Osteoarthritis Clinical Trial
— IMMO-LDRT02Official title:
Investigation of the Clinical Efficacy of Low-dose Ionizing Radiation in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis
IMMO-LDRT02 is a prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial to investigate the clinical efficacy of low dose radiation therapy (LDRT) in the treatment of arthrosis. Newly diagnosed or already existing arthroses of the fingers, wrists, shoulders, knees, ankles and feet will be enclosed. Finally, the evidence of clinical benefit from LDRT (6 x 0.5 Gy) will be compared to the placebo group (6 x 0 Gy), by determination via a visual analog scale and identification of immunological changes.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 132 |
Est. completion date | December 31, 2028 |
Est. primary completion date | September 30, 2026 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 39 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Diagnosed osteoarthritis according to ACR criteria (exclusion of other other arthritides and chronic rheumatoid arthritis via laboratory tests): - Finger and wrist osteoarthritis - Elbow arthrosis - Shoulder arthrosis - Knee arthrosis - Ankle and foot joint arthrosis - First time application of low-dose radiotherapy (LDRT) of the affected joint. - Willingness to cooperate and accessibility of the patients (geographical proximity) for treatment and Follow-up care Exclusion Criteria: - Patients with tumor diseases - People capable of childbearing or procreation who do not take consistent contraceptive measures during therapy - Persistent drug, medication or alcohol abuse - Patients for whom, in the physician's judgment, participation is not justifiable with regard to their well-being due to temporary withdrawal of standard medication. - Patients in whom the diagnosis of osteoarthritis of the affected joint cannot be made without doubt. To establish the diagnosis, the guidelines of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) are followed. - Earlier radiation therapy for treatment of cancer |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Germany | Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen | Erlangen | Bavaria |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical School | Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Hospital |
Germany,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Improvement in general pain (determined by visual analog scale (VAS) score) after LDRT compared to the placebo. | Determination of the general pain level by determining a so-called pain score which is calculated from the parameters pain level (VAS) and pain history (duration, frequency, maximum, quality and occurrence of pain). VAS is determined from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain). Pain history will also assessed bei an scale from 1 to 10. | Day 0 till end of the trial at the distinct time points of end of first LDRT series (day 28), first follow up (day 112), end of second LDRT series (day 140), second follow up (day 224), final follow up (day336). | |
Primary | Identification of immunological changes, which contribute to the success of therapy and are specifically found in the test group. | Longitudinal Immunophenotyping of the patients: Detection of about 30 distinct immune cell (sub)types together with their activation markers during treatment. | Day 0 till end of the trial at the distinct time points of end of first LDRT series (day 28), first follow up (day 112), end of second LDRT series (day 140), second follow up (day 224), final follow up (day336). | |
Secondary | Evidence of an objectionable clinical benefit of LDRT for finger/wrist osteoarthritis. | Analysis of the pain-free finger and hand force by using finger and hand strength meter. | Day 0 till end of the trial at the distinct time points of end of first LDRT series (day 28), first follow up (day 112), end of second LDRT series (day 140), second follow up (day 224), final follow up (day336). | |
Secondary | Analysis of the efficacy of LDRT against placebo in modulating patient's well-being. | Determination of disease activity and pain using the international accepted EuroQol Research Foundation questionnaire EQ-5D-5L (IMMOLDRT02/EQ-5D-5L). Scale of EQ-5D-5L is from 5 (perfect well being) to 25 (illness with pain). | Day 0 till end of the trial at the distinct time points of end of first LDRT series (day 28), first follow up (day 112), end of second LDRT series (day 140), second follow up (day 224), final follow up (day336). | |
Secondary | Analysis of the clinical efficacy of LDRT against placebo in fingers / wrists. | Determination of disease activity and pain in treated Fingers / Wrists using international disease specific questionnaires (AUSCAN score). Scaled on 5-point Likert, 100mm Visual Analog and 11-box Numerical Rating Scales, the AUSCAN™ 3.1 is a valid, reliable and responsive measure of outcome. Scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain). | Day 0 till end of the trial at the distinct time points of end of first LDRT series (day 28), first follow up (day 112), end of second LDRT series (day 140), second follow up (day 224), final follow up (day336). | |
Secondary | Analysis of the clinical efficacy of LDRT against placebo in shoulders. | Determination of disease activity and pain in treated shoulders using international disease specific questionnaires (Oxford Shoulder Questionnaire (OSS). Score from 12 (no trouble) to 60 impossible to do). | Day 0 till end of the trial at the distinct time points of end of first LDRT series (day 28), first follow up (day 112), end of second LDRT series (day 140), second follow up (day 224), final follow up (day336). | |
Secondary | Analysis of the clinical efficacy of LDRT against placebo in knees. | Determination of disease activity and pain in treated knees using international disease specific questionnaires (Oxford Knee Questionnaire). Score from 12 (no trouble) to 60 impossible to do). | Day 0 till end of the trial at the distinct time points of end of first LDRT series (day 28), first follow up (day 112), end of second LDRT series (day 140), second follow up (day 224), final follow up (day336). | |
Secondary | Analysis of the clinical efficacy of LDRT against placebo in foot and ankle joints. | Determination of disease activity and pain in treated foot and ankle joints using international disease specific questionnaires (EFAS European Foot and ankle score questionnaire). Score from 0 (no problems) to 40 impossible to do). | Day 0 till end of the trial at the distinct time points of end of first LDRT series (day 28), first follow up (day 112), end of second LDRT series (day 140), second follow up (day 224), final follow up (day336). | |
Secondary | Documentation and examination of general medication and pain medication. | Collection of patient's drug use by electronic medication diary. | From Randomisation (day 0) till end of the trial (day 336), assessed every 7 days from day 0 to day 336.. | |
Secondary | Investigation of the drop-out rate in the test and control group. | Determination of the patients number changing the group from placebo to treatment group. | Fraom day of randomisation (day 0) till patient's independent trial abort or day 336, whichever came first. | |
Secondary | Comparison of the two series with single doses 0.5 Gy against one series with single dose 1.0 Gy with regard to pain score reduction and immunological changes | Determination of the general pain level by determining a so-called pain score which is calculated from the parameters pain level (VAS) and pain history (duration, frequency, maximum, quality and occurrence of pain). VAS is determined from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain). Pain history will also assessed bei an scale from 1 to 10. | Day 0 till end of the trial at the distinct time points of end of first LDRT series (day 28), first follow up (day 112), end of second LDRT series (day 140), second follow up (day 224), final follow up (day336). | |
Secondary | Modulation-matrix of immune cell function. | After blood collection, immune cells were separated and harvested. Cells are differentiated ex-vivo into mature immune cell sub populations, and their functionality is assessed by staining with surface markers using multicolour flowcytometry. Functionality is described by the amount of differentiable cells. | Day 0 till end of the trial at the distinct time points of end of first LDRT series (day 28), first follow up (day 112), end of second LDRT series (day 140), second follow up (day 224), final follow up (day336). | |
Secondary | Detection of chromosome aberrations | After blood collection, the immune cells were separated and harvested. The cells are examined ex-vivo for the occurrence of chromosomal aberrations using the multicolour Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) method. The number of chromosomal defects as well as the type is recorded. Comparison is then made with normal human donors as well as the between study groups. | Day 0 till end of the trial at the distinct time points of end of first LDRT series (day 28), first follow up (day 112), end of second LDRT series (day 140), second follow up (day 224), final follow up (day336). | |
Secondary | Investigation of side effect profile of LDRT | The adverse effects of LDRT is recorded by official questionnaire | Day 0 till end of the trial at the distinct time points of end of first LDRT series (day 28), first follow up (day 112), end of second LDRT series (day 140), second follow up (day 224), final follow up (day336). |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04657926 -
A Trial of APPA in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02536833 -
A Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of SM04690 Injected in the Target Knee Joint of Moderately to Severely Symptomatic Osteoarthritis Subjects
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03014037 -
Comparing Mesenchymal Stem Cell Counts in Unilateral vs. Bilateral Posterior Superior Iliac Spine Bone Marrow Aspiration
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05937542 -
A Qualitative Investigation of CLEAT Participants
|
||
Completed |
NCT03644615 -
A Mindfulness Program (MBSR) in the Management of Symptomatic Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06061367 -
Muscles Strength and Gait Parameteres After TKA
|
||
Withdrawn |
NCT04976972 -
A Comparison of Patients Receiving a Total Knee Replacement With Robotic Assistance or With Conventional Instrumentation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05496205 -
A SAD Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and PK/PD of iN1011-N17 in Healthy Volunteers
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03850665 -
Comparison of Functional Outcome in Patients After Hip Arthroplasty Depending on Surgical Approach
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02826902 -
Effect of Anesthesia on Quality of Recovery in Patients Undergoing Correctional Tibial Osteotomy - A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04402502 -
Dynamic 4DCT to Examine Wrist Carpal Mechanics
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02923700 -
Leukocyte-rich PRP vs Leukocyte-poor PRP for the Treatment of Knee Cartilage Degeneration: a Randomized Controlled Trial
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04564053 -
Study of Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of LNA043 in Japanese Osteoarthritis Participants
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT05070871 -
A Clinical Trial Investigating the Effect of Salmon Bone Meal on Osteoarthritis Among Men and Women
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05036174 -
Diphenhydramine Ointment for Knee Osteoarthritis
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02912429 -
Onlay vs. Inlay Patellofemoral Arthroplasty
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02666443 -
Low Dose Dexamethasone in Supraclavicular Blocks
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02723929 -
Effects of tDCS and tUS on Pain Perception in OA of the Knee
|
||
Withdrawn |
NCT02921594 -
Kinematic Comparison of Vanguard XP and Vanguard CR Total Knee Arthroplasties
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02820766 -
Journey II BCS CMS Total Knee System Compared to Other PS Total Knee Systems in PT Setting
|
N/A |