Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00154102
Other study ID # EMR 62202-013
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received September 8, 2005
Last updated June 13, 2014
Start date May 2004
Est. completion date March 2011

Study information

Verified date June 2014
Source Merck KGaA
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Belgium: Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products, FAMHP
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Drugs used against cancer work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Monoclonal antibodies, such as cetuximab, can block tumor growth in different ways. Giving combination chemotherapy together with cetuximab as first treatment after diagnosis of a metastatic colorectal cancer ('1st-line' treatment) may improve the treatment efficacy. However, it is not yet known whether giving combination chemotherapy together with cetuximab is more effective than combination chemotherapy alone. This open-label trial investigates the effectiveness of cetuximab in combination with a standard and effective chemotherapy (5-Fluorouracil (5FU)/Folinic acid (FA) plus irinotecan) for metastatic colorectal cancer in first-line setting, compared to the same chemotherapy alone on patient expressing the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor.

Patients expressing this EGF Receptor will be randomly assign in one of the 2 groups to either receive the combination chemotherapy alone or with cetuximab (open-label study) and will then be treated until progression of the disease or unacceptable toxicity occur. Regular efficacy assessments (every 8 weeks) based on imaging will be performed throughout the study together with regular safety assessments (e.g. safety labs). An independent Safety Board of experts will also monitor safety data.

After participant discontinuation from the trial, regular updates on further treatments and survival status will be requested from the investigator.

The entire study (from the first patient entering the study to the last collect of follow-up information) is 4-5 years long.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 1221
Est. completion date March 2011
Est. primary completion date December 2006
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Diagnosis of histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum

- Inoperable metastatic disease

- Immunohistochemical evidence of epidermal growth factor receptor expression in tumor tissue

- Presence of at least 1 bi-dimensionally measurable index lesion

Exclusion Criteria:

- Previous irinotecan-based chemotherapy

- Previous chemotherapy for colorectal cancer except adjuvant treatment if terminated more than 6 months before the start of study treatment

- Radiotherapy, surgery (excluding prior diagnostic biopsy) or any investigational drug in the 30 days before the start of study treatment

- Brain metastasis

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms

  • Colorectal Neoplasms
  • Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Expressing Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Intervention

Drug:
Cetuximab
Cetuximab intravenous infusion of 400mg/m^2 for the first infusion then weekly intravenous infusion of 250mg/m^2. Number of Cycles: until progression or unacceptable toxicity develops
FOLFIRI (5-Fluorouracil, Folinic acid, Irinotecan)
Bi-weekly Irinotecan infusion of 180mg/m^2, Folinic Acid infusion of 400mg/m^2 (racemic) or 200mg/m^2 (L-form), 5-Fluorouracil bolus of 400mg/m^2 followed by a 46-hour continuous infusion of 2400mg/m^2 Number of Cycles: until progression or unacceptable toxicity develops

Locations

Country Name City State
Argentina Research Site Buenos Aires
Australia Research Site Bedford Park
Australia Research Site Darlinghurst
Australia Research Site Heidelberg
Australia Research Site Nedlands
Australia Research Site West Perth
Australia Research Site Woodville
Austria Research Site Innsbruck
Austria Research Site Klagenfurt
Austria Research Site Kufstein
Austria Research Site Salzburg
Austria Research Site St. Pölten
Austria Research Site St. Veit an der Glan
Austria Research Site Wels
Austria Research Site Wien
Belgium Research Site Antwerpen
Belgium Research Site Bonheiden
Belgium Research Site Bruxelles
Belgium Research Site Edegem
Belgium Research Site Gent
Belgium Research Site Leuven
Belgium Research Site Liège
Brazil Research Site Goiania
Brazil Research Site Porto Alegre
Brazil Research Site Santo André
Brazil Research Site Sao Paulo
Bulgaria Research Site Pleven
Bulgaria Research Site Plovidiv
Bulgaria Research Site Sofia
Bulgaria Research Site Varna
Chile Research Site Santiago-Las Condes
Chile Research Site Santiago-Providencia
Czech Republic Research Site Chomutov
Czech Republic Research Site Prague
Finland Research Site Turku
France Research Site Bordeaux
France Research Site Boulogne-Billancourt
France Research Site Colmar
France Research Site Grenoble
France Research Site La Roche sur Yon
France Research Site Lorient
France Research Site Marseille
France Research Sites Nantes
France Research Site Perigueux
France Research Site Rennes Cedex
France Research Site Saint Gregoire
France Research Site Strasbourg
France Research Site Toulon
France Research Site Villejuif Cedex
Germany Research Site Dortmund
Germany Research Site Dresden
Germany Research Site Düsseldorf
Germany Research Site Essen
Germany Research Site Frankfurt am Main
Germany Research Site Freiburg
Germany Research Site Göttingen
Germany Research Site Halle
Germany Research Site Hamburg
Germany Research Site Heidelberg
Germany Research Site Homburg/Saar
Germany Research Site Jena
Germany Research Site Mainz
Germany Research Site Mannheim
Germany Research Site München
Germany Research Site Oldenburg
Germany Research Site Ulm
Greece Research Site Alexandroupolis
Greece Research Site Athens
Greece Research Site Heraklion
Hong Kong Research Site Pokfulam
Hong Kong Research Site Shatin
Hungary Research Site Budapest
Hungary Research Site Debrecen
Hungary Research Site Györ
Hungary Research Site Kecskemét
Hungary Research Site Pécs
Italy Research Site Ancona
Italy Research Site Aviano
Italy Research Site Bari
Italy Research Site Benevento
Italy Research Site Firenze
Italy Research Site Mantova
Italy Research Site Milano
Italy Research Site Modena
Italy Research Site Napoli
Italy Research Site Reggio Emilia
Italy Research Site Roma
Italy Research Site Rozzano
Korea, Republic of Research Site Seoul
Mexico Research Site Mexico
Netherlands Research Site Amsterdam
Netherlands Research Site Apeldoom
Netherlands Research Site Blaricum
Netherlands Research Site Den Haag
Netherlands Research Site Roosendaal
Netherlands Research Site Zwolle
Poland Research Site Bialystok
Poland Research Site Gliwice
Poland Research Site Krakow
Poland Research Site Opole
Poland Research Site Poznan
Poland Research Site Warsaw
Poland Research Site Wroclaw
Romania Research Site Cluj Napoca
Romania Research Site Iasi
Romania Research Site Suceava
Russian Federation Research Site Moscow
Russian Federation Research Site Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation Research Site Yaroslavl
Singapore Research Site Singapore
Slovakia Research Site Banska Bystrica
Slovakia Research Site Bratislava
Slovakia Research Site Kosice
Slovakia Research Site Trnava
Slovakia Research Site Zilina
South Africa Research Site Cape Town
South Africa Research Site Durban
South Africa Research Site Johannesburg
South Africa Research Site Port Elizabeth
South Africa Research Site Pretoria
Spain Research Site A Coruna
Spain Research Site Barcelona
Spain Research Site Cadiz
Spain Research Site Madrid
Spain Research Site Palma de Mallorca
Spain Research Site Valencia
Sweden Research Site Göteborg
Sweden Research Site Stockholm
Taiwan Research Site Changhua
Taiwan Research Site Chiayi
Taiwan Research Site Taipei
Taiwan Research Site Taoyuan
Turkey Research Site Ankara
Turkey Research Site Istanbul
Turkey Research Site Izmir
Ukraine Research Site Charkassy
Ukraine Research Site Donetsk
Ukraine Research Site Ivano-Frankivsk
Ukraine Research Site Kiev
Ukraine Research Site Krivoy Rog
Ukraine Research Site Lugansk
Ukraine Research Site Lviv
Ukraine Research Site Uzhgorod
Ukraine Research Site Zhaporozhye
United Kingdom Research Site Brighton
United Kingdom Research Site Cambridge
United Kingdom Research Site Glasgow
United Kingdom Research Site Guildford
United Kingdom Research Site Kent
United Kingdom Research Site Leicester
United Kingdom Research Site London
United Kingdom Research Site Peterborough
United Kingdom Research Site Rhyl
United Kingdom Research Site Sutton

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Merck KGaA

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

Argentina,  Australia,  Austria,  Belgium,  Brazil,  Bulgaria,  Chile,  Czech Republic,  Finland,  France,  Germany,  Greece,  Hong Kong,  Hungary,  Italy,  Korea, Republic of,  Mexico,  Netherlands,  Poland,  Romania,  Russian Federation,  Singapore,  Slovakia,  South Africa,  Spain,  Sweden,  Taiwan,  Turkey,  Ukraine,  United Kingdom, 

References & Publications (3)

Lang I, Kohne CH, Folprecht G, Nowacki MP, Cascinu S, Shchepotin I, Maurel J, Cunningham D, Zubel A, Van Cutsem E Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI in 1st-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: Quality of life (QoL) analysis of patients (pts) with KRAS wild

Van Cutsem E, Köhne CH, Hitre E, Zaluski J, Chang Chien CR, Makhson A, D'Haens G, Pintér T, Lim R, Bodoky G, Roh JK, Folprecht G, Ruff P, Stroh C, Tejpar S, Schlichting M, Nippgen J, Rougier P. Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastati — View Citation

Van Cutsem E, Lang I, Folprecht G, Nowacki M, Cascinu S, Shchepotin I, Maurel J, Cunningham D, Celik I, Kohne C Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): The influence of KRAS and BRAF biomarkers on outcome: Updated d

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Progression-free Survival (PFS) Time - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments Duration from randomization until radiological progression (based on modified World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria) or death due to any cause.
Only deaths within 60 days of last tumor assessment are considered. Patients without event are censored on the date of last tumor assessment.
Time from randomisation to disease progression, death or last tumour assessment, reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 27 July 2006 No
Primary Progression-free Survival Time (Chinese V-Ki-ras2 Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (KRAS) Wild-Type Population) - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments Duration from randomization until radiological progression (based on modified WHO criteria) or death due to any cause.
Only deaths within 60 days of last tumor assessment are considered. Patients without event are censored on the date of last tumor assessment.
Time from randomisation to disease progression, death or last tumour assessment, reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 27 July 2006 No
Primary Progression-free Survival Time (KRAS Mutant Population) - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments Duration from randomization until radiological progression (based on modified WHO criteria) or death due to any cause.
Only deaths within 60 days of last tumor assessment are considered. Patients without event are censored on the date of last tumor assessment.
Time from randomisation to disease progression, death or last tumour assessment, reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 27 July 2006 No
Secondary Overall Survival Time (OS) Time from randomization to death. Patients without event are censored at the last date known to be alive or at the clinical cut-off date, whichever is later. Time from randomisation to death or last day known to be alive, reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 31 May 2009 No
Secondary Overall Survival Time (KRAS Wild-Type Population) Time from randomization to death. Patients without event are censored at the last date known to be alive or at the clinical cut-off date, whichever is later. Time from randomisation to death or last day known to be alive reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 31 May 2009 No
Secondary Overall Survival Time (KRAS Mutant Population) Time from randomization to death. Patients without event are censored at the last date known to be alive or at the clinical cut-off date, whichever is later. Time from randomisation to death or last day known to be alive reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 31 May 2009 No
Secondary Best Overall Response Rate - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments The best overall response rate is defined as the percentage of subjects having achieved confirmed Complete Response + Partial Response as the best overall response according to radiological assessments (based on modified WHO criteria). evaluations were performed every 6 weeks until progression reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 27 July 2006 No
Secondary Best Overall Response Rate (KRAS Wild-Type Population) - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments The best overall response rate is defined as the percentage of subjects having achieved confirmed Complete Response + Partial Response as the best overall response according to radiological assessments (based on modified WHO criteria). evaluations were performed every 6 weeks until progression reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 27 July 2006 No
Secondary Best Overall Response Rate (KRAS Mutant Population) - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments The best overall response rate is defined as the percentage of subjects having achieved confirmed Complete Response + Partial Response as the best overall response according to radiological assessments (based on modified WHO criteria). evaluations were performed every 6 weeks until progression reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 27 July 2006 No
Secondary Disease Control Rate - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments The disease control rate is defined as the percentage of subjects having achieved confirmed Complete Response + Partial Response + Stable Disease as best overall response according to radiological assessments (based on modified WHO criteria). Evaluations were performed every 6 weeks until progression reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 27 July 2006 No
Secondary Duration of Response - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments Time from first assessment of Complete Response or Partial Response to disease progression or death (within 60 days of last tumor assessment).
Patients without event are censored on the date of last tumor assessment. Tumor assessments based on modified WHO criteria.
Time from first assessment of complete response or partial response to disease progression, death or last tumor assessment reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 27 July 2006 No
Secondary Participants With No Residual Tumor After Metastatic Surgery Participants with no residual tumor after on-study surgery for metastases time from first dose up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 30 Nov 2007 No
Secondary Quality of Life (QOL) Assessment European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Global Health Status Mean global health status scores (EORTC QLQ-C30) against time for each treatment group. Scores were derived from mutually exclusive sets of items, with scale scores ranging from 0 to 100 after a linear transformation. Higher scores indicate a better QoL. at baseline, at week 8, at week 16, at week 24, at week 32, and at week 40, reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 27 July 2006 No
Secondary Quality of Life Assessment (EORTC QLQ-C30) Social Functioning Mean social functioning scores (EORTC QLQ-C30) against time for each treatment group. Scores were derived from mutually exclusive sets of items, with scale scores ranging from 0 to 100 after a linear transformation. Higher scores indicate a higher level of functioning. at baseline, at week 8, at week 16, at week 24, at week 32, and at week 40, reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 27 July 2006 No
Secondary Safety - Number of Patients Experiencing Any Adverse Event Please refer to Adverse Events section for further details time from first dose up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 30 Nov 2007 Yes