View clinical trials related to Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal.
Filter by:The primary objective of this study is to investigate the effects of 12-months supplementation with calcium-enriched permeate, taken alone or in conjunction with inulin, on changes in markers of bone formation and resorption and in bone mass density (BMD) in apparently healthy postmenopausal women compared with calcium-carbonate or maltodextrin supplementation.
A randomized, double-blind and parallel group study to compare the pharmacokinetic, safety and pharmacodynamic of MW031 and Prolia® in healthy adults.
HYPOTHESIS: - A multicomponent exercise program where strength exercises are performed with blood flow restriction obtains better values in densitometry and bone mass of osteoporotic patients with respect to the same multicomponent exercise program where strength is worked without flow restriction. INTERVENTION: The recruitment of the population will be carried out between July and November 2021, with the collaboration of the Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa (CST), which brings together a hospital center and different primary care centers (CAP). The primary care physicians and rheumatologists of the CST will receive an e-mail from the hospital management, informing them of the study to be carried out so that, if they consider it appropriate, they can inform their patients. Intervention of the intervention and control group: Each volunteer will be assigned to an intervention group either to the control group (CG) or experimental group (EG). The control group and intervention group will receive the same multicomponent exercise program, based on specific literature for being an effective, safe and feasible training for both elderly people {{2091 Bouaziz, Walid 2016;}} {{2092 Fragala,M. S. 2019;}}, with or without frailty {{2093 Cadore, Eduardo L 2014;}} {{2094 Casas-Herrero, Alvaro 2019;}} {{2088 Fernández-García, Ángel Iván 2020;}} and/or with osteoporosis {{2089 Moradell, Ana 2020;}}. The main difference between both groups is that the experimental group (EG) will perform the strength exercises with flow restriction (BFR) while the control group (CG) will not have any restriction. The periodicity of both groups will be 2 sessions per week, with a duration of 65 minutes per session and the duration of the intervention of 6 months and a follow-up 12 months after the beginning of the intervention (see scheme). The training will be supervised at all times by a physiotherapist with more than 10 years of experience in multicomponent exercise. The sessions will include both limb and trunk work and will have a clear functional objective, focusing on activities of daily living (ADL). Each session will work on all the basic physical abilities (strength, balance, endurance, flexibility and coordination) and will be divided into: - 10 minutes of initial warm-up. This is divided into 8 minutes walking on a treadmill or cyclohergometer with an intensity corresponding to 30% of heart rate reserve. Followed by 2 minutes of active mobilizations in both upper and lower extremities. - 20 minutes of strength exercises. These will be interspersed with the rest of the exercises and will include the different extremities and trunk. During the first month, training will be carried out with loads corresponding to 20% of 1 repetition maximum (RM) and from the second month onwards it will be increased to 30-35% of 1 RM. - 10 minutes of resistance exercises. These exercises will be interspersed with the rest to make the session much more enjoyable. - 10 minutes of coordination and balance exercises. These exercises will be interspersed with the rest of the activities. - 5 minutes of flexibility. These exercises will be performed interspersed with the strength and endurance exercises. - 5 minutes of return to calm and relaxation. To facilitate the monitoring of the researcher who will apply the intervention, each group will be subdivided into smaller groups (ratio of 5 subjects per researcher).
This study is a retrospective case-control study. In the study, the data of 304 patients who were evaluated in our clinic between January 2017 and January 2020 with a pre-diagnosis or diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis were retrospectively reviewed. Lumbar 1-4 and femoral neck bone mineral densitometry values T scores, ages, sedimentation, C-reactive protein, neutrophil, leukocyte and platelet levels, and mean platelet volume values of the patients were recorded. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio was calculated by dividing the neutrophil count by the lymphocyte count, and the platelet-lymphocyte ratio was calculated by dividing the platelet count by the lymphocyte count. The systemic immune inflammation index (SII) was calculated using the formula, SII = platelet count x neutrophil count / lymphocyte count. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic value of the systemic immune inflammation index in postmenopausal osteoporosis and to examine the SII, N / L, PLT / L, MPV, sedimentation (ESR), C reactive protein (CRP), femur and lumbar BMD values and their relationships with each other.
This is a single-center, randomized, open label, single-dose, the original drug controlled, crossover design, two sequence, two periods, Phase Ⅰclinical study. 64 qualified subjects will be randomly assigned to two administration sequences (sequence A and sequence B) at the ratio of 1∶1, with 32 subjects in each sequence. Each period will be given subcutaneous injection once, and the washout period will be 72 hours, and each subject will be given subcutaneous injection twice. Sequence A: the test drug (SAL001) is injected in the first period, and the reference drug (FORSTEO) is injected in the second period. Sequence B: the reference drug (FORSTEO) is injected in the first period, and the test drug (SAL001) is injected in the second period. If the geometric mean ratio (GMR) 90% confidence interval of the major pharmacokinetic indexes (AUC0-t, Cmax) for SAL001 and FORSTEO is between 80.00% and 125.00%, the two drugs are considered to be bioequivalent.
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate similar efficacy and safety between TVB-009 and Prolia® (denosumab)
The recommended dosing regimen of zoledronic acid in Chinese osteoporosis patients is completely in accordance with the one of 5 mg per year abroad that based on the dosing regimen in Paget's disease. This dosing regimen lacks the actual supportive clinical data of Chinese patients. In addition, the overall incidence of acute phase response, the main adverse event after the first infusion, in Chinese patients is higher than that in Caucasian patients population. Moreover, the results of the similar drug clinical study in the Japanese patients shown that the purpose of effective treatment for osteoporosis could be achieved with half of the dosage in Caucasian population. Thus, it could be inferred from these that the dosing regimen of zoledronic acid might be inappropriate in Chinese osteoporosis patients. Therefore, the main purpose of this clinical trail is to compare the zoledronic acid pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristic of different doses in Chinese postmenopausal subjects with low bone mass or osteoporosis and explore the best dosing regimen in Chinese patients.
Acute phase response (APR) is one of the most common adverse events in osteoporosis with zoledronic acid treatment. It's reported that this reaction is related to the blockade of the mevalonate pathway, leading to isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP) accumulation. And the latter can active γδT cells in the circulation, resulting in inflammatory cytokine release. Statins can inhibit the conversion of HMG-CoA to mevalonate that may reduce the accumulation of IPP. Therefore, it is possible that statins can be taken in advance to reduce APR caused by zoledronic acid infusion.
This study, which was designed as a prospective observational study, was planned to enroll 75 female patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis who had been using bisphosphonates for more than two years and did not respond to treatment. 2 doses of denosumab were administered to the patients every 6 months. Bone mineral density of patients were measured with DEXA at the beginning and end of the study. A total of 66 patients completed the study. At the end of the study, there was a significant improvement in the femur and lumbar total bone mineral density of the patients compared to the baseline. However, no statistically significant difference was found in terms of the frequency of new fractures.
This is a randomised, double-blind, multicentre study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, PK, PD, and immunogenicity of SB16 compared to Prolia® in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.