Outcome
Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
Primary |
Cohort 1: Recommended Dose (RD) of Lenvatinib |
RD was defined as the dose that had a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) rate closest to the targeted 20% rate. DLT was an adverse drug reaction and was assessed according to common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version (v) 4.03 defined as 1) Grade 4 neutropenia for greater than or equal to (>=) 7 days, 2) Grade >=3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding, or lasting greater than (>) 7 days, 3) Grade >=3 febrile neutropenia, 4) Next course of chemotherapy delayed for >=7 days, 5) Grade >=3 non-hematologic toxicity persisting >7 days optimal supportive care, 6) Grade 4 hypertension, confirmed systolic or diastolic blood pressure >25 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) above the 95th percentile for age, or an elevated diastolic blood pressure (that is, >95th percentile for age) not controlled by a single antihypertensive medication within 14 days of use, 7) Grade 3 proteinuria, 8) Any recurrent Grade 2 non-hematological toxicity requiring >=2 interruption and dose reductions. |
Cycle 1 (28 days) |
|
Primary |
Cohort 2A: Number of Participants With Objective Response (OR) of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) |
OR was defined as participants with best overall response (BOR) of CR or PR as assessed by investigator based on response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version (v) 1.1. For OR, the BOR was defined as the best response (CR or PR for >4 weeks) recorded from the start of the treatment until PD or death whichever occurred first. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis <10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter (SOD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. PD was defined as at least 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. |
From date of first dose of study drug until first documentation of PD or death, whichever occurred first (until the data cut-off date, 31 May 2019) |
|
Primary |
Cohort 2A: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) |
BOR was defined as the best response of CR or PR for >4 weeks or SD for >=7 weeks recorded from the start of the treatment until PD or death, whichever occurred first based on RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis <10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest SOD. PD was defined as at least 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. |
From first dose of study drug until PD or death, whichever occurred first (until the data cut-off date, 31 May 2019) |
|
Primary |
Cohorts 2B and 3B: Progression-free Survival (PFS) Rate at Month 4 |
Progression free survival at Month 4 (PFS-4) rate was defined as the percentage of participants who were alive and without PD at Month 4 after the first dose of study drug, based on RECIST v1.1, using a binomial proportion with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). PD: >= 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, reference-smallest sum recorded in study (sum at baseline if that was smallest). Sum of diameters must have absolute increase of >=5 mm. Appearance of >=1 new lesions also considered PD. |
At Month 4 |
|
Primary |
Cohort 3A: Recommended Dose (RD) of Lenvatinib When Given in Combination With Etoposide and Ifosfamide |
RD of lenvatinib when given in combination with ifosfamide and etoposide was defined as dose that resulted in no more than 1 DLT per 6 participants,or hematologic DLT in 1 participant and nonhematologic DLT in another participant per 6 participants,upon repeating same dose level.DLT was adverse drug reaction and assessed per CTCAE v4.03 defined as 1)Grade 4 neutropenia for >=10 days,2)Grade >=3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding,or lasting >=10 days,3)Grade >=3 febrile neutropenia lasting >=7 days,4)Next course of chemotherapy delayed for >=7 days,5)Grade >=3 nonhematologic toxicity persisting >7 days despite optimal supportive care,6)Grade 4 hypertension,confirmed systolic or diastolic blood pressure >25 mmHg above 95th percentile for age,or elevated diastolic blood pressure(>95th percentile for age)not controlled by single antihypertensive medication within 14 days use,7)Grade 3 proteinuria,8)Any recurrent Grade 2 nonhematological toxicity requiring >=2 interruption and dose reductions. |
Cycle 1 (21 days) |
|
Secondary |
Cohorts 1, 2B, 3A, and 3B: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) |
BOR: best response of CR or PR for >4 weeks or SD for >=7 weeks from first dose, recorded from start of treatment until PD or death, whichever occurred first based on RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in their short axis <10 mm. PR: at least 30% decrease in SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest SOD. PD was defined as: at least 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Not evaluable (NE) means BOR of NE or SD of <7 weeks duration. Unknown means no data were available on the case report form. |
From date of first dose of study drug until PD or death, whichever occurred first (Cohort 1, Cohort 2B: until the data cut-off date, 31 May 2019; Cohort 3A, Cohort 3B: until the data cut-off date, 18 July 2019) |
|
Secondary |
Cohorts 1, 2B, 3A, and 3B: Objective Response Rate (ORR) |
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a BOR of CR or PR for >4 weeks or SD for >=7 weeks as assessed by investigator based on RECIST v1.1, recorded from start of study treatment until PD or death whichever occurred first. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis <10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. 95% CI of the ORR were calculated according to Clopper and Pearson method. |
From date of first dose of study drug until PD or death, whichever occurred first (Cohort 1, Cohort 2B: until the data cut-off date, 31 May 2019; Cohort 3A, Cohort 3B: until the data cut-off date, 18 July 2019) |
|
Secondary |
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B: Duration of Response (DOR) |
DOR was defined as time in months from the first documentation confirmed CR or PR until the first documentation of confirmed PD as assessed by investigator based on RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis <10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. PD: at least 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. 95% CI for the median were calculated according to Brookmeyer and Crowley method. |
First documentation of CR/PR until first documentation of PD (Cohort 1, Cohort 2A, Cohort 2B: until the data cut-off date, 31 May 2019; Cohort 3A, Cohort 3B: until the data cut-off date, 18 July 2019) |
|
Secondary |
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B: Number of Participants Who Experienced Disease Control |
Participants were defined as having disease control if they had a BOR of CR or PR for >4 weeks, or SD (minimum duration from first dose to SD >=7 weeks) or if participants had a BOR of CR or Non-CR/Non-PD (minimum duration from first dose to Non-CR/Non-PD >=7 weeks) per RECIST v1.1, recorded from first dose until PD or death whichever occurred first. CR: disappearance of all target/non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (target/non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis <10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference smallest SOD. Non-CR/Non-PD: persistence of 1 or more non-target lesions, maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. |
From first dose of study drug until PD or death, whichever occurred first (Cohort 1, Cohort 2A, Cohort 2B: until the data cut-off date, 31 May 2019; Cohort 3A, Cohort 3B: until the data cut-off date, 18 July 2019) |
|
Secondary |
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B: Number of Participants Experienced Clinical Benefit |
Participants were defined as having clinical benefit if they had a BOR of CR or PR for >4 weeks or durable SD (lasting >=23 weeks) or if participants had a BOR of CR or durable Non-CR/Non-PD (lasting >=23 weeks) as per RECIST v1.1, recorded from first dose until PD or death whichever occurred first. CR: disappearance of all target/non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target/non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis <10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest SOD. Non-CR/Non-PD:persistence of 1 or more non-target lesions and maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. |
From first dose of study drug until PD or death, whichever occurred first (Cohort 1, Cohort 2A, Cohort 2B: until the data cut-off date, 31 May 2019; Cohort 3A, Cohort 3B: until the data cut-off date, 18 July 2019) |
|
Secondary |
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B: Progression-free Survival (PFS) |
PFS was defined as the time (in months) from the date of first dose of study drug to the date of first documentation of PD or date of death, whichever occurred first, based on RECIST v1.1. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD of target lesions. 95% CI of median were calculated according to Brookmeyer and Crowley method. |
From first dose of study drug until PD or death, whichever occurred first (Cohort 1, Cohort 2A, Cohort 2B: until the data cut-off date, 31 May 2019; Cohort 3A, Cohort 3B: until the data cut-off date, 18 July 2019) |
|
Secondary |
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B: Time to Progression (TTP) |
TTP was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study drug to the date of first documentation of PD based on RECIST 1.1. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD of target lesions. 95% CI of median were calculated according to Brookmeyer and Crowley method. |
From first dose of study drug until PD (Cohort 1, Cohort 2A, Cohort 2B: until the data cut-off date, 31 May 2019; Cohort 3A, Cohort 3B: until the data cut-off date, 18 July 2019) |
|
Secondary |
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B: Overall Survival (OS) |
OS was defined as the time from the date of the first dose of study drug until the date of death from any cause. Participants who are lost to follow-up and those who are alive at the date of data cutoff were censored at the date the participant was last known to be alive (or the data cutoff date). 95% CI of median were calculated according to Brookmeyer and Crowley method. |
From first dose of study drug until death (Cohort 1, Cohort 2A, Cohort 2B: until the data cut-off date, 31 May 2019; Cohort 3A, Cohort 3B: until the data cut-off date, 18 July 2019) |
|
Secondary |
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) |
Number of participants with TEAEs (serious and non-serious adverse events) and SAEs were reported based on their safety assessments of hematology, clinical chemistry, proximal tibial growth, fecal occult blood, physical examinations, regular measurement of vital signs and electrocardiogram parameter values. |
From the date of first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose (up to approximately 7 years) |
|
Secondary |
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A, and 3B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post Baseline Measurements on Urine DipStick for Proteinuria |
An aliquot of the urine samples were collected to analyze protein by dipstick method, microscopic examination (if protein was abnormal). The dipstick test gives results in a semi-quantitative manner and results for urinalysis parameters of urine protein can be read as "negative, Trace, plus (+) 1, +2, +3 and +4" indicating proportional concentrations in the urine sample. The plus sign increases with a higher level of proteins in the urine. |
Baseline up to approximately 4 years 7 months |
|
Secondary |
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post Baseline Score in Lansky Performance Play Score |
Lansky Performance Play Scale rates a child's activity level for <16 years of age. Scores on scale range from 0 (unresponsive) to 100 ( fully active, normal), where 100=fully active, normal; 90=minor restrictions in physically strenuous activity; 80=active, but tires more quickly; 70=both greater restriction of and less time spent in play activity; 60=up and around, but minimal active play, keeps busy with quieter activities; 50=gets dressed, but lies around much of day, no active play, able to participant in quiet play and activities; 40=mostly in bed, participates in quiet activities; 30=in bed, needs assistance even for quiet play; 20=often sleeping, play entirely limited to very passive activities; 10=no play, does not get out of bed; 0=unresponsive. Higher score indicates more activity and lower indicates less or no activity. |
Baseline up to approximately 4 years 7 months |
|
Secondary |
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post Baseline Score in Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Scores |
KPS: compare effectiveness of medicine for disease and assess outcomes in participants. KPS Scores: recorded on 11 point scale (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 and 100%), where 0=Dead; 10=moribund, fatal processes progressing rapidly; 20=very sick, hospital admission necessary, active supportive treatment necessary; 30=severely disabled, hospital admission is indicated although death not imminent; 40=disabled, requires special care/assistance; 50=requires considerable assistance/frequent medical care; 60=requires occasional assistance, but is able to care for personal needs; 70=cares for self, unable to carry normal activity or active work; 80=normal activity with effort, some signs of disease; 90=able to carry on normal activity, minor signs of disease; 100=normal no complaints, no evidence of disease. Lower score, worse survival for most serious illnesses. |
Baseline up to approximately 4 years 7 months |
|
Secondary |
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A, and 3B: Plasma Concentrations of Lenvatinib |
Duration of each cycle for Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B is 28 days. Duration of each cycle for Cohorts 3A, 3B is 21 days. |
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B: Cycle(C)1 Day(D)1: 0.5-4 hours (h), 6-10 h post-dose, C1D15: pre-dose, 0.5-4 h, 6-10 h post-dose, C2D1: pre-dose, 2-12 h post-dose; Cohorts 3A, 3B: C1D1: 0.5-4 h, 6-10 h post-dose, C2D1: pre-dose, 2-12 h post-dose |
|
Secondary |
Cohort 2B, 3B: Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Biomarkers Level |
Serum biomarkers included Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF) 19, FGF 21, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF). In this outcome measure, percent change from baseline in serum biomarkers level per "PFS-4, Yes" and "PFS-4, No" have been reported. As per assessment of investigator based on RECIST v1.1, "PFS-4, Yes"= participants evaluable for PFS-4 month and alive and without PD at 4 months from the first dose, "PFS-4, No"=participants evaluable for PFS-4 month and not alive or with PD at 4 months from the first dose. |
Cohort 2B: Baseline, Cycle 2-3 Day 1 (Duration of each cycle=28 days); Cohort 3B: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1 (Duration of each cycle=21 days) |
|
Secondary |
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B: Number of Participants With Most Frequent Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Related to Lenvatinib Exposure |
TEAEs (serious and non-serious), those occurred most frequently have been reported in this outcome measure. "Palmar-plantar E syndrome" refers to Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome. |
First dose of study drug until 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cohort 1, Cohort 2A, Cohort 2B: until the data cut-off date, 31 May 2019; Cohort 3A, Cohort 3B: until the data cut-off date, 18 July 2019) |
|
Secondary |
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B: Number of Participants Categorized Based on Overall Acceptability Questionnaire Responses for Suspension of Lenvatinib |
In acceptability questionnaire, participants were asked to answer the overall acceptability of lenvatinib suspension considering the following elements: taste, appearance, smell and how does it feel in the mouth. Overall acceptability was answered in terms of 7 responses: Super good, really good, good, may be good or may be bad, bad, really bad, super bad. Overall acceptability was the overall acceptance for taste, appearance, smell, and the feeling in mouth. In this measure, number of participants have been reported per their overall acceptability responses. |
Cycle 1 Day 1 (Cycle length=28 days for Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B; Cycle length=21 days for Cohorts 3A, 3B) |
|