Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT03868033 |
Other study ID # |
201811067MIPC |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
Phase 4
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
April 12, 2019 |
Est. completion date |
December 31, 2023 |
Study information
Verified date |
September 2023 |
Source |
National Taiwan University Hospital |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Denosumab is a potent anti-resorptive agent and is now widely used in the treatment of
osteoporosis. Although denosumab has excellent effect to increase bone mass and prevent
fracture in FREEDOM study with very low complications, even up to ten years, it's effect is
reversible. After holding the drug, circulating denosumab levels fall rapidly, and bone
resorption reaching twice baseline levels for about 6 months. How to prevent bone loss after
denosumab therapy is an important issue, especially when considering the compliance,
persistence, or other comorbidities of the patient. We want to verify if zoledronic acid
could be used as a sequential therapy after denosumab to prevent rapid bone loss by
randomized clinical trial.
Description:
Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody directed against the protein RANK-L, the principal
regulator of osteoclast development. Thus, it acts as a potent anti-resorptive agent and is
now widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis. Because it's easily to be used with very
low risk of complications, patient has better compliance and persistence of denosumab than
bisphosphonates. It's market share increasing very rapidly in Taiwan.
Although denosumab has excellent effect to increase bone mass and prevent fracture in FREEDOM
study with very low complications, even up to ten years, it's effect is reversible. After
holding the drug, circulating denosumab levels fall rapidly, and bone resorption reaching
twice baseline levels for about 6 months. Over the first 12 months off therapy, all the bone
density gained on treatment is lost4. According to previous meta-analysis study, although the
persistence of denosumab therapy is better than bisphosphonates, only 62% patients keep the
treatment after two years. We could image how low the persistence is after five-year or
ten-year treatment in the real world.
How to prevent bone loss after denosumab therapy is an important issue, especially when
considering the compliance, persistence, or other comorbidities of the patient. There is only
one randomized controlled trial dealing with this problem, although the primary goal of the
study is designed to compare the compliance and persistence1. After switching from denosumab
to alendronate for one year, bone mineral density does not decrease rapidly, although there
is mild elevation of bone turn over marker.
We want to verify if zoledronic acid could be used as a sequential therapy after denosumab to
prevent rapid bone loss by randomized clinical trial.