View clinical trials related to Osteoporosis.
Filter by:This is a randomized, double-blind, parallel design, repeat dose, 2 arm, multicenter study comparing the efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of AVT03 and US-Prolia in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.
Non-interventional observational prospective follow-up study of cohorts of patients with Previous diagnosis of Osteoporosis with high risk of fractures, with/without previous fractures and treatment with bone formers (biosimilar or original Teriparatide), who meet all the inclusion criteria and exclusion, with prior information and signing of prior informed consent documents.
This is a randomized, double-blind, international multicentre, parallel-controlled phase III clinical study. The study plans to enroll 478 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture, whom will be randomized at 1:1 to either the experiment group (HLX14) or the control group (Prolia®) based on stratification factors (BMI (< 25, 25-30, > 30) and geographic region (Asian or non-Asian)). The study includes screening period (28 days), treatment period (total 546 days, contain treatment period 1: D1-D364, treatment period 2: D365-D546), and an end-of-study visit (D547).
To evaluate the effect of 12 months of supplementation with a probiotic (probiotic plus prebiotic; 2 capsules per day) on relative change (%) in total volumetric bone density (measured using high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography [HR-pQCT]) of the distal tibia.
This is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, parallel-arm, Phase 3 study to compare the efficacy, PK (Pharmacokinetic), PD (Pharmacodynamic), safety, and immunogenicity of Bmab 1000 and Prolia® in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis
This is a randomized, double-blind, parallel, multicenter, multinational study to compare the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and immunogenicity of MB09 versus Prolia® in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis
This study aims to evaluate the effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus supplementation on calcium status and bone densitometry in postmenopausal women in a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study.
This is a prospective specimen collection cohort study to evaluate the correlation between serum and urine values of the bone marker of interest, and their association with baseline DEXA scan measures and fracture risk within 6 months. Study samples will be obtained longitudinally. One collection of both serum and urine collection will be obtained. The urine will be collected as second void of day and at the same time the blood collection is drawn. Study will continue for a period or 1 year, with plan to enroll around 40 subjects.
Bone strength -the main determinant of bone fracture- is a function not only of bone mineral density (BMD) and microstructure, but also of its microenvironment, including bone marrow fat (BMF). The adrenal steroid dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) -the main precursor for estrogens and androgens in postmenopausal women- as well as bone-loading exercise, increase BMD in older women, however, their effects on BMF are largely unknown. This study has high potential to unveil the hormonal and mechanical effects of DHEA and exercise on BMF, respectively, and to elucidate longitudinal associations of BMF with bone strength in older women with bone loss.
A prospective study to determine how low bone mineral density and/or vertebral compression fractures associate with pain in adults with sickle cell disease