairment While Working Due to Health (Week 24) WPAI: self-administered instrument used to measure effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities and yields 4 types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed); Presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness); Work Productivity Loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism); and Activity Impairment. Scores range from 0 to 100 for each of the above 4 types; higher scores indicate greater impairment. Difference refers to change in scale between week 24 and baseline. baseline, week 24 No
Secondary Work Productivity as Assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire: Overall Work Impairment Due to Health (Baseline) WPAI: self-administered instrument used to measure effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities and yields 4 types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed); Presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness); Work Productivity Loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism); and Activity Impairment.
Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work productivity loss, Activity Impairment Scores range from 0 to 100 for each of the above 4 types; higher scores indicate greater impairment.
baseline No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Work Productivity as Assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire: Overall Work Impairment Due to Health (Week 4) WPAI: self-administered instrument used to measure effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities and yields 4 types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed); Presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness); Work Productivity Loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism); and Activity Impairment. Scores range from 0 to 100 for each of the above 4 types; higher scores indicate greater impairment. Difference refers to change in scale between week 4 and baseline. baseline, week 4 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Work Productivity as Assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire: Overall Work Impairment Due to Health (Week 8) WPAI: self-administered instrument used to measure effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities and yields 4 types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed); Presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness); Work Productivity Loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism); and Activity Impairment. Scores range from 0 to 100 for each of the above 4 types; higher scores indicate greater impairment. Difference refers to change in scale between week 8 and baseline. baseline, week 8 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Work Productivity as Assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire: Overall Work Impairment Due to Health (Week 12) WPAI: self-administered instrument used to measure effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities and yields 4 types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed); Presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness); Work Productivity Loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism); and Activity Impairment. Scores range from 0 to 100 for each of the above 4 types; higher scores indicate greater impairment. Difference refers to change in scale between week 12 and baseline. baseline, week 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Work Productivity as Assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire: Overall Work Impairment Due to Health (Week 16) WPAI: self-administered instrument used to measure effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities and yields 4 types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed); Presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness); Work Productivity Loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism); and Activity Impairment. Scores range from 0 to 100 for each of the above 4 types; higher scores indicate greater impairment. Difference refers to change in scale between week 16 and baseline. baseline, week 16 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Work Productivity as Assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire: Overall Work Impairment Due to Health (Week 20) WPAI: self-administered instrument used to measure effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities and yields 4 types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed); Presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness); Work Productivity Loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism); and Activity Impairment. Scores range from 0 to 100 for each of the above 4 types; higher scores indicate greater impairment. Difference refers to change in scale between week 20 and baseline. baseline, week 20 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Work Productivity as Assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire: Overall Work Impairment Due to Health (Week 24) WPAI: self-administered instrument used to measure effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities and yields 4 types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed); Presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness); Work Productivity Loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism); and Activity Impairment. Scores range from 0 to 100 for each of the above 4 types; higher scores indicate greater impairment. Difference refers to change in scale between week 24 and baseline. baseline, week 24 No
Secondary Work Productivity as Assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire: Work Time Missed Due to Health (Baseline) WPAI: self-administered instrument used to measure effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities and yields 4 types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed); Presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness); Work Productivity Loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism); and Activity Impairment.
Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work productivity loss, Activity Impairment Scores range from 0 to 100 for each of the above 4 types; higher scores indicate greater impairment.
baseline No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Work Productivity as Assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire: Work Time Missed Due to Health (Week 4) WPAI: self-administered instrument used to measure effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities and yields 4 types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed); Presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness); Work Productivity Loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism); and Activity Impairment. Scores range from 0 to 100 for each of the above 4 types; higher scores indicate greater impairment. Difference refers to change in scale between week 4 and baseline. baseline, week 4 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Work Productivity as Assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire: Work Time Missed Due to Health (Week 8) WPAI: self-administered instrument used to measure effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities and yields 4 types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed); Presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness); Work Productivity Loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism); and Activity Impairment. Scores range from 0 to 100 for each of the above 4 types; higher scores indicate greater impairment. Difference refers to change in scale between week 8 and baseline. baseline, week 8 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Work Productivity as Assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire: Work Time Missed Due to Health (Week 12) WPAI: self-administered instrument used to measure effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities and yields 4 types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed); Presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness); Work Productivity Loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism); and Activity Impairment. Scores range from 0 to 100 for each of the above 4 types; higher scores indicate greater impairment. Difference refers to change in scale between week 12 and baseline. baseline, week 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Work Productivity as Assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire: Work Time Missed Due to Health (Week 16) WPAI: self-administered instrument used to measure effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities and yields 4 types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed); Presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness); Work Productivity Loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism); and Activity Impairment. Scores range from 0 to 100 for each of the above 4 types; higher scores indicate greater impairment. Difference refers to change in scale between week 16 and baseline. baseline, week 16 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Work Productivity as Assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire: Work Time Missed Due to Health (Week 20) WPAI: self-administered instrument used to measure effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities and yields 4 types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed); Presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness); Work Productivity Loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism); and Activity Impairment. Scores range from 0 to 100 for each of the above 4 types; higher scores indicate greater impairment. Difference refers to change in scale between week 20 and baseline. baseline, week 20 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Work Productivity as Assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire: Work Time Missed Due to Health (Week 24) WPAI: self-administered instrument used to measure effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities and yields 4 types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed); Presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness); Work Productivity Loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism); and Activity Impairment. Scores range from 0 to 100 for each of the above 4 types; higher scores indicate greater impairment. Difference refers to change in scale between week 24 and baseline. baseline, week 24 No
Secondary Physical Activity (Light Intensity; Baseline) in Logarithm of Average Time Spent in Minutes Per Day Light intensity is less than three metabolic equivalents.
Metabolic equivalent threshold (MET): Unit used to estimate the metabolic cost of physical activity, in terms of multiples of the subject's resting metabolic rate. One metabolic equivalent is, by convention, 3.5 ml of O2 uptake per minute per kilogram body weight, and theoretically approximates the resting metabolic rate.
ln in measure value unit means natural logarithm.
baseline No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Physical Activity (Light Intensity; Week 4) in Logarithm of Average Time Spent in Minutes Per Day Light intensity is less than three metabolic equivalents
Metabolic equivalent threshold (MET): Unit used to estimate the metabolic cost of physical activity, in terms of multiples of the subject's resting metabolic rate. One metabolic equivalent is, by convention, 3.5 ml of O2 uptake per minute per kilogram body weight, and theoretically approximates the resting metabolic rate.
ln in measure value unit means natural logarithm
baseline, week 4 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Physical Activity (Light Intensity; Week 8) in Logarithm of Average Time Spent in Minutes Per Day Light intensity is less than three metabolic equivalents
Metabolic equivalent threshold (MET): Unit used to estimate the metabolic cost of physical activity, in terms of multiples of the subject's resting metabolic rate. One metabolic equivalent is, by convention, 3.5 ml of O2 uptake per minute per kilogram body weight, and theoretically approximates the resting metabolic rate.
ln in measure value unit means natural logarithm
baseline, week 8 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Physical Activity (Light Intensity; Week 12) in Logarithm of Average Time Spent in Minutes Per Day Light intensity defined as less than three metabolic equivalents.
Metabolic equivalent threshold (MET): Unit used to estimate the metabolic cost of physical activity, in terms of multiples of the subject's resting metabolic rate. One metabolic equivalent is, by convention, 3.5 ml of O2 uptake per minute per kilogram body weight, and theoretically approximates the resting metabolic rate.
ln in measure value unit means natural logarithm
baseline, week 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Physical Activity (Light Intensity; Week 16) in Logarithm of Average Time Spent in Minutes Per Day Light intensity is less than three metabolic equivalents
Metabolic equivalent threshold (MET): Unit used to estimate the metabolic cost of physical activity, in terms of multiples of the subject's resting metabolic rate. One metabolic equivalent is, by convention, 3.5 ml of O2 uptake per minute per kilogram body weight, and theoretically approximates the resting metabolic rate.
ln in measure value unit means natural logarithm
baseline, week 16 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Physical Activity (Light Intensity; Week 20) in Logarithm of Average Time Spent in Minutes Per Day Light intensity is less than three metabolic equivalents
Metabolic equivalent threshold (MET): Unit used to estimate the metabolic cost of physical activity, in terms of multiples of the subject's resting metabolic rate. One metabolic equivalent is, by convention, 3.5 ml of O2 uptake per minute per kilogram body weight, and theoretically approximates the resting metabolic rate.
ln in measure value unit means natural logarithm
baseline, week 20 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Physical Activity (Light Intensity; Week 24) in Logarithm of Average Time Spent in Minutes Per Day Light intensity is less than three metabolic equivalents
Metabolic equivalent threshold (MET): Unit used to estimate the metabolic cost of physical activity, in terms of multiples of the subject's resting metabolic rate. One metabolic equivalent is, by convention, 3.5 ml of O2 uptake per minute per kilogram body weight, and theoretically approximates the resting metabolic rate.
ln in measure value unit means natural logarithm
baseline, week 24 No
Secondary Physical Activity (Moderate or Higher Intensity; Baseline) in Logarithm of Average Time Spent in Minutes Per Day Moderate or higher intensity is greater than or equal to three metabolic equivalents
Metabolic equivalent threshold (MET): Unit used to estimate the metabolic cost of physical activity, in terms of multiples of the subject's resting metabolic rate. One metabolic equivalent is, by convention, 3.5 ml of O2 uptake per minute per kilogram body weight, and theoretically approximates the resting metabolic rate.
ln in measure value unit means natural logarithm
baseline No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Physical Activity (Moderate or Higher Intensity; Week 4) in Logarithm of Average Time Spent in Minutes Per Day Moderate or higher intensity is greater than or equal to three metabolic equivalents
Metabolic equivalent threshold (MET): Unit used to estimate the metabolic cost of physical activity, in terms of multiples of the subject's resting metabolic rate. One metabolic equivalent is, by convention, 3.5 ml of O2 uptake per minute per kilogram body weight, and theoretically approximates the resting metabolic rate.
ln in measure value unit means natural logarithm
baseline, week 4 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Physical Activity (Moderate or Higher Intensity; Week 8) in Logarithm of Average Time Spent in Minutes Per Day Moderate or higher intensity is greater than or equal to three metabolic equivalents
Metabolic equivalent threshold (MET): Unit used to estimate the metabolic cost of physical activity, in terms of multiples of the subject's resting metabolic rate. One metabolic equivalent is, by convention, 3.5 ml of O2 uptake per minute per kilogram body weight, and theoretically approximates the resting metabolic rate.
ln in measure value unit means natural logarithm
baseline, week 8 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Physical Activity (Moderate or Higher Intensity; Week 12) in Logarithm of Average Time Spent in Minutes Per Day Moderate or higher intensity is greater than or equal to three metabolic equivalents
Metabolic equivalent threshold (MET): Unit used to estimate the metabolic cost of physical activity, in terms of multiples of the subject's resting metabolic rate. One metabolic equivalent is, by convention, 3.5 ml of O2 uptake per minute per kilogram body weight, and theoretically approximates the resting metabolic rate.
ln in measure value unit means natural logarithm
baseline, week 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Physical Activity (Moderate or Higher Intensity; Week 16) in Logarithm of Average Time Spent in Minutes Per Day Moderate or higher intensity is greater than or equal to three metabolic equivalents
Metabolic equivalent threshold (MET): Unit used to estimate the metabolic cost of physical activity, in terms of multiples of the subject's resting metabolic rate. One metabolic equivalent is, by convention, 3.5 ml of O2 uptake per minute per kilogram body weight, and theoretically approximates the resting metabolic rate.
ln in measure value unit means natural logarithm
baseline, week 16 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Physical Activity (Moderate or Higher Intensity; Week 20) in Logarithm of Average Time Spent in Minutes Per Day Moderate or higher intensity is greater than or equal to three metabolic equivalents
Metabolic equivalent threshold (MET): Unit used to estimate the metabolic cost of physical activity, in terms of multiples of the subject's resting metabolic rate. One metabolic equivalent is, by convention, 3.5 ml of O2 uptake per minute per kilogram body weight, and theoretically approximates the resting metabolic rate.
ln in measure value unit means natural logarithm
baseline, week 20 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Physical Activity (Moderate or Higher Intensity; Week 24) in Logarithm of Average Time Spent in Minutes Per Day Moderate or higher intensity is greater than or equal to three metabolic equivalents
Metabolic equivalent threshold (MET): Unit used to estimate the metabolic cost of physical activity, in terms of multiples of the subject's resting metabolic rate. One metabolic equivalent is, by convention, 3.5 ml of O2 uptake per minute per kilogram body weight, and theoretically approximates the resting metabolic rate.
ln in measure value unit means natural logarithm
baseline, week 24 No
Secondary Number of Participants With Healthy Lifestyle (Baseline) Healthy lifestyle defined as 30 minutes of activity > 3 metabolic equivalent levels for 70% of eligible days. Two categories: Yes, no baseline No
Secondary Number of Participants With Healthy Lifestyle (Week 4) Healthy lifestyle defined as 30 minutes of activity > 3 metabolic equivalent levels for 70% of eligible days. Two categories: Yes, no week 4 No
Secondary Number of Participants With Healthy Lifestyle (Week 8) Healthy lifestyle defined as 30 minutes of activity > 3 metabolic equivalent levels for 70% of eligible days. Two categories: Yes, no week 8 No
Secondary Number of Participants With Healthy Lifestyle (Week 12) Healthy lifestyle defined as 30 minutes of activity > 3 metabolic equivalent levels for 70% of eligible days. Two categories: Yes, no week 12 No
Secondary Number of Participants With Healthy Lifestyle (Week 16) Healthy lifestyle defined as 30 minutes of activity > 3 metabolic equivalent levels for 70% of eligible days. Two categories: Yes, no week 16 No
Secondary Number of Participants With Healthy Lifestyle (Week 20) Healthy lifestyle defined as 30 minutes of activity > 3 metabolic equivalent levels for 70% of eligible days. Two categories: Yes, no week 20 No
Secondary Number of Participants With Healthy Lifestyle (Week 24) Healthy lifestyle defined as 30 minutes of activity > 3 metabolic equivalent levels for 70% of eligible days. Two categories: Yes, no week 24 No
Secondary Active Energy Expenditure (Baseline) The amount of energy (kcal/day) that a person uses while physically active. baseline No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Active Energy Expenditure (Week 4) The amount of energy (kcal/day) that a person uses while physically active. baseline, week 4 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Active Energy Expenditure (Week 8) The amount of energy (kcal/day) that a person uses while physically active. baseline, week 8 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Active Energy Expenditure (Week 12) The amount of energy (kcal/day) that a person uses while physically active. baseline, week 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Active Energy Expenditure (Week 16) The amount of energy (kcal/day) that a person uses while physically active. baseline, week 16 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Active Energy Expenditure (Week 20) The amount of energy (kcal/day) that a person uses while physically active. baseline, week 20 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Active Energy Expenditure (Week 24) The amount of energy (kcal/day) that a person uses while physically active. baseline, week 24 No
Secondary Number of Steps Per Day (Baseline) Number of steps per day (baseline) baseline No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Number of Steps Per Day (Week 4) Change from baseline in number of steps per day (week 4) baseline, week 4 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Number of Steps Per Day(Week 8) Change from baseline in number of steps per day (week 8) baseline, week 8 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Number of Steps Per Day (Week 12) Change from baseline in Number of steps per day (week 12) baseline, week 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Number of Steps Per Day (Week 16) Change from baseline in number of steps per day (week 16) baseline, week 16 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Number of Steps Per Day (Week 20) Change from baseline in number of steps per day (week 20) baseline, week 20 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Number of Steps Per Day (Week 24) Change from baseline in number of steps per day (week 24) baseline, week 24 No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05043428 - The Roles of Peers and Functional Tasks in Enhancing Exercise Training for Adults With COPD N/A
Completed NCT00528996 - An Efficacy and Safety Study to Compare Three Doses of BEA 2180 BR to Tiotropium and Placebo in the Respimat Inhaler. Phase 2
Completed NCT03740373 - A Study to Assess the Pulmonary Distribution of Budesonide, Glycopyrronium and Formoterol Fumarate Phase 1
Completed NCT05393245 - Safety of Tiotropium + Olodaterol in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Patients in Taiwan: a Non-interventional Study Based on the Taiwan National Health Insurance (NHI) Data
Completed NCT05402020 - Effectiveness of Tiotropium + Olodaterol Versus Inhaled Corticosteroids (ICS) + Long-acting β2-agonists (LABA) Among COPD Patients in Taiwan
Completed NCT04011735 - Re-usable Respimat® Soft MistTM Inhaler Study
Enrolling by invitation NCT03075709 - The Development, Implementation and Evaluation of Clinical Pathways for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in Saskatchewan
Completed NCT03764163 - Image and Model Based Analysis of Lung Disease Early Phase 1
Completed NCT00515268 - Endotoxin Challenge Study For Healthy Men and Women Phase 1
Completed NCT04085302 - TARA Working Prototype Engagement Evaluation: Feasibility Study N/A
Completed NCT03691324 - Training of Inhalation Technique in Hospitalized Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Patients - a Pilot Study N/A
Completed NCT02236611 - A 12-week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Umeclidinium 62.5 Microgram (mcg) Compared With Glycopyrronium 44 mcg in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Phase 4
Completed NCT00153075 - Flow Rate Effect Respimat Inhaler Versus a Metered Dose Inhaler Using Berodual in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Phase 4
Completed NCT01017952 - A Study to Evaluate Annual Rate of Exacerbations and Safety of 3 Dosage Strengths of Fluticasone Furoate (FF)/GW642444 Inhalation Powder in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Phase 3
Completed NCT01009463 - A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fluticasone Furoate (FF)/GW642444 Inhalation Powder in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Phase 3
Completed NCT04882124 - Study of Effect of CSJ117 on Symptoms, Pharmacodynamics and Safety in Patients With COPD Phase 2
Completed NCT02853123 - Effect of Tiotropium + Olodaterol on Breathlessness in COPD Patients Phase 4
Completed NCT02619357 - Method Validation Study to Explore the Sensitivity of SenseWear Armband Gecko for Measuring Physical Activity in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) & Asthma Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05858463 - High Intensity Interval Training and Muscle Adaptations During PR N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05032898 - Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Inpatient Registry Study Stage II

External Links