Osteoporosis Clinical Trial
Official title:
An Assessment of Treatment Adherence of Osteoporosis Patients From a Biopsychosocial Perspective to Plan a Multidisciplinary Intervention Overcame Psychosocial Barriers
This observational study aims to learn about the psychosocial risk factors of osteoporosis (OP) patients. The main question it aims to answer is: - Which biopsychosocial factors affect OP patients' fragility fracture risk regarding the health behaviour model? Participants will fulfil these forms below here; - Sociodemographic and Clinical Information Form, - Fragility Fracture Information Form - Medication Adherence Report Scale - Brief Illness Perception Scale - The Beliefs About the Medicines Scale-Specific - The Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction - Perceived Stress Scale - Multidimensional Perceived Social Support Scale - Brief Symptom Inventory - Depression and Anxiety - Health Behavior Assessment Scale
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 585 |
Est. completion date | April 15, 2026 |
Est. primary completion date | March 15, 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Diagnosis of primary or secondary osteoporosis or osteopenia with a previous fragility fracture - Taking osteoporosis medicines for at least 6 months - Volunteer to attend to study Exclusion Criteria: - Having been diagnosed with osteoporosis for less than six months - Not willing to fulfil the requirements of the study - Having a neurological (such as dementia) or psychological (such as psychosis) condition that prevents completing the scales and establishing a relationship with the tester. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Turkey | Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine | Istanbul |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Istanbul University | THE SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF TÜRKIYE (TUBITAK) |
Turkey,
Chandran M, Tan MZ, Cheen M, Tan SB, Leong M, Lau TC. Secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures--an "OPTIMAL" model of care from Singapore. Osteoporos Int. 2013 Nov;24(11):2809-17. doi: 10.1007/s00198-013-2368-8. Epub 2013 Apr 25. — View Citation
Clyne W, Mshelia C, McLachlan S, Jones P, de Geest S, Ruppar T, Siebens K, Dobbels F, Kardas P. A multinational cross-sectional survey of the management of patient medication adherence by European healthcare professionals. BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 1;6(2):e009610. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009610. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Sociodemographic and Clinical Information Form, | The form will be used to get an illness history and demographical information. There are no cut-off values since this form will give the investigators descriptive information. | through study completion; approximately 9 months | |
Primary | Medication Adherence Report Scale | This scale will be used to assess the medication adherence level of patients. The scale is scored between 5 to 25 points with lower scores indicating higher adherence level. | through study completion; approximately 9 months | |
Primary | Fragility Fracture Information Form | The form will be used to assess the fragility fracture experience of participants. There are no cut-off values since this form will give the investigators descriptive information. | through study completion; approximately 9 months | |
Primary | Health Behavior Assessment Form | The form will be used to assess the smoking, diet or alcohol consumption of participants. There are no cut-off values since this form will give the investigators descriptive information. | through study completion; approximately 9 months | |
Secondary | Brief Illness Perception Scale | The scale will be used to assess participants' illness perception and cognition. To score the Brief Illness Perception Scale questionnaire, each item is rated on a 0-10 scale, with higher scores indicating a more threatening perception of the illness. The total score is calculated by summing the scores of all seven items, with a possible range of 0-70. Higher scores indicate worse illness perception. | through study completion; approximately 9 months | |
Secondary | The Beliefs About the Medicines Scale-Specific | The scale will be used to assess the appraisal of the medicines. The Beliefs About the Medicines Scale-Specific consists of two five-item scales assessing participants' beliefs about the necessity of prescribed medication for controlling their disease and their concerns about potential adverse consequences of taking it. Respondents indicate their degree of agreement with each statement on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree. Scores obtained for individual items within both scales are summed. A mean score for each scale is computed by dividing total scores for that scale by the number of items in the scale, resulting in a mean score range of 1-5 for each scale. Higher scores indicate stronger beliefs in the concepts represented by the scale. | through study completion; approximately 9 months | |
Secondary | The Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction | The scale will be used to assess patient satisfaction comprised of a short seven-item scale that has 5-point responses, scored as 0 to 4. The scale assesses the core domains of patient satisfaction which includes treatment satisfaction, explanation of treatment results, clinician care, participation in medical decision-making, respect by the clinician, time with the clinician, and satisfaction with clinic care. The score ranges from 0 (extremely dissatisfied) to 28 (extremely satisfied), as a continuous score. Additionally, categorical scores are defined as 0-10 very dissatisfied, 11-18 dissatisfied, 19-26 satisfied, and 27-28 very satisfied. | through study completion; approximately 9 months | |
Secondary | Perceived Stress Scale | The scale will be used to assess the stress perception of participants. The scores on the Perceived Stress Scale can range from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress. Scores ranging from 0-13 would be considered low stress; scores ranging from 14-26 would be considered moderate stress, and scores ranging from 27-40 would be considered high perceived stress. | through study completion; approximately 9 months | |
Secondary | Multidimensional Perceived Social Support Scale | The scale will be used to assess the social support level of participants. The scale is a short instrument designed to measure an individual's perception of support from 3 sources: family, friends and a significant other. To calculate the total score, all 12 items are summed. This total score can also be calculated as a mean score (dividing by 12). A mean scale score ranging from 1 to 2.9 could be considered low support; a score of 3 to 5 could be considered moderate support; a score from 5.1 to 7 could be considered high support. | through study completion; approximately 9 months | |
Secondary | Brief Symptom Inventory- Depression and Anxiety | The scale is a 13-item self-report scale designed to evaluate the depression and anxiety symptoms levels of participants. This scale uses a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("extremely"). Brief Symptom Inventory- Depression and Anxiety scores can range from 0 to 52 points with higher scores indicating higher suffering from depression and anxiety symptoms. | through study completion; approximately 9 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06287502 -
Efficacy of Structured Exercise-Nutritional Intervention on Sarcopenia in Patients With Osteoporosis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03822078 -
Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Denosumab (AMG 162) in Japanese Postmenopausal Women
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05845021 -
Surgeon-Initiated Bone Health Referral Pathway in Patients Undergoing Lower Extremity Arthroplasty
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00092066 -
A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of an Investigational Drug and Dietary Supplement in Men and Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis (0217A-227)
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04754711 -
Interest of Nutritional Care of Children With Sickle Cell Disease on Bone Mineral Density and Body Composition
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04736693 -
Replication of the HORIZON Pivotal Fracture Trial in Healthcare Claims Data
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06431867 -
Primary Care Management of Osteoporosis in Older Women
|
||
Completed |
NCT02922478 -
Role of Comorbidities in Chronic Heart Failure Study
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT02616627 -
Association Between DXA Results and the Complications, Clinical Courses and Outcomes in Chronic Dialysis Patients
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT02635022 -
Fragility Fracture Liaison Service and Anti-osteoporosis Medication Monitoring Service Study
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02617303 -
Prevention of Falls and Its Consequences in Elderly People
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02566655 -
Clinical Trial of Intravenous Infusion of Fucosylated Bone Marrow Mesenchyme Cells in Patients With Osteoporosis
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT02559648 -
Denosumab vs Placebo in Patients With Thalassemia Major and Osteoporosis
|
Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02223572 -
Secondary Fracture Prevention in Patients Who Suffered From Osteoporotic Fracture
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03420716 -
Symbiotic Yogurt, Calcium Absorption and Bone Health in Young Adult Women
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT01854086 -
Compliance and Persistence With Osteoporosis Treatment and Attitude Towards Future Therapy Among Post-menopausal Israeli Women During Drug Treatment or Drug Holiday
|
N/A | |
Unknown status |
NCT01913834 -
Nasally and sc Administered Teriparatide in Healthy Volunteers
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT02003716 -
DeFRA Questionnaire as an Anamnestic Form
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01694784 -
Understanding and Discouraging Overuse of Potentially Harmful Screening Tests
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01757340 -
Calorie Restriction With Leucine Supplementation
|
N/A |