Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00112502
Other study ID # 2004-0662
Secondary ID MDA-ID-02586NCI-
Status Completed
Phase Phase 2
First received
Last updated
Start date September 2005
Est. completion date September 2014

Study information

Verified date September 2021
Source M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as temozolomide, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Thalidomide may stop the growth of glioblastoma multiforme by blocking blood flow to the tumor. Isotretinoin may help cells that are involved in the body's immune response to work better. Celecoxib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. It is not yet known which temozolomide-containing regimen is more effective in treating glioblastoma multiforme. PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying eight different temozolomide-containing regimens to compare how well they work in treating patients who have undergone radiation therapy for glioblastoma multiforme.


Description:

OBJECTIVES: - Compare the efficacy of adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) alone or in combination with thalidomide and/or isotretinoin and/or celecoxib, in terms of 6-month progression-free survival, in patients who have undergone radiotherapy for supratentorial glioblastoma multiforme. - Compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients. OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 8 treatment arms. - Arm I: Patients receive oral temozolomide once daily on days 1-7 and 15-21. - Arm II: Patients receive temozolomide as in arm I and oral thalidomide once daily on days 1-28. - Arm III: Patients receive temozolomide as in arm I and oral isotretinoin twice daily on days 1-21. - Arm IV: Patients receive temozolomide as in arm I and oral celecoxib twice daily on days 1-28. - Arm V: Patients receive temozolomide as in arm I, thalidomide as in arm II, and isotretinoin as in arm III. - Arm VI: Patients receive temozolomide as in arm I, thalidomide as in arm II, and celecoxib as in arm IV. - Arm VII: Patients receive temozolomide as in arm I, isotretinoin as in arm III, and celecoxib as in arm IV. - Arm VIII: Patients receive temozolomide as in arm I, thalidomide as in arm II, isotretinoin as in arm III, and celecoxib as in arm IV. In all arms, treatment repeats every 28 days for up to 12 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patient may receive additional courses of therapy at the discretion of the treating physician. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed for at least 30 days and then every 3 months thereafter. PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 180 patients will be accrued for this study.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 178
Est. completion date September 2014
Est. primary completion date September 2014
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: - Histologically confirmed supratentorial glioblastoma multiforme - Must have undergone a biopsy OR subtotal or gross total resection of the tumor - Must have completed post-operative (or post-biopsy) radiotherapy within the past 5 weeks - No progressive disease after radiotherapy PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age - 18 and over Performance status - Karnofsky 60-100% Life expectancy - Not specified Hematopoietic - Absolute neutrophil count = 1,500/mm^3 - Platelet count = 100,000/mm^3 Hepatic - Serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase (SGPT) < 2 times upper limit of normal (ULN) - Alkaline phosphatase < 2 times ULN - Bilirubin = 1.5 mg/dL Renal - blood urea nitrogen (BUN) = 1.5 times ULN - Creatinine = 1.5 times ULN Immunologic - No history of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biological composition to celecoxib or to sulfonamides - No asthma, urticaria, or allergic reactions to aspirin or other NSAIDs - No active infection Gastrointestinal - No inflammatory bowel disease - No history of peptic ulcer disease - No gastrointestinal bleeding within past 3 months Other - Not pregnant or nursing - Negative pregnancy test - Fertile patients must use effective double-method contraception during and for 2 months after study participation - Fertile female patients randomized to receive thalidomide must use effective double-method contraception for = 4 weeks before, during, and = 4 weeks after completion of study therapy - Fertile male patients randomized to receive thalidomide must use effective contraception during and for = 4 weeks after completion of study therapy - No blood donation (for patients randomized to receive thalidomide) - No history of any other cancer except nonmelanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix or cancer that is in complete remission and patient completed all therapy for that disease = 3 years ago - No other disease that would obscure toxicity or dangerously alter drug metabolism (e.g., severe connective tissue disease) - No other serious medical illness PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy - Not specified Chemotherapy - Prior temozolomide in combination with radiotherapy allowed - No other prior or concurrent chemotherapy Endocrine therapy - Not specified Radiotherapy - See Disease Characteristics - See Chemotherapy Surgery - See Disease Characteristics - No concurrent surgery Other - No other concurrent non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (for patients randomized to receive celecoxib) - No other concurrent investigational drugs - No other concurrent anticancer therapy

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Celecoxib
400 mg orally twice a day continuous dosing
Isotretinoin
40 mg/m^2 orally twice a day (total daily dose = 80 mg/m^2) days 1-21 of a 28 day cycle.
Temozolomide
150 mg/m2 orally daily, 7 days on treatment, 7 days off.
Thalidomide
400 mg orally every day continuous dosing (starting at 200 mg each day and escalating weekly by 100 mg until the maximum dose of 400 mg/day is achieved)

Locations

Country Name City State
United States CCOP - Atlanta Regional Atlanta Georgia
United States Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute at Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center Columbus Ohio
United States CCOP - Central Illinois Decatur Illinois
United States Hembree Mercy Cancer Center at St. Edward Mercy Medical Center Fort Smith Arkansas
United States CCOP - Grand Rapids Grand Rapids Michigan
United States University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas
United States CCOP - Kalamazoo Kalamazoo Michigan
United States CCOP - Kansas City Kansas City Missouri
United States University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center at Orlando Orlando Florida
United States CCOP - Upstate Carolina Spartanburg South Carolina
United States Cancer Research for the Ozarks Springfield Missouri
United States CCOP - Wichita Wichita Kansas

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (1)

Gilbert MR, Gonzalez J, Hunter K, Hess K, Giglio P, Chang E, Puduvalli V, Groves MD, Colman H, Conrad C, Levin V, Woo S, Mahajan A, de Groot J, Yung WK. A phase I factorial design study of dose-dense temozolomide alone and in combination with thalidomide, — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Comparison of Thalidomide Arms Versus no Thalidomide Arms Thalidomide versus not Thalidomide analysis: Comparison of median PFS outcome of participants in arms II, VI, VII and VIII, versus participants in arms I, III, IV and V. Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method from time of randomization to time of progression, death, or last follow-up. Progression defined as 25% increase in the sum of products of all measurable lesions over smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease) using the same techniques as baseline, OR clear worsening of any evaluable disease, OR appearance of any new lesion/site, OR failure to return for evaluation due to death or deteriorating condition (unless clearly unrelated to this cancer). Every 2 cycles (1 cycle = 28 days) from randomization until progression of disease, death or last follow-up, up to one year (12 study cycles).
Primary Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Comparison of Celecoxib Arms Versus no Celecoxib Arms Celecoxib versus not Celecoxib analysis: We compared the median PFS outcome of participants in arms III, V, VI and VIII, versus participants in arms I, II, IV and VII. Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method from time of randomization to time of progression, death, or last follow-up. Progression defined as 25% increase in the sum of products of all measurable lesions over smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease) using the same techniques as baseline, OR clear worsening of any evaluable disease, OR appearance of any new lesion/site, OR failure to return for evaluation due to death or deteriorating condition (unless clearly unrelated to this cancer). Every 2 cycles (1 cycle = 28 days) from randomization until progression of disease, death or last follow-up.
Primary Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Comparison of Isotretinoin Arms Versus no Isotretinoin Arms Isotretinoin versus not Isotretinoin analysis: We compared the median PFS outcome of participants in arms IV, V, VII and VIII, versus participants in arms I, II, III and VI. Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method from time of randomization to time of progression, death, or last follow-up. Progression defined as 25% increase in the sum of products of all measurable lesions over smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease) using the same techniques as baseline, OR clear worsening of any evaluable disease, OR appearance of any new lesion/site, OR failure to return for evaluation due to death or deteriorating condition (unless clearly unrelated to this cancer). Every 2 cycles (1 cycle = 28 days) from randomization until progression of disease, death or last follow-up.
Secondary Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Comparison of Doublet Versus Triplet Therapy Doublet (2 agents) versus Triplet (3 agents) therapy analysis: We compared the median PFS outcome of participants in arms II, III, IV, versus participants in arms V, VI and VII. Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method from time of randomization to time of progression, death, or last follow-up. Progression defined as 25% increase in the sum of products of all measurable lesions over smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease) using the same techniques as baseline, OR clear worsening of any evaluable disease, OR appearance of any new lesion/site, OR failure to return for evaluation due to death or deteriorating condition (unless clearly unrelated to this cancer). Every 2 cycles (1 cycle = 28 days) from randomization until progression of disease, death or last follow-up.
Secondary Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) of Individual Arms Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method from time of randomization to time of progression, death, or last follow-up. Progression defined as 25% increase in the sum of products of all measurable lesions over smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease) using the same techniques as baseline, OR clear worsening of any evaluable disease, OR appearance of any new lesion/site, OR failure to return for evaluation due to death or deteriorating condition (unless clearly unrelated to this cancer). Every 2 cycles (1 cycle = 28 days) from randomization until progression of disease, death or last follow-up.
Secondary Median Overall Survival (OS) Comparison of Thalidomide Arms Versus no Thalidomide Arms Thalidomide versus not Thalidomide analysis: We compared the median OS outcome of participants in arms II, VI, VII and VIII, versus participants in arms I, III, IV and V. Median OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method from time of randomization to time of progression, death, or last follow-up. Progression defined as 25% increase in the sum of products of all measurable lesions over smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease) using the same techniques as baseline, OR clear worsening of any evaluable disease, OR appearance of any new lesion/site, OR failure to return for evaluation due to death or deteriorating condition (unless clearly unrelated to this cancer). Every 3 months from randomization until progression of disease, death or last follow-up.
Secondary Median Overall Survival (OS) Comparison of Celecoxib Arms Versus no Celecoxib Arms Celecoxib versus not Celecoxib analysis: We compared the median OS outcome of participants in arms III, V, VI and VIII, versus participants in arms I, II, IV and VII. Median OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method from time of randomization to time of progression, death, or last follow-up. Progression defined as 25% increase in the sum of products of all measurable lesions over smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease) using the same techniques as baseline, OR clear worsening of any evaluable disease, OR appearance of any new lesion/site, OR failure to return for evaluation due to death or deteriorating condition (unless clearly unrelated to this cancer). Every 3 months from randomization until progression of disease, death or last follow-up.
Secondary Median Overall Survival (OS) Comparison of Isotretinoin Arms Versus no Isotretinoin Arms Isotretinoin versus not Isotretinoin analysis: We compared the median OS outcome of participants in arms IV, V, VII and VIII, versus participants in arms I, II, III and VI. Median OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method from time of randomization to time of progression, death, or last follow-up. Progression defined as 25% increase in the sum of products of all measurable lesions over smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease) using the same techniques as baseline, OR clear worsening of any evaluable disease, OR appearance of any new lesion/site, OR failure to return for evaluation due to death or deteriorating condition (unless clearly unrelated to this cancer). Every 3 months from randomization until progression of disease, death or last follow-up.
Secondary Median Overall Survival (OS) Comparison of Doublet Versus Triplet Therapy Doublet (2 agents) versus Triplet (3 agents) therapy analysis: We compared the median OS outcome of participants in arms II, III, IV, versus participants in arms V, VI and VII. Median OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method from time of randomization to time of progression, death, or last follow-up. Progression defined as 25% increase in the sum of products of all measurable lesions over smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease) using the same techniques as baseline, OR clear worsening of any evaluable disease, OR appearance of any new lesion/site, OR failure to return for evaluation due to death or deteriorating condition (unless clearly unrelated to this cancer). Every 3 months from randomization until progression of disease, death or last follow-up.
Secondary Overall Survival of Individual Arms Overall Survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method from time of randomization to time of progression, death, or last follow-up. Progression defined as 25% increase in the sum of products of all measurable lesions over smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease) using the same techniques as baseline, OR clear worsening of any evaluable disease, OR appearance of any new lesion/site, OR failure to return for evaluation due to death or deteriorating condition (unless clearly unrelated to this cancer). Every 3 months from randomization until progression of disease, death or last follow-up.
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Terminated NCT00788125 - Dasatinib, Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, and Etoposide in Treating Young Patients With Metastatic or Recurrent Malignant Solid Tumors Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT00006080 - Fenretinide in Treating Patients With Recurrent Malignant Glioma Phase 2
Recruiting NCT00887146 - Radiation Therapy With Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide Versus Radiation Therapy With Adjuvant PCV Chemotherapy in Patients With Anaplastic Glioma or Low Grade Glioma Phase 3
Suspended NCT00935090 - 3'-Deoxy-3'-[18F] Fluorothymidine PET Imaging in Patients With Cancer N/A
Completed NCT00621686 - Bevacizumab and Sorafenib in Treating Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme Phase 2
Terminated NCT00227032 - Erlotinib in Treating Patients With Progressive Glioblastoma Multiforme Phase 1
Terminated NCT00243022 - Dietary, Herbal and Alternative Medicine in Glioblastoma Multiforme Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT00087815 - Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Treating Patients With Radiation Necrosis of the Brain N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT00278278 - Combination Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy With or Without Methotrexate in Treating Young Patients With Newly Diagnosed Gliomas Phase 3
Completed NCT00416819 - Combination Chemotherapy and Rituximab in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Primary CNS Lymphoma N/A
Completed NCT00052286 - Modafinil in Treating Fatigue and Behavioral Change in Patients With Primary Brain Cancer N/A
Completed NCT00006093 - EMD 121974 in Treating Patients With Progressive or Recurrent Glioma Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT00004129 - Phosphorus 32 in Treating Patients With Glioblastoma Multiforme Phase 1
Completed NCT00004212 - DX-8951f in Treating Children With Advanced Solid Tumors or Lymphomas Phase 1
Completed NCT00003417 - Computer Planned Radiation Therapy Plus Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Glioblastoma Multiforme Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT00003484 - Radiolabeled Monoclonal Antibody Therapy After Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Primary Brain Tumors Phase 1
Completed NCT00003173 - High-Dose Thiotepa Plus Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation in Treating Patients With Refractory Solid Tumors Phase 2
Completed NCT00008008 - Thiotepa Followed by Peripheral Stem Cell or Bone Marrow Transplant in Treating Patients With Malignant Glioma Phase 2
Completed NCT00003464 - Temozolomide in Treating Adults With Newly Diagnosed Primary Malignant Glioblastoma Multiforme Phase 2
Completed NCT00003020 - LMB-7 Immunotoxin in Treating Patients With Leptomeningeal Metastases Phase 1