Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00390689
Other study ID # 248.627
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received October 19, 2006
Last updated June 23, 2014
Start date October 2006

Study information

Verified date April 2014
Source Boehringer Ingelheim
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Japan: Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The objective of double blind phase in this trial is to compare the efficacy and safety at the fixed dose of 0.25 mg,0.5 mg and 0.75 mg pramipexole in RLS. The objective of open label phase in this trial is to investigate the long term safety and efficacy of pramipexole in RLS.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 154
Est. completion date
Est. primary completion date March 2008
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 20 Years to 80 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

1. Male or female patients between 20 and 80 years

2. Patients with a diagnosis of restless legs syndrome (RLS) according to the following diagnosis criteria of National institute of health (NIH)/International restless legs syndrome study group (IRLSSG):

1. An urge to move the legs, usually accompanied or caused by uncomfortable and unpleasant sensations in the legs.

2. The urge to move or unpleasant sensations begin or worsen during periods of rest or inactivity such as lying or sitting.

3. The urge to move or unpleasant sensations are partially or totally relieved by movement, such as walking or stretching, at least as long as the activity continues.

4. The urge to move or unpleasant sensations are worse in the evening or night than during the day or only occur in the evening or night.

3. Patients with a total score larger than 15 on the IRLS at Visit 2

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Premenopausal women who meet any of the following 1) to 3) 1) Patients who are pregnant or possibly pregnant 2) Patients who are lactating 3) Patients who wish to become pregnant during the study period

2. Patients who cannot take adequate contraceptive measures

3. Patients with a history of akathisia induced by neuroleptics

4. Patients with diabetes mellitus requiring insulin therapy

5. Patients who are judged to have microcytic anaemia by the investigator or sub-investigator

6. Patients with a history or signs of peripheral neuropathy, myelopathy, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease or other neurological diseases that may result in the occurrence of secondary RLS in the physical function tests or neurological tests

7. Patients with other sleep disorders such as abnormal behaviour during Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, narcolepsy and sleep apnoea syndrome (patients with an apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) exceeding 15 determined by polysomnography at the relevant trial site or those with loud snoring at least 5 nights/week and an experience of respiratory arrest during sleep or excessive daytime sleepiness)

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Pramipexole 0.125 mg tablet

Pramipexole 0.5 mg tablet


Locations

Country Name City State
Japan 248.627.037 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Aichi-gun, Aichi
Japan 248.627.014 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Fujisawa, Kanagawa
Japan 248.627.029 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Fukuoka, Fukuoka
Japan 248.627.032 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Hiroshima, Hiroshima
Japan 248.627.030 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Kagoshima, Kagoshima
Japan 248.627.013 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Kanagawa, Yokohama
Japan 248.627.033 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Kanazawa, Ishikawa
Japan 248.627.027 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Kawasaki, Kanagawa
Japan 248.627.023 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Kitakyusyu, Fukuoka
Japan 248.627.024 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Kitakyusyu, Fukuoka
Japan 248.627.022 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Kochi, Kochi
Japan 248.627.034 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Kodaira, Tokyo
Japan 248.627.038 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Koriyama, Fukushima
Japan 248.627.041 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Koriyama, Fukushima
Japan 248.627.039 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Kumamoto, Kumamoto
Japan 248.627.003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Kurume, Fukuoka
Japan 248.627.036 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Minato-ku, Tokyo
Japan 248.627.025 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Mitaka-shi, Tokyo
Japan 248.627.015 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Nagoya, Aichi
Japan 248.627.017 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Osaka, Osaka
Japan 248.627.011 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Otaru, Hokkaido
Japan 248.627.026 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Otsu, Shiga
Japan 248.627.002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Sakai,Osaka
Japan 248.627.010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Sapporo, Hokkaido
Japan 248.627.035 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Sapporo, Hokkaido
Japan 248.627.012 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Sendai, Miyagi
Japan 248.627.001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Shibuya-ku, Tokyo
Japan 248.627.004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Shimotsuga-gun,Tochigi
Japan 248.627.040 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo
Japan 248.627.018 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Takatsuki,Osaka
Japan 248.627.028 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Tokorozawa, Saitama
Japan 248.627.019 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Tokushima, Tokushima
Japan 248.627.016 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Toyohashi, Aichi
Japan 248.627.031 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site Urasoe, Okinawa

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Boehringer Ingelheim

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Japan, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change From Baseline in International Restless Legs Syndrome (IRLS) Total Score at 6 Weeks The International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG) proposes classification of severity based on the total score on the IRLS (0-10, mild; 11-20, moderate; 21-30, severe; 31-40, very severe). A decrease in the score of the IRLS by 10 or more points corresponds to the improvement of severity by one rank and has clinical importance. Therefore, the primary endpoint in the double-blind period was set as a decrease by 10 or more points in the mean change on the total score of the IRLS from the baseline to Visit 5 (last observation day in the double-blind period) at all doses of 0.25 mg, 0.5 mg, and 0.75 mg/day of pramipexole. Week 6 - change from baseline No
Secondary IRLS Responder The percentage of patients with 50 % or more reduction of IRLS (The measure means the percentage of high responder on the trial medications) baseline to week 6 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Total Score at 6 Weeks PSQI developed to evaluate the quality of sleep is a self-recording questionnaire consisting of 18 questions focused on 7 factors such as sleep quality, sleep period time, sleep latency, sleep efficiency, sleep difficulty, use of hypnotics, and hindrance to activities of daily living due to daytime sleepiness. Each score (0-3 points) in the respective factors was added to calculate the total score (0-21 points). Rating scale scored from 0 (best sleep) to 21 (worst sleep). Week 6 - change from baseline No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Japanese Version of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (JESS) Total Score at 6 Weeks ESS is a self-recording scale used to evaluate sleepiness experienced in daily activities and it consists of 8 items focused on specific situations such as reading books and watching television. Each score (0-3 points) to 8 questions was added simply to calculate the total ESS score. A Japanese translation of the ESS (a provisional version provided by the Japanese Respiratory Society) used so far had not been prepared through the international scale development and validation process, but the version prepared through this process was published at the 31st meeting of the Japanese Society of Sleep Research. The questions in JESS had been discussed with the original author of the ESS and their measurement concepts had been confirmed. The JESS is the Japanese version of ESS prepared through the international scale development and validation process. Rating scale scored from 0 (no daytime sleep) to 24 (worst daytime sleep) Week 6 - change from baseline No
Secondary Clinical Global Impression Global Improvement (CGI-I) Responder CGI is extensively used for risk-benefit evaluation (efficacy) of drug therapies. The CGI evaluates the severity and improvement in 7 ranks. It also evaluates the therapeutic effect and side effects in 4 ranks, separately. Rating scale from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). The percentage of patients who were evaluated as 1(very much improved) or 2(much improved) by the investigator were considered responders. baseline to week 6 No
Secondary Patient Global Impression (PGI) Responder PGI is used to evaluate a global impression by patients themselves in 7 ranks. Rating scale from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). The percentage of patients where the patient evaluated himself/herself as 1(very much better) or 2(much better)were considered responders. baseline to week 6 No
Secondary Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs (Blood Pressure and Pulse Rate in Both Supine and Standing Positions), ECG, Laboratory Tests - Double Blind Period. baseline to 6 weeks Yes
Secondary Change From Baseline in International Restless Legs Syndrome (IRLS) Total Score at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period The International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG) proposes classification of severity based on the total score on the IRLS (0-10, mild; 11-20, moderate; 21-30, severe; 31-40, very severe). Week 52 - change from baseline No
Secondary IRLS Responder for Open-label Period The percentage of patients with 50 % or more reduction of IRLS (The measure means the percentage of high responder on the trial medications) baseline to week 52 No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Total Score at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period PSQI developed to evaluate the quality of sleep is a self-recording questionnaire consisting of 18 questions focused on 7 factors such as sleep quality, sleep period time, sleep latency, sleep efficiency, sleep difficulty, use of hypnotics, and hindrance to activities of daily living due to daytime sleepiness. Each score (0-3 points) in the respective factors was added to calculate the total score (0-21 points). Rating scale scored from 0 (best sleep) to 21 (worst sleep). Week 52 - change from baseline No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Japanese Version of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (JESS) Total Score at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period ESS is a self-recording scale used to evaluate sleepiness experienced in daily activities and it consists of 8 items focused on specific situations such as reading books and watching television. Each score (0-3 points) to 8 questions was added simply to calculate the total ESS score. A Japanese translation of the ESS (a provisional version provided by the Japanese Respiratory Society) used so far had not been prepared through the international scale development and validation process, but the version prepared through this process was published at the 31st meeting of the Japanese Society of Sleep Research. The questions in JESS had been discussed with the original author of the ESS and their measurement concepts had been confirmed. The JESS is the Japanese version of ESS prepared through the international scale development and validation process. Rating scale scored from 0 (no daytime sleep) to 24 (worst daytime sleep) Week 52 - change from baseline No
Secondary Clinical Global Impression Global Improvement (CGI-I) Responder at 52 Weeks for Open-label Period CGI is extensively used for risk-benefit evaluation (efficacy) of drug therapies. The CGI evaluates the severity and improvement in 7 ranks. It also evaluates the therapeutic effect and side effects in 4 ranks, separately. Rating scale from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). The percentage of patients who were evaluated as 1(very much improved) or 2(much improved) by the investigator were considered responders. baseline to week 52 No
Secondary Patient Global Impression (PGI) Responder at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period PGI is used to evaluate a global impression by patients themselves in 7 ranks. Rating scale from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). The percentage of patients where the patient evaluated himself/herself as 1(very much better) or 2(much better)were considered responders. baseline to week 52 No
Secondary Possible Augmentation in RLS Symptoms at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period Possible augmentation defined as persistence of a state in which RLS symptoms begin to occur 2 hours earlier than the usual time zone for 5 days or more a week baseline to week 52 No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT01113710 - Non-interventional Study (NIS) in Patients With Restless Legs Syndrome in Daily Practise N/A
Completed NCT00666965 - A Placebo-Controlled Study for SPM 962 in Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) Patients Phase 2
Completed NCT00498108 - Phase 3 Open-label Extension Trial With Rotigotine in Idiopathic Restless Legs Syndrome Subjects Phase 3
Completed NCT01084551 - Study of SPM 962 in Patients With Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) Phase 3
Completed NCT00806026 - Long Term Study Of Pregabalin In Idiopathic Restless Legs Syndrome Patients Phase 3
Completed NCT01562743 - A Long-Term Extension Trial From Late Phase II of SPM 962 in Patients With Restless Legs Syndrome Phase 2

External Links